LexisNexis® Mealey's™ Intellectual Property Pleadings Legal News http://www.lexisnexis.com/mealeys/news.aspx Headline Intellectual Property Pleadings Legal News from LexisNexis® en-us LexisNexis® Headline Intellectual Property Pleadings Legal News http://www.lexisnexis.com/mealeys/images/lexismealeyslogo.gif 130 29 http://www.lexisnexis.com/mealeys/news.aspx Copyright 2012 http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&keyenum=25271&keytnum=0&searchtype=get&search=8-22%20Mealey%27s%20Intell.%20Prop.%20Plead.%201%20(2012)&view=full&ORIGINATION_CODE=00144 target=_blank File Sharer Says Review Of Recording Industry's 'Offense To Justice' Needed Case: Joel Tenenbaum v. Sony BMG Music Entertainment, et al., No. 11-1019, U.S. Sup.; 2012 U.S. S. Ct. Briefs LEXIS 1840; See 5/7/2012, Page 46. http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&keyenum=25271&keytnum=0&searchtype=get&search=8-22%20Mealey%27s%20Intell.%20Prop.%20Plead.%202%20(2012)&view=full&ORIGINATION_CODE=00144 target=_blank Adult Video Companies Debate Copyright, Trademark Infringement Rulings Case: Studio A Entertainment, Inc. v. Action DVD, et al., No. 09-4358, 6th Cir. Appellant brief: Filed March 23 by Action DVD and Alex BelferAppellant brief available 78-120521-011B http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&keyenum=25271&keytnum=0&searchtype=get&search=8-22%20Mealey%27s%20Intell.%20Prop.%20Plead.%203%20(2012)&view=full&ORIGINATION_CODE=00144 target=_blank Possible Attorney Fee Sanction Debated In Copyright Case Settlement Dispute Case: Remark LLC v. Adell Broadcasting Corporation, d/b/a WADL-TV, Nos. 11-2349, 11-2442, 6th Cir.; See 4/16/12, Page 35. http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&keyenum=25271&keytnum=0&searchtype=get&search=8-22%20Mealey%27s%20Intell.%20Prop.%20Plead.%204%20(2012)&view=full&ORIGINATION_CODE=00144 target=_blank Trademark Dispute Between Mushroom Sellers Debated In 9th Circuit Case: Hokto Kinoko Company, et al. v. Concord Farms, Inc., No. 11-56461, 9th Cir. Appellant brief: Filed Feb21 by Concord Farms IncAppellant brief available 78-120521-004B http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&keyenum=25271&keytnum=0&searchtype=get&search=8-22%20Mealey%27s%20Intell.%20Prop.%20Plead.%205%20(2012)&view=full&ORIGINATION_CODE=00144 target=_blank Companies Back Bid Of R.J. Reynolds For Review Of Patent Definiteness Ruling Case: R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, et al. v. Star Scientific, Inc., No. 11-1182, U.S. Sup.; See 4/16/12, Page 38. http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&keyenum=25271&keytnum=0&searchtype=get&search=8-22%20Mealey%27s%20Intell.%20Prop.%20Plead.%206%20(2012)&view=full&ORIGINATION_CODE=00144 target=_blank Inter Partes Re-Examinations Are Contested Cases, Patent Holder Argues Case: Abbott Laboratories v. Cordis Corporation, No. 12-1244, Fed. Cir. Appellant brief: Filed May 7 by Cordis CorpAppellant brief available 78-120521-010B http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&keyenum=25271&keytnum=0&searchtype=get&search=8-21%20Mealey%27s%20Intell.%20Prop.%20Plead.%201%20(2012)&view=full&ORIGINATION_CODE=00144 target=_blank Merit Of Supreme Court Review Debated In File-Sharing Case Case: Joel Tenenbaum v. Sony BMG Music Entertainment, et al., No. 11-1019, U.S. Sup.; 2012 U.S. S. Ct. Briefs LEXIS 724. http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&keyenum=25271&keytnum=0&searchtype=get&search=8-21%20Mealey%27s%20Intell.%20Prop.%20Plead.%202%20(2012)&view=full&ORIGINATION_CODE=00144 target=_blank Computer Makers Debate Supreme Court Review Of Copyright Misuse Doctrine Case: Psystar Corporation v. Apple, Inc., No. 11-812, U.S. Sup. Petition for writ of certiorari: Filed Dec27 by Psystar CorpPetition for writ of certiorari available 78-120507-005B http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&keyenum=25271&keytnum=0&searchtype=get&search=8-21%20Mealey%27s%20Intell.%20Prop.%20Plead.%203%20(2012)&view=full&ORIGINATION_CODE=00144 target=_blank Petitioner: Supreme Court Should Decide Standard Of Review In Patent Rulings Case: Research & Diagnostic Systems, Inc., and Techne Corporation v. Streck, Inc., No. 11-1212, U.S. Sup. http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&keyenum=25271&keytnum=0&searchtype=get&search=8-21%20Mealey%27s%20Intell.%20Prop.%20Plead.%204%20(2012)&view=full&ORIGINATION_CODE=00144 target=_blank Syringe Maker Says All Claim Construction Issues Should Be Reviewed Case: Becton, Dickinson and Company v. Retractable Technologies, Inc., et al., No. 11-1278, U.S. Sup.; 2012 U.S. S. Ct. Briefs LEXIS 1652; See 4/2/12, Page 37. http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&keyenum=25271&keytnum=0&searchtype=get&search=8-21%20Mealey%27s%20Intell.%20Prop.%20Plead.%205%20(2012)&view=full&ORIGINATION_CODE=00144 target=_blank Appellee: 9th Circuit Ruling Should Be Applied To Suit Over Jimi Hendrix Marks Case: Experience Hendrix LLC and Authentic Hendrix LLC v. HendrixLicensing.com Ltd. d/b/a Hendrix Artwork and HendrixArtwork.com and Andrew Pitsicalis, Nos. 11-35858, 11-35872, 9th Cir.; See 2/17/12, Page 38. http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&keyenum=25271&keytnum=0&searchtype=get&search=8-21%20Mealey%27s%20Intell.%20Prop.%20Plead.%206%20(2012)&view=full&ORIGINATION_CODE=00144 target=_blank Maker Of Trademarked Medical Device Says Judge's Errors Led To Wrong Verdict Case: Neurovision Medical Products, Inc. v. NuVasive, Inc., Nos. 11-55120, 11-55756, 9th Cir.; See 1/23/12, Page 37. http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&keyenum=25271&keytnum=0&searchtype=get&search=8-21%20Mealey%27s%20Intell.%20Prop.%20Plead.%207%20(2012)&view=full&ORIGINATION_CODE=00144 target=_blank Court's Ruling In Trademark Dispute Did Not Go Far Enough, Bank Argues Case: Oriental Financial Group, Inc., et al. v. Cooperativa de Ahorro y Cr[#233]dito Oriental, Nos. 11-1473, 11-1476, 1st Cir.; See 12/19/11, Page 37. http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&keyenum=25271&keytnum=0&searchtype=get&search=8-20%20Mealey%27s%20Intell.%20Prop.%20Plead.%201%20(2012)&view=full&ORIGINATION_CODE=00144 target=_blank Need For Review Of Foreign Copies And 1st-Sale Doctrine Debated In Supreme Court Case: Supap Kirtsaeng d/b/a Bluechristine99 v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., No. 11-697, and Ganghua Liu v. Pearson Education, Inc., et al., No. 11-708, U.S. Sup. http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&keyenum=25271&keytnum=0&searchtype=get&search=8-20%20Mealey%27s%20Intell.%20Prop.%20Plead.%202%20(2012)&view=full&ORIGINATION_CODE=00144 target=_blank File-Sharing Defendant Prepares Copyright Act Damages Case For Supreme Court Case: Capitol Records, et al. v. Jammie Thomas-Rasset, Nos. 11-2820, 11-2858, 8th Cir.; See 4/2/12, Page 41. http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&keyenum=25271&keytnum=0&searchtype=get&search=8-20%20Mealey%27s%20Intell.%20Prop.%20Plead.%203%20(2012)&view=full&ORIGINATION_CODE=00144 target=_blank Yankees' Tactics On Appeal Fail, Plaintiff In Copyright Infringement Action Says Case: Tanit Buday v. New York Yankees Partnership, No. 11-4803, 2nd Cir.; See 4/2/12, Page 42. Appellant reply brief: Filed April 3 by Tanit BudayAppellant reply brief available 78-120416-017B http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&keyenum=25271&keytnum=0&searchtype=get&search=8-20%20Mealey%27s%20Intell.%20Prop.%20Plead.%204%20(2012)&view=full&ORIGINATION_CODE=00144 target=_blank Settlement Ruling Correct, But Attorney Fees Warranted, Copyright Holder Says Case: Remark LLC v. Adell Broadcasting Corporation, d/b/a WADL-TV, Nos. 11-2349, 11-2442, 6th Cir.; See 3/19/12, Page 40. http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&keyenum=25271&keytnum=0&searchtype=get&search=8-20%20Mealey%27s%20Intell.%20Prop.%20Plead.%205%20(2012)&view=full&ORIGINATION_CODE=00144 target=_blank Appellee's Arguments In Copyright, Patent Case Are Smokescreen, Appellants Say Case: Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc., and Mark T. Pappas, No. 11-2250, 4th Cir.; See 3/19/12, Page 42. http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&keyenum=25271&keytnum=0&searchtype=get&search=8-20%20Mealey%27s%20Intell.%20Prop.%20Plead.%206%20(2012)&view=full&ORIGINATION_CODE=00144 target=_blank Federal Circuit's Analysis Of Patent Definiteness Needs Review, R.J. Reynolds Says Case: R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, et al. v. Star Scientific, Inc., No. 11-1182, U.S. Sup.; 2012 U.S. S. Ct. Briefs LEXIS 1265. http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&keyenum=25271&keytnum=0&searchtype=get&search=8-20%20Mealey%27s%20Intell.%20Prop.%20Plead.%207%20(2012)&view=full&ORIGINATION_CODE=00144 target=_blank Enforceability Of Trademark For Tennis Grip Color Argued In 11th Circuit Case: Unique Sports Products, Inc. v. Ferrari Importing Company, No. 11-15586, 11th Cir. Appellant brief: Filed Jan23 by Ferrari Importing Company d/b/a Gamma SportsAppellant brief available 78-120416-013B