<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> 

<rss version="2.0"> 

<channel>

<title>LexisNexis&#174; Mealey's&#8482; Reinsurance Legal News</title>

<link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/mealeys/news.aspx</link>

<description>Headline Reinsurance Legal News from LexisNexis&#174;</description>

<language>en-us</language>

 

<copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>

<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2020-14 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 1%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>5th Circuit: La. Insurance Law Doesn't Reverse-Preempt Federal Arbitration Law</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[NEW ORLEANS - After en banc rehearing, a Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals majority on Nov. 9 vacated and remanded a lower court finding and held that the McCarran?Ferguson Act does not authorize a state law to reverse-preempt the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards or its implementing legislation (Safety National Casualty Corporation, et al. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, et al., No. 06-30262, 5th Cir.; See 4/17/09, Page 6). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=20-14 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 1 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2020-14 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 2%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>English Court Takes Jurisdiction Over Hurricane Rita Reinsurance Dispute</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[LONDON - In a reinsurance dispute involving Bermudan, Swiss and British entities regarding coverage placed in London to reinsure Hurricane Rita damage to an American insured, an English justice ruled Oct. 9 that English law governs the agreements and that an English court has jurisdiction (Gard Marine &amp; Energy Limited v. Lloyd Tunnicliffe, et al., No. 2007-351, English High, QBD, Comm.; [2009] EWHC 2388 [Comm]). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=20-14 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 2 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2020-14 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 3%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>3rd Circuit Panel: $20M State Court Reinsurance Proceeds Judgment Is Proper</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[PHILADELPHIA - A Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel on Nov. 6 affirmed a lower court opinion and held that a New York state court's $20 million reinsurance proceeds judgment against the co-owner of an insurance company was proper and enforceable in a Pennsylvania federal court (Jeanne S. Di Loreto v. William F. Costigan, Esquire, et al., No. 09-1812, 3rd Cir.; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 24457; See 3/20/09, Page 11). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=20-14 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 3 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2020-14 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 4%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>Ill. Federal Court Sees Continued Sparring Over Sealed Reinsurance Case Records</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[CHICAGO - In a federal court in Illinois on Nov. 6, a reinsurer's sealed pleading regarding the continued sealing of certain documents was filed in a $25 million dispute that has been ruled upon and appealed with no substantive documents yet being released (Trustmark Insurance Company v. John Hancock Life Insurance Company, No. 09-cv-03959, N.D. Ill.). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=20-14 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 4 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2020-14 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 5%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>Judge Denies Motions To Certify Reinsurance Case Summary Judgment For Appeal</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[NEW YORK - A federal judge in New York on Oct. 28 denied a reinsurance broker and the rehabilitator of an insolvent insurer's motions to certify for appeal a summary judgment in favor of a reinsurer and held that the disputed issues of fact regarding a certain reinsurance contract are not ripe for review by an appellate court but better left to be resolved by a jury (Howard Mills, in his capacity as rehabilitator of Frontier Insurance Co. v. Everest Reinsurance Co. and Benfield Inc., No. 05-8928, S.D. N.Y.; See 8/7/09, Page 7). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=20-14 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 5 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2020-14 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 6%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>Justice Permits Equitas To Use Actuarial Models To Establish Reinsurance Losses</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[LONDON - An English commercial justice on Nov. 11 ruled that Equitas Ltd. may rely on actuarial models to establish the properly recoverable minimum losses under retrocessional excess of loss reinsurance policies involving claims that included the Exxon Valdez oil spill (Equitas Ltd. v. R&amp;Q Reinsurance Co. [UK] Ltd., No. 1418; Equitas Ltd. v. ACE European Group Ltd., No. 1420, English High, Comm., QBD). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=20-14 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 6 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2020-14 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 7%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>In N.Y. Federal Court, Reinsurer Says Reinsured Misrepresented Covered Risk</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[SYRACUSE, NY - In a New York federal court on Nov. 2, a reinsurer denied an insurer's accusations regarding alleged obligations over certain asbestos-related claims and counterclaimed for rescission of certain certificates, while alleging that the insurer had intentionally and negligently misrepresented the reinsured risks (Utica Mutual Insurances Company v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, No. 09-cv-00853, N.D. N.Y.; See. 9/4/09, Page 10). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=20-14 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 7 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2020-14 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 8%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>Insurers Say Reinsurer Owes Them More Than $535,000 From Asbestos Claims</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[PROVIDENCE, R.I. - A pair of insurers on Oct. 26 sued a reinsurer in the U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island, claiming that the reinsurer owes them more than $535,000 for amounts they allegedly paid to a number of companies for claims related to bodily injury as a result of asbestos exposure (Seaton Insurance Company, formerly known as Unigard Mutual Insurance Company, et al. v. Clearwater Insurance Company formerly known as Skandia America Reinsurance Corporation, No. 09-cv-00516, D. R.I.). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=20-14 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 8 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2020-14 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 9%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>Insurers Accuse Reinsurer Of Failing To Pay $1.3M In Billings</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[ST. PAUL, Minn. - A group of insurance companies sued their alleged reinsurer on Nov. 3 in a Minnesota federal court, claiming that the reinsurer has failed to make $1.3 million in payments on outstanding billings (Northland Insurance Company, et al. v. PMA Capital Insurance Company, No. 09-0-cv-0375, D. Minn.). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=20-14 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 9 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2020-14 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 10%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>In N.Y. Federal Court, Surety Bond Reinsurer Says Holder's Claims Are Futile</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[CENTRAL ISLIP, NY - Arguing against a motion for reconsideration to amend a complaint, a surety bond reinsurer said in a New York federal court on Nov. 2 that a federal judge properly denied the motion to add Louisiana statutory claims to the complaint because the state claims are allegedly futile (Callon Petroleum Company v. National Indemnity Company, No. 06-cv-0573, E.D. N.Y.; See 9/18/09, Page 14). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=20-14 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 10 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2020-14 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 11%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>Excess Insurer Moves To Intervene In $38 Million Business Interruption Case</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[HUNTINGTON, W.Va. - An excess insurer of a company that is suing its primary insurers and a reinsurer and claiming to have lost more than $38 million in business interruption because of a furnace failure at a metals factory moved Nov. 3 to intervene in the suit in a West Virginia federal court (Felman Production, Inc., v. Industrial Risk Insurers, et al., No. 09-cv-0481, S.D. W.Va.). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=20-14 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 11 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2020-14 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 12%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>News From The LexisNexis Insurance Law Center</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[[Editor's Note: The following items of interest appeared recently on the LexisNexis Insurance Law Center. Devoted to insurance litigation and the insurance industry, the Insurance Law Center is where you can connect with other insurance professionals to discuss the hottest issues. Become a regular contributor. Visit the center on the open Web for insurance-related headlines, discussion, expert commentary and more at: http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/insurance] 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=20-14 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 12 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>

<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2020-13 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 1%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>3rd Circuit Affirms Order Compelling Reinsurer And Retrocessionaire To Arbitrate</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[PHILADELPHIA - A Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel on Oct. 15 affirmed a lower court's order compelling an arbitration between a reinsurer and its retrocessional reinsurer because the retrocessional reinsurance agreements incorporated the arbitration clauses of certain reinsurance treaties between the reinsurer and its reinsured (Century Indemnity Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, No. 08-2924, 3rd Cir.; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 22619; See 3/20/09, Page 5). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=20-13 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 1 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2020-13 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 2%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>Wis. Federal Judge Denies Reinsurers' Motion To Reconsider Assigned Arbitrator</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[MADISON, Wis. - A Wisconsin federal judge on Oct. 23 denied a group of reinsurers' motion for reconsideration of her earlier order refusing to disqualify an insurer's appointed arbitrator and her granting of the insurer's motion to appoint a third arbitrator because the reinsurers did not persuade the judge that the earlier opinion was in error or that any grounds exist for relief (Employers Insurance Company of Wausau v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London, et al., No. 09-201, W.D. Wis.; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98746). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=20-13 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 2 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2020-13 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 3%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>Reinsurers Challenge Suit To Disqualify Arbitrator In Illinois Federal Court</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[CHICAGO - In a federal court in Illinois on Oct. 26, a pair of reinsurers moved to dismiss their renisured's complaint alleging that an arbitration panel member is not "disinterested," arguing that the complaint is without merit and that the reinsured has failed to establish the panel member's alleged partiality (Trustmark Insurance Company v. Clarendon National Insurance Company, et al., No. 09-cv-06169, N.D. Ill.; See. 10/16/09, Page 5). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=20-13 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 3 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2020-13 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 4%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>In Illinois Federal Court, Reinsurer Says Insurer Waived Right To Recover Funds</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[CHICAGO - A federal judge in Illinois on Oct. 23 held a hearing regarding a reinsurer's motion for summary judgment in which the reinsurer says that an insurer's claim to recover certain monies was waived in a related state court case and that the insurer's allegations should therefore be dismissed (TIG Insurance Company v. Carnforth Limited, No. 08-cv-03618, N.D. Ill.). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=20-13 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 4 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2020-13 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 5%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>Reinsurer In Illinois Federal Court: Insurer Kept $3.5 Million More Than Agreed</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[CHICAGO - In an Illinois federal court where an insurer accuses a reinsurer of refusing to pay $1.8 million in obligations under certain reinsurance agreements, the reinsurer on Oct. 26 counterclaimed that the insurer retained more than $3.5 million above the amount it was contractually permitted under the agreements (Guarantee Trust Life Insurance Company v. Munich Reinsurance America, Inc., No. 09-cv-05840, N.D. Ill.). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=20-13 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 5 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2020-13 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 6%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>3rd Circuit Panel Overturns Dismissal Of Suit Accusing Lender Of Kickback Scheme</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[PHILADELPHIA - A class action lawsuit that accuses a mortgage lender of implementing a mortgage insurance captive reinsurance kickback scheme was revived by a Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel on Oct. 28 (Mary Alston, et al. v. Countrywide Financial Corp., et al., No. 08-4334, 3rd Cir.; See 9/4/09, Page 8). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=20-13 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 6 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2020-13 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 7%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>Reinsurer Responds That Insurer Is Not Entitled Relief In Mich. Federal Court</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[DETROIT - After a federal judge in Michigan denied an insurer's claims against an automobile insurance reinsurer because the insurer could not prove that it had paid a premium on a specific vehicle, the reinsurer on Oct. 21 responded to the insurer's motion for relief, saying the insurer is wrong to suggest that it does not have to prove it reinsured the specific vehicle (Old Republic Insurance Company v. Michigan Catastrophic Claims Association, No. 08-12533, E.D. Mich.; See 10/16/09, Page 8). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=20-13 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 7 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2020-13 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 8%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>Insurer Did Not Assume All Coverage Obligations, 3rd Circuit Panel Says</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[PHILADELPHIA - An asset purchase agreement does not obligate Hartford Fire Insurance Co. to step into the shoes of an insolvent insurer and provide coverage to a former G-I Holdings Inc. officer who is a defendant in three fraudulent conveyance lawsuits, the Third Circuit U.S Court of Appeals affirmed Oct. 26 (G-I Holdings Inc., et al. v. Reliance Insurance Co., et al., No. 07-2510, 3rd Cir.; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 23488). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=20-13 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 8 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2020-13 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 9%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>Liquidator, Not Association, Owed Reinsurance Proceeds, Judge Concludes</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[PHILADELPHIA - The Mississippi Insurance Guaranty Association (MIGA) is not entitled to $2.5 million in reinsurance proceeds acquired by the now insolvent Legion Insurance Co., a Pennsylvania trial judge ruled Sept. 28, because the reinsurance assets belong to the Legion estate (General Reinsurance Corp. v. American Bankers Insurance Company of Florida, et al., No. 527 MD 2005, Pa. Cmwth.). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=20-13 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 9 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2020-13 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 10%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>Insurer Says Reinsurer Should Follow Its Fortunes In $35M Asbestos Settlement</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[NEW YORK - An insurer on Oct. 20 sued its reinsurer in a New York federal court over alleged obligations regarding a $35 million settlement of certain asbestos-related claims against an insolvent insulation products distributor and installer and asked the court for a declaration that the reinsurer must follow the fortunes of the insurer (Republic Indemnity Company of America v. Transatlantic Reinsurance Company, No. 09-cv-08871, S.D. N.Y.). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=20-13 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 10 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2020-13 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 11%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>Judge Remands Action Against Insolvent Crop Insurance Company</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[OMAHA, Neb. - A Nebraska federal judge on Oct. 26 denied a liquidator's motion to dismiss a reinsurer's lawsuit seeking unpaid reinsurance premiums against an insolvent crop insurer and instead remanded the case to the state court's liquidation proceeding (Granite Reinsurance Co. Ltd. v. Ann M. Frohman, Nebraska director of insurance in her capacity as liquidator of American Growers Insurance Co., No. 08-410, D. Neb.; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72294). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=20-13 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 11 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2020-13 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 12%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>Hurricane Rita Case Reinsurers Tell Texas Federal Court Of Related Litigation</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[HOUSTON - A group of insurers embroiled in a dispute with a chemical plant operator and its captive insurer over damage to the chemical plant caused by Hurricane Rita notified a Texas federal court on Oct. 26 of related litigation that was stayed when the parties agreed to arbitrate their disputes (Arch Reinsurance of Nebraska, et al. v. Huntsman Corporation, et al., No. 09-cv-02404, S.D. Texas; See 9/18/09, Page 13). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=20-13 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 12 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2020-13 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 13%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>Reinsurer Had Right To Pursue Insolvent Insurer's Overpayments, Judge Says</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[SPOKANE, Wash. - Through an assignment agreement, a reinsurer had the right to pursue recovery of alleged overpayments made by an insolvent crop insurer, a Washington federal judge found Sept. 30 (Lynn Olsen d.b.a. Olsen Agriprises and Carr Farms LLC v. United States of America, et al., Nos. 08-5012 &amp; 08-5013, E.D. Wash.; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93614). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=20-13 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 13 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2020-13 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 14%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>Judge Grants Reinsurers' Motion To Dismiss Previously Dismissed Counterclaims</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[NEW YORK - A federal judge in New York on Oct. 14 granted a pair of reinsurers' motion to dismiss a number of counterclaims brought in an amended answer by the alleged guarantor of certain reinsurance obligations and said that although the counterclaims had been dismissed in an earlier order and were meant only to preserve the right to appeal, they should be dismissed so they could not be misconstrued as an attempt to relitigate (Everest National Insurance Company, et al. v. Robert Sutton, et al., No. 07-cv-00722, D. N.J.; See 8/7/09, Page 9). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=20-13 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 14 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2020-13 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 15%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>Ill. Federal Judge Dismisses Reinsurer And Reinsured's Commutation Dispute</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[CHICAGO - A federal judge in Illinois on Oct. 14 issued an agreed order of dismissal of an action between a reinsurer and its reinsured regarding the parties' dispute over whether a commutation and release agreement terminating certain reinsurance agreements covers certain other reinsurance contracts purchased by the reinsured from a pair of nonparty insurers (Continental Casualty Co. and Continental Insurance Co. v. Commercial Risk Re-Insurance Co., et al., No. 07-C-6912, N.D. Ill.; See 5/1/09, Page 8). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=20-13 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 15 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>

<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2020-12 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 1%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>2nd Circuit Panel Remands $34M Reinsurance Case, Says Record Not Complete</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[NEW YORK - In a summary order issued Oct. 6, a Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel remanded a case involving a $34 million jury award between a group of insurers and a German reinsurer and mandated that the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York commence proceedings to create a record regarding the reinsurer's claim that the insurers waived their right to arbitrate (AXA Versicherung AG, on its own behalf and as successor in interest to Albingia Versicherungs AG v. New Hampshire Insurance Co., et al., No. 08-2521, 2nd Cir.; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 21923). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=20-12 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 1 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2020-12 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 2%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>Reinsured Says Arbitrator Is Not 'Disinterested,' Should Be Disqualified</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[CHICAGO - On Oct. 2, a reinsured sued its reinsurer in an Illinois federal court, asking the court to disqualify the reinsurer's arbitrator because she is allegedly not "disinterested" as required by a certain arbitration agreement (Trustmark Insurance Company v. Clarendon National Insurance Company, et al., No. 09-cv-06169, N.D. Ill.). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=20-12 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 2 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2020-12 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 3%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>Reinsurer Appeals Pa. Federal Judge's Denial Of $6 Million Arbitration Award</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[PHILADELPHIA - A reinsurer on Oct. 9 filed a notice in a Pennsylvania federal court that it had appealed to the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals a judge's denial of the reinsurer's motion to confirm a $6 million arbitration award after the judge on Oct. 2 had also denied the reinsurer's motion to remand the dispute to the arbitration panel (PMA Capital Insurance Co., et al. v. Platinum Underwriters Bermuda, Ltd., No. 09-mc-0084, E.D. Pa.; See 10/2/09, Page 4). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=20-12 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 3 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2020-12 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 4%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>N.Y. Panel: Burden Of Proof Met In Alleged Reinsurance Treaty Mutual Mistake</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[NEW YORK - A New York appeals panel on Oct. 1 reversed a lower court dismissal of an insurer's reformation claims against a reinsurer and held that the insurer had met its burden of proof regarding an alleged mutual mistake in a series of reinsurance agreements (Gulf Insurance Company v. Transatlantic Reinsurance Company, et al., No. 3846 601602/03 601077/04, N.Y. App. Div., 1st Dept.; 2009 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6643). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=20-12 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 4 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2020-12 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 5%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>Mich. Federal Judge: Alleged Reinsured Failed To Show Relevant Premium Payments</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[DETROIT - After finding that an insurer could not show that it paid certain premiums to a statutorily created reinsurance association, a federal judge in Michigan on Sept. 29 granted summary judgment to the reinsurance pool against the insurer's allegation that the pool is obligated to indemnify it for certain claims (Old Republic Insurance Company v. Michigan Catastrophic Claims Association, No. 08-12533, E.D. Mich.; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89799). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=20-12 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 5 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2020-12 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 6%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>Insurer Asks Illinois Federal Court To Enforce $1.8M Reinsurance Dispute</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[CHICAGO - An insurer on Sept. 18 accused its reinsurer in an Illinois federal court of refusing to pay $1.8 million in cash calls and quota share obligations under a reinsurance agreement (Guarantee Trust Life Insurance Company v. Munich Reinsurance America, Inc., No. 09-cv-05840, N.D. Ill.). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=20-12 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 6 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2020-12 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 7%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>Counterclaims Filed In Ill. Federal Court Over Reinsurance Pool's Fraud Case</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[CHICAGO - A group of insurers filed their amended counterclaims in an Illinois federal court on Oct. 7 after their motion to realign the action regarding fraud claims originally brought by a reinsurance pool was denied on their argument that they should be named as plaintiff in the case now that the court has found that the pool has no standing (National Council on Compensation Insurance Inc. v. American International Group Inc., et al., No. 07-cv-2898, N.D. Ill.; See 9/4/09, Page 4). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=20-12 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 7 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2020-12 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 8%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>Reinsurer, Insurer Agree, Ask Judge To Drop Motion To Dismiss Contribution Claim</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[LOS ANGELES - A reinsurer and an insurer on Oct. 7 notified a federal judge in California that they have reached an agreement in a dispute regarding certain liabilities for losses payable under a policy written by an insolvent insurer (Clarendon National Insurance Company v. Arrowood Surplus Lines Insurance Co., fka Royal Surplus Lines Insurance Company, No. 09-cv-05584, C.D. Calif.; See 10/2/09, Page 13). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=20-12 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 8 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2020-12 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 9%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>Reinsurer In Receivership Not Directly Liable For Claims, Panel Determines</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[KANSAS CITY, Mo. - Because a reinsurance agreement did not make Transit Casualty Co. in receivership directly liable to an insurance company's successor, a Missouri appeals panel on Sept. 29 upheld a finding that the successor insurer's claims against the Transit receivership estate are Class 5 general creditor claims and not Class 3 policy claims (J.C. Penney Life Insurance Co. v. Transit Casualty Co. in receivership, No. WD69819, W.D. Mo. App.; 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1378). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=20-12 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 9 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2020-12 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 10%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>Insurer Had No Cognizable Property Right In Sale Of Policies, Panel Determines</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[WASHINGTON, D.C. - The Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Oct. 1 affirmed the dismissal of an insurer's Fifth Amendment takings action because the insurer did not have a cognizable property interest in the ability to freely transfer its insolvent subsidiary's federally reinsured crop insurance policies. Thus, there was no cognizable property interest that could be taken when a government agency rejected a proposed sale of the policies (Acceptance Insurance Cos. Inc. v. United States, No. 2009-5015, U.S. Fed. Cir.; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 21549; See 10/8/08, Page 8). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=20-12 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 10 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2020-12 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 11%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>New York Justice Dismisses A Portion Of Reinsurers' Claims Against Brokers</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[NEW YORK - A New York County Supreme Court justice on Sept. 29 granted a portion of a motion to dismiss filed by a group of insurance brokers after determining that a number of investors in syndicates that are reinsurance underwriters through the Lloyd's of London insurance market that sued them released the brokers from liability for losses in connection with asbestos claims under policies brokered by the defendants (George Aldrich, et al. v. Marsh &amp; McLennan Co. Inc., et al., No. 605336/99, N.Y. Sup., New York Co.; 2009 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2713). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=20-12 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 11 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2020-12 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 12%20(2009)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>News From The LexisNexis Insurance Law Center</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[[Editor's Note: The following items of interest appeared recently on the LexisNexis Insurance Law Center. Devoted to insurance litigation and the insurance industry, the Insurance Law Center is where you can connect with other insurance professionals to discuss the hottest issues. Become a regular contributor. Visit the center on the open Web for insurance-related headlines, discussion, expert commentary and more at: http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/insurance.] 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=20-12 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 12 (2009)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>

</channel>

</rss> 

