<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> 

<rss version="2.0"> 

<channel>

<title>LexisNexis&#174; Mealey's&#8482; Reinsurance Legal News</title>

<link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/mealeys/news.aspx</link>

<description>Headline Reinsurance Legal News from LexisNexis&#174;</description>

<language>en-us</language>

 

<copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>

<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2022-19 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 1%20(2012)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>N.C. Federal Judge Says Dispute Consolidation Is Up To Arbitrators, Not Court</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[CHARLOTTE, N.C. - Granting a motion to consolidate a pair of asbestos-related reinsurance lawsuits, a federal judge in North Carolina on Jan. 19 also said it is up to arbitrators to decide whether to consolidate a number of arbitrations under one panel (Arrowood Indemnity Company, f/k/a Royal Indemnity Company v. Harper Insurance Company, f/k/a Turegum Insurance Company, No. 12-cv-00002, and Arrowood Indemnity Company, f/k/a Royal Indemnity Company v. Harper Insurance Company, f/k/a Turegum Insurance Company, No. 12-cv-00003, W.D. N.C.; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5840; See 1/20/12, Page 9). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=22-19 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 1 (2012)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2022-19 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 2%20(2012)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>New York Appellate Majority Affirms $262M Asbestos Reinsurance Dispute</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[NEW YORK - Holding that a lower court correctly applied the follow-the-fortunes doctrine, a New York appellate division panel majority on Jan. 24 affirmed a lower court's decision ordering a group of reinsurers to pay more than $262 million of asbestos related reinsurance billings (United States Fidelity &amp; Guaranty Company, et al. v. American Re-Insurance Company, et al., No. 604517/02, N.Y. Sup., App. Div., 1st Dept.; 2012 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 416). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=22-19 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 2 (2012)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2022-19 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 3%20(2012)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>Insurer Tells 1st Circuit Reinsurance Dispute Should Have Been Left Up To A Jury</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[BOSTON - An insurer tells the First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in a Jan. 19 filing that summary judgment of its dispute with its reinsurer was in error and that material facts at issue should have been allowed to proceed to trial before a jury (OneBeacon America Insurance Company v. Commercial Union Assurance Company of Canada, No. 11-2072, 1st Cir.; See 10/7/11, Page 11). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=22-19 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 3 (2012)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2022-19 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 4%20(2012)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>Insurer Sues Reinsurer Over $346,143.57 In Asbestos Losses</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[NEW HAVEN, Conn. - Suing its reinsurer, an insurer told a Connecticut federal court on Jan. 25 that its reinsurer owes it $346,143.57 in asbestos-related reinsurance billings (Travelers Casualty and Surety Company v. Independence American Insurance Company, No. 12-cv-00115, D. Conn.). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=22-19 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 4 (2012)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2022-19 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 5%20(2012)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>Reinsurer Sued In Calif. Federal Court For $975,000 In Asbestos-Related Billing</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[LOS ANGELES - An insurer sued a reinsurer in a California federal court on Jan. 18, alleging that the reinsurer owes it in excess of $975,000 in asbestos personal injury related losses and expenses (New Hampshire Insurance Company v. Transport Insurance Company, No. 12-cv-00431, C.D. Calif.). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=22-19 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 5 (2012)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2022-19 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 6%20(2012)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>Insurer: Severed Federal Suit Is Still More Inclusive Than State Action</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[PROVIDENCE, R.I. - An insurer tells a Rhode Island federal court in a Jan. 24 filing that severing its claims against a reinsurer from those of another insurer will not prejudice the reinsurer (Seaton Insurance Company, formerly known as Unigard Mutual Insurance Company, et al. v. Clearwater Insurance Company formerly known as Skandia America Reinsurance Corporation, No. 09-cv-00516, D. R.I.; See 1/20/12, Page 11). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=22-19 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 6 (2012)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2022-19 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 7%20(2012)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>Insurer Tells Court Arbitration Awards Should Not Be Vacated</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[NEW YORK - A group of insurers in a Jan. 19 filing tells a New York federal court that its reinsurer failed to meet its burden of proof in its contention that certain arbitration awards be vacated (Century Indemnity Company, et al. v. AXA Belgium [f/k/a Royal Belge Incendie Reassurance], No. 11-cv-07263, S.D. N.Y.; See 12/9/11, Page 9). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=22-19 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 7 (2012)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2022-19 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 8%20(2012)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>Reinsurer, Reinsured Spar Over Late Notice Provision Of Reinsurance Agreement</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[TRENTON, N.J. - A reinsurer and its reinsured argued in briefs filed in a New Jersey federal court on Jan. 27 over whether the reinsurer was prejudiced by the reinsured's late notice regarding liabilities incurred under a workers' compensation excess of loss reinsurance agreement (Munich Reinsurance America, Inc. v. American National Insurance Company, No. 09-0-cv-06435, D. N.J.; See 5/17/11, Page 7). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=22-19 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 8 (2012)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>

<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2022-18 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 1%20(2012)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>Judge Confirms Arbitration Award For Insurer Against French Reinsurer</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[NEW YORK - After a French corporation that succeeded two reinsurers failed to oppose a petition to confirm an arbitration award issued in favor of an insurer that sought recovery under contracts entered into in the 1970s, a New York federal judge on Jan. 9 found that no material issues of fact existed and confirmed the award (Ace Property &amp; Casualty Insurance Co., et al. v. AXA Re, No. 11 Civ. 7050, S.D. N.Y.; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2360). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=22-18 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 1 (2012)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2022-18 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 2%20(2012)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>N.Y. Federal Judge Confirms Arbitration Award In Asbestos Reinsurance Dispute</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[NEW YORK - Noting that there was no opposition to a final arbitration award issued by a panel regarding certain asbestos-related losses, a federal judge in New York on Jan. 10 granted confirmation of the award (Century Indemnity Company v. Equitas Insurance Limited, et al., No. 11-cv-01040, S.D. N.Y.; See 3/4/11, Page 11). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=22-18 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 2 (2012)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2022-18 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 3%20(2012)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>California Panel Says Insurer Cannot Challenge Jury Instruction It Had Approved</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[SAN FRANCISCO - Finding that an insurer had approved a trial court jury instruction regarding the statute of limitations for bringing suit regarding a pair of reinsurers' denial of coverage, a California appellate panel on Jan. 13 affirmed a lower court and said the insurer cannot now challenge the jury instruction on appeal (Transport Insurance Company v. TIG Insurance Company, et al., No. A122573, Calif. App., 1st Dist., 2nd Div.; 2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 21). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=22-18 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 3 (2012)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2022-18 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 4%20(2012)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>Surety Bond Holder To 2nd Circuit: Reinsurer Must Pay Claim Directly To Insured</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[NEW YORK - A defaulted-against surety bond holder says in its Jan. 6 Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals opening brief that a lower court judge erred in granting the bond's reinsurer's motion for judgment on the pleadings because the bond holder predicates its breach of contract claim on a materially ambiguous contractual term (Callon Petroleum Company v. National Indemnity Company, No. 11-0241, 2nd Cir.; See 11/4/11, Page 12). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=22-18 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 4 (2012)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2022-18 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 5%20(2012)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>Ala. Federal Judge: Company Was Reinsurance Broker, Not Managing General Agent</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[MONTGOMERY, Ala. - Holding that a company acted as reinsurance broker to an insurer and not as its managing general agent, a federal judge in Alabama on Jan. 9 found that a jury's verdict to the contrary was unreasonable (Alabama Municipal Insurance Corporation v. Alliant Insurance Services, Inc., No. 09-cv-00928, M.D. Ala.; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2481). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=22-18 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 5 (2012)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2022-18 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 6%20(2012)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>Insurer, Reinsurer End Asbestos-Related Reinsurance Case In Conn. Federal Court</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[NEW HAVEN, Conn. - An insurer and a reinsurer said in a Connecticut federal court on Jan. 11 that they are ending their asbestos personal-injury-related reinsurance dispute (Travelers Casualty and Surety Company v. Factory Mutual Insurance Company, No. 11-cv-0216, D. Conn.; See 9/16/11, Page 9). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=22-18 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 6 (2012)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2022-18 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 7%20(2012)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>Insurer Asks N.C. Federal Court To Assign Umpire In $704,729 Reinsurance Dispute</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[CHARLOTTE, N.C. - An insurer sued its reinsurer in a North Carolina federal court on Jan. 4, asking the court to appoint an umpire in an asbestos-related reinsurance arbitration (Arrowood Indemnity Company, f/k/a Royal Indemnity Company v. Harper Insurance Company, f/k/a Turegum Insurance Company, No. 12-cv-00002, W.D. N.C.). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=22-18 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 7 (2012)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2022-18 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 8%20(2012)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>Insurer To N.C. Federal Court: Reinsurer Will Not Cooperate In Umpire Selection</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[CHARLOTTE, N.C. - Claiming that a lapse has occurred in the umpire selection process of an asbestos-related reinsurance arbitration, an insurer sued its reinsurer on Jan. 4 in a North Carolina federal court and asked the court to appoint an umpire (Arrowood Indemnity Company, f/k/a Royal Indemnity Company v. Harper Insurance Company, f/k/a Turegum Insurance Company, No. 12-cv-00003, W.D. N.C.). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=22-18 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 8 (2012)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2022-18 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 9%20(2012)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>Reinsurer Tells R.I. Federal Court Insurers' Claims Should Not Be Severed</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[PROVIDENCE, R.I. - A reinsurer told a Rhode Island federal court on Jan. 17 that it would be prejudiced if the asbestos reinsurance-related claims brought by a pair of insurers are severed into two separate actions (Seaton Insurance Company, formerly known as Unigard Mutual Insurance Company, et al. v. Clearwater Insurance Company formerly known as Skandia America Reinsurance Corporation, No. 09-cv-00516, D. R.I.; See 1/10/12, Page 9). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=22-18 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 9 (2012)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>

<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2022-17 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 1%20(2012)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>N.Y. Panel Cites Pollution Coverage Exclusions In Vacation Of Reinsurance Ruling</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[NEW YORK - A New York appellate panel on Dec. 27 vacated a judgment of a lower court in a pollution-related reinsurance dispute, holding that a Delaware Superior Court decision regarding certain pollution coverage exclusions presents issues of material fact that the lower court should consider (American Home Assurance Company, et al. v. Everest Reinsurance Company, et al., No. 602485/06 6431, N.Y. Sup., App. Div., 1st Dept.; 2011 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9373). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=22-17 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 1 (2012)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2022-17 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 2%20(2012)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>2nd Circuit Denies Expedited Hearing In Arbitration Counsel Dispute</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[NEW YORK - The Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Dec. 29 denied a reinsurer's motion to expedite its appeal of a lower court's disqualification of its counsel in an asbestos-related arbitration dispute (Northwestern National Insurance Company v. INSCO, Ltd., No. 11-4626, 2nd Cir.). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=22-17 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 2 (2012)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2022-17 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 3%20(2012)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>Parties Spar Over Reinsurance Arbitration Umpire Selection In N.Y. Federal Court</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[NEW YORK - The parties to a number of reinsurance arbitrations argued in a New York federal court over umpire selection, with the reinsurer contending in a Dec. 23 brief that there has not been a lapse in the umpire selection process and, therefore, the court should not compel the parties to choose an umpire (Century Indemnity Company, as Successor to CCI Insurance Company, as Successor to Insurance Company of North America v. Everest Reinsurance Company, No. 11-cv-08362, S.D. N.Y.; See 12/23/11, Page 6). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=22-17 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 3 (2012)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2022-17 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 4%20(2012)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>Insurer Tells 3rd Circuit That Judge Correctly Held Pa. Law Rules Reinsurance</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[PHILADELPHIA - An insurer tells the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in a Jan. 4 brief that a lower court judge correctly applied Pennsylvania law to a reinsurance contract dispute and that its reinsurer waived its right to argue otherwise (Pacific Employers Insurance Co. v. Global Reinsurance Corporation of America, No. 11-3234 and 11-3262, 3rd Cir.; See 12/23/11, Page 5). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=22-17 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 4 (2012)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2022-17 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 5%20(2012)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>Insurer In Mass. Court: Reinsurer Owes $1.5M From Hazardous Waste Settlement</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[BOSTON - An insurer sued its reinsurer for $1,588,413 in relation to a hazardous waste claims settlement on Dec. 27 in a Massachusetts federal court (OneBeacon American Insurance Company v. Munich Reinsurance America, Inc., No. 11-cv-12313, D. Mass.). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=22-17 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 5 (2012)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2022-17 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 6%20(2012)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>Insurer Asks Rhode Island Federal Court To Sever Its Claims Against Reinsurer</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[PROVIDENCE, R.I. - An insurer asked a Rhode Island federal court on Dec. 30 to sever its claims against a reinsurer from those of another insurer now that the two insurers are no longer under the same ownership and management (Seaton Insurance Company, formerly known as Unigard Mutual Insurance Company, et al. v. Clearwater Insurance Company formerly known as Skandia America Reinsurance Corporation, No. 09-cv-00516, D. R.I.; See 9/17/10, Page 8). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=22-17 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 6 (2012)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2022-17 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 7%20(2012)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>Reinsurer, Reinsured Drop $2 Million Asbestos Claims-Related Reinsurance Dispute</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[NEW YORK - A reinsurer and its reinsured told a New York federal court on Dec. 23 that they agreed to end their dispute over a $2,116,530.15 asbestos claims related reinsurance billing (White Mountains Reinsurance Company of America v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company, No. 11-cv-00390, S.D. N.Y.; See 4/15/11, Page 6). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=22-17 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 7 (2012)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2022-17 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 8%20(2012)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>Parties Drop Asbestos-Related Reinsurance Dispute In Pennsylvania Federal Court</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[PHILADELPHIA - Parties to an asbestos personal injuries-related reinsurance litigation told a Pennsylvania federal court on Jan. 4 that they are dropping their suit (Appalachian Insurance Company v. Insurance Company of North America, No. 10-cv-07614, E.D. Pa.; See 3/4/11, Page 10). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=22-17 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 8 (2012)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>
 
<item>
<link>http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2022-17 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 9%20(2012)%20%22&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&amp;relativeDateValue=NONE&amp;fromDate=&amp;toDate=&amp;loc=mealeysrss</link>
<title>Reinsurer To Conn. Federal Court: New Information Has Come To Light Since Order</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[NEW HAVEN, Conn. - A reinsurer said in support of its motion for reconsideration of a discovery order on Jan. 3 that its motion is proper because of new information that has come to light (Travelers Casualty &amp; Surety Co. v. Century Indemnity Co., No. 10-cv-00400, D. Conn.; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 132131; See 12/9/11, Page 13). 
<a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;keyenum=25271&amp;keytnum=0&amp;searchtype=get&amp;search=22-17 Mealey's Litig. Rep. Reinsurance 9 (2012)&amp;view=full&amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank">Full story on lexis.com</a>]]>
</description>
</item>

</channel>

</rss> 


