>
>
>
The absence of "different" from UCC § 2-207(2) may undermine the principle that the "offeror is the master of the offer." Dr. John E. Murray, Jr. on Tyco Elecs. Corp. v. Milwaukee Elec. Tool Co., 2012 U. S. Dist. LEXIS 145212 (M. D. Pa. 2012). (PDF)
If the response to an offer is a definite expression of acceptance with different or additional non-dickered terms forming a contract under UCC § 2-207(1), what is to be done with the "different or additional" terms?
Availability: In Stock
|
|
||||||||||
The item you are trying to order is restricted to a quantity of 1 per order. Please complete the current order and place a new order for additional copy.

