• Administrative Law Anthology, 1994
 
 
Shop by Jurisdiction
Shop by Practice Area
Shop Products
View ALM Products

View a different catalog:
Administrative Law Anthology, 1994

Administrative Law Anthology, 1994

Thomas O. Sargentich, Professor of Law and Co-Director, Program on Law and Government, American University, Washington College of Law


Availability: In Stock
Publisher :Anderson Publishing
Format: softcover; 451 pp. , BOOK

ISBN: 9780870848032

1994
 
$48.00
Less More




    The field of Administrative Law is engaged in a broad range of debates about fundamental premises, including controversies about how to interpret statutes, how much deference a court should give to an agency's interpretation of a statute, what values should be stressed in the doctrine of procedural due process, and the appropriate relationships of agencies with courts, Congress, and the President. The Administrative Law Anthology provides perspectives on doctrine that are difficult to gain from the cases alone. Each section has a short introduction summarizing the excerpts. In a basic course, student understanding of cases is enriched by reading the first two excerpts in a section, which generally present competing views. Additional readings provide material for those seeking to go more deeply into particular subjects. Each section also has a bibliography.

    Professors and adjunct professors may request complimentary examination copies of LexisNexis law school publications to consider for class adoption or recommendation. Please identify the book(s) you wish to receive, provide your institutional contact information, and submit your request here.

    Preface xi

    PART I Major Controversies Implicating the Dominant Rule of Law Vision of Administrative Legitimacy 1

    A. Controversies About Substantive Legal Limits on Agencies 1

    1. The Debate About Reviving the Delegation Doctrine 1

    Theodore J. Lowi, Two Roads to Serfdom: Liberalism, Conservatism and Administrative Power, 36 AM. U. L. REV. 295 (1987) 3

    Richard B. Stewart, Beyond Delegation Doctrine, 36 AM. U. L. REV. 323 (1987) 9

    Thomas 0. Sargentich, The Delegation Debate and Competing Ideals of the Administrative Process, 36 AM. U. L REV. 419 (1987) 14

    Jerry L. Mashaw, Prodelegation: Why Administrators Should Make Political Decisions,1 J. LAW. ECON. & ORGAN. 81 (1985) 20

    Additional Sources 27

    2. Debates About the Interpretation of Statutory Authorizations of Agencies 28

    a. Statutory Interpretation in General 28

    William N. Eskridge, Jr., Dynamic Statutory Interpretation, 135 U. PA. L. REV., 1479 (1987) 29

    Nicholas S. Zeppos, Judicial Candor and Statutory Interpretation, 78 GEO. L.J. 353 (1989) 36

    Cass R. Sunstein, Interpreting Statutes in the Regulatory State, 103 HARV. L. REV. 405 (1989) 42

    Stephen Breyer, On the Uses of Legislative History in Interpreting Statutes, 65 S. CAL. L. REV. 845 (1992) 44

    Additional Sources 53

    b. Judicial Deference to Agency Interpretations 55

    Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Chevron and its Aftermath: Judicial Review of Agency Interpretations of Statutory Provisions, 41 VAND. L. REV. 301 (1988) 56

    Thomas W. Merrill, Judicial Deference to Executive Precedent, 101 YALE L.J. 969 (1992) 59

    Antonin Scalia, Judicial Deference to Administrative Interpretations of Law, 1989 DUKE L.J. 511 69

    Cynthia R. Farina, Statutory Interpretation and the Balance of Power in the Administrative State, 89 COLUM. L. REV. 452 (1989) 71

    Additional Sources 80

    B. Controversies About Procedural Legal Limits on Agencies 81

    1. Debates About Procedural Due Process 81

    Edward L. Rubin, Due Process and the Administrative State, 72 CAL. L. REV. 1044 (1984) 82

    Jerry L. Mashaw, The Supreme Court's Due Process Calculus for Administrative Adjudication in Mathews v. Eldridge: Three Factors in Search of a Theory of Value, 44 U. CHI. L. REV. 28 (1976) 97

    Cynthia R. Farina, Conceiving Due Process, 3 YALE J.L. & FEMINISM 189 (1991) 108

    Additional Sources 128

    2. The Debate About Nonlegislative Rule Exemptions to Notice-and-Comment Rulemaking Procedures 130

    Robert A. Anthony, Interpretive Rules, Policy Statements, Guidances, Manuals, and the Like - Should Federal Agencies Use Them to Bind the Public?, 41 DUKE L.J. 1311 (1992) 131

    Peter L. Strauss, The Rulemaking Continuum, 41 DUKE L.J. 1463 (1992) 137

    Michael Asimow, Nonlegislative Rulemaking and Regulatory Reform, 1985 DUKE L.J. 381 142

    Additional Sources 149

    3. The Debate About Alternative Dispute Resolution In Administrative Procedure 150

    Philip J. Harter, Negotiating Regulations: A Cure for Malaise, 71 GEO. L.J. 1 (1982) 151

    William Funk, When Smoke Gets in Your Eyes: Regulatory Negotiation and the Public Interest - EPA's Woodstove Standards, 18 ENVTL. L. 55 (1987) 153

    Philip J. Harter, Points on a Continuum: Dispute Resolution Procedures and the Administrative Process, 1 ADMIN. L.J. 141 (1987) 159

    Owen M. Fiss, Against Settlement, 93 YALE L.J. 1073 (1984) 161

    Additional Sources 164

    PART II Major Controversies Implicating Other Visions of Administrative Legitimacy 165

    A. Controversies About the Instrumental Rationality of Administration In the Pursuit of Public Values 165

    1. The Debate About Comprehensive Regulatory Analysis 165

    Thomas 0. McGarity, Regulatory Analysis and Regulatory Reform, 65 TEX L. REV. 1243 (1987) 166

    Steven Kelman, Cost-Benefit Analysis: An Ethical Critique, REGULATION 33 (Jan./Feb. 1981) 177

    Additional Sources 183

    2. The Debate About Judicial Assessment of the Rationality of Agency Decisionmaking: Hard-Look Review 184

    Merrick B. Garland, Deregulation and Judicial Review, 98 HARV. L. REV. 505 (1985) 185

    Stephen Breyer, Judicial Review of Questions of Law and Policy, 38 ADMIN. L. REV. 363 (1986) 195

    Sidney A. Shapiro and Richard E. Levy, Heightened Scrutiny of the Fourth Branch: Separation of Powers and the Requirement of Adequate Reasons for Agency Decisions, 1987 DUKE L.J. 387 200

    Additional Sources 208

    B. Controversies About the Openness and Political Oversight of Administration In the Pursuit of a More Democratic Process 209

    1. Debates About Openness In Government: Freedom of Information 209

    Antonin Scalia, The Freedom of Information Act Has No Clothes, REGULATION 15 (March/April 1982) 210

    Patricia M. Wald, The Freedom of Information Act: A Short Case Study in the Perils and Paybacks of Legislating Democratic Values, 33 EMORY L.J. 649 (1984) 211

    Robert G. Vaughn, Federal Information Policy and Administrative Law, in HANDBOOK ON REGULATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW 467 (David Rosenbloom & Richard Schwartz eds., 1994) 216

    Additional Sources 227

    2. Debates About the Supervision of Agencies by Congress 227

    a. The Legislative Veto of Administrative Action 227

    Harold H. Bruff and Ernest Gellhorn, Congressional Control of Administrative Regulation: A Study of Legislative Vetoes, 90 HARV. L. REV. 1369 (1977) 228

    E. Donald Elliott, INS v. Chadha: The Administrative Constitution, the Constitution, and the Legislative Veto, 1983 SUP. CT. REV. 125 234

    Stephen Breyer, The Legislative Veto After Chadha, 72 GEO. L.J. 785 (1984) 241

    Additional Sources 243

    b. Congressional Oversight of Administrative Action 245

    James B. Pearson, Oversight: A Vital Yet Neglected Congressional Function, 23 KAN. L. REV. 277 (1975) 246

    Peter M. Shane, Legal Disagreement and Negotiation in a Government of Laws: The Case of Executive Privilege Claims Against Congress, 71 MINN. L. REV. 461 (1987) 247

    Additional Sources 261

    3. The Debate About the Supervision of Agency Rulemaking by the President 262

    Harold H. Bruff, Presidential Management of Agency Rulemaking, 57 GEO. WASH. L. REV. 533 (1989) 263

    Alan B. Morrison, OMB Interference with Agency Rulemaking: The Wrong Way to Write a Regulation, 99 HARV. L, REV. 1059 (1986) 269

    Peter L. Strauss and Cass R. Sunstein, The Role of the President and OMB in Informal Rulemaking, 38 ADMIN. L. REV. 181 (1986) 271

    Charles Tiefer, The Quayle Council: "No Fingerprints" on Regulation, in THE SEMI-SOVEREIGN PRESIDENCY: THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION'S STRATEGY FOR GOVERNING WITHOUT CONGRESS 61 (1994) 274

    Additional Sources 279

    4. Debates About the Constitutional System of the Separation of Powers 281

    a. The Constitutional Position of Administrative Agencies 281

    Geoffrey P. Miller, Independent Agencies, 1986 SUP. CT. REV. 41 282

    Peter M. Shane, Independent Policy making and Presidential Power: A Constitutional Analysis, 57 GEO. WASH. L. REV. 596 (1989) 296

    Peter L. Strauss, The Place of Agencies in Government: Separation of Powers and the Fourth Branch, 84 COLUMN. L. REV. 573 (1984) 300

    Additional Sources 311

    b. The Parliamentary Critique of the Separation of Powers 313

    Lloyd N. Cutler, To Form a Government, in SEPARATION OF POWERS: DOES IT STILL WORK? 1 (Robert A. Goldwin & Art Kaufman eds., 1986) 314

    Thomas 0. Sargentich, The Limits of the Parliamentary Critique of the Separation of Powers, 34 WM. & MARY L. REV. 679 (1993) 321

    Addtional Sources 334

    Part III Other Major Controversies About the Role of Courts Implicating Competing Visions of Administrative Legitimacy 335

    A. The Controversy About the Reviewability of Agency Decisionmaking 335

    Ronald M. Levin, Understanding Unreviewability in Administrative Law, 74 MINN. L. REV. 689 (1990) 336

    Additional Sources 344

    B. The Controversy About the Plaintiff's Standing to Sue an Agency 345

    Antonin Scalia, The Doctrine of Standing as an Essential Element of the Separation of Powers, 17 SUFFOLK U. L. REV. 881 (1983) 347

    Cass R. Sunstein, What's Standing After Lujan? Of Citizen Suits, "Injuries," and Article ///, 91 MICH. L. REV. 163 (1992) 349

    William A. Fletcher, The Structure of Standing, 98 YALE L.J. 221 (1988) 360

    Gene R. Nichol, Jr., Rethinking Standing, 72 CAL. L. REV. 68 (1984) 363

    Additional Sources 366

    C. The Controversy About Agency Nonacquiescence to Judicial Rulings 367

    Samuel Estreicher and Richard L. Revesz, Nonacquiescence by Federal Administrative Agencies, 98 YALE L.J. 679 (1989) 368

    Matthew Diller and Nancy Morawetz, Intracircuit Nonacquiescence and the Breakdown of the Rule of Law, A Response to Estreicher and Revesz, 99 YALE L.J. 801 (1990) 377

    Additional Sources 381

    D. The General Controversy About the Role of Courts In Administrative Law 382

    Keith Werhan, The Neoclassical Revival in Administrative Law, 44 ADMIN. L. REV. 567 (1992) 383

    R. Shep Melnick, Administrative Law and Bureaucratic Reality, 44 ADMIN. L. REV. 245 (1992) 392

    Additional Sources 396

    Part IV Competing Theoretical Perspectives on the Administrative Process 397

    George J. Stigler, The Theory of Economic Regulation, 2 BELL J. OF ECON. & MGMT. SCI. 3 (1971) 399

    Mark Seidenfeld, A Civic Republican Justification for the Bureaucratic State, 105 HARV. L. REV. 1511 (1992) 404

    Gerald E. Frug, The Ideology of Bureaucracy in American Law, 97 HARV. L. REV. 1276 (1984) 412

    Thomas 0. Sargentich, The Reform of the American Administrative Process: The Contemporary Debate, 1984 WIS. L. REV. 385 432

    Additional Sources 450

     

    Thomas O. Sargentich


     

Free Standard Shipping for Students
The item you are trying to order is restricted to a quantity of 1 per order. Please complete the current order and place a new order for additional copy.
We are currently experiencing difficulties in adding this product to the cart. Please contact customer support at 1-800-543-6862 for assistance. You may continue to shop for other products in the store.