• Castellano on Williams v. Illinois: Fractured Supreme Court Approves Introduction Under Confrontation Clause of Expert Testimony Relying on Others' DNA Reports (PDF)
 
 
Shop by Jurisdiction
Shop by Practice Area
Shop Products
View ALM Products

View a different catalog:
Castellano on Williams v. Illinois: Fractured Supreme Court Approves Introduction Under Confrontation Clause of Expert Testimony Relying on Others' DNA Reports (PDF)

Castellano on Williams v. Illinois: Fractured Supreme Court Approves Introduction Under Confrontation Clause of Expert Testimony Relying on Others' DNA Reports (PDF)

In a fractured decision with no single supporting rationale, the Supreme Court in Williams v. Illinois has interpreted the Confrontation Clause to allow expert DNA comparison testimony that relies on DNA reports prepared by non-testifying witnesses.


Availability: In Stock
Publisher :LexisNexis Emerging Issues Analysis
Format: Electronic, 8 Pages , PDF

ISBN: 9781422429983

7/24/2012
 
$57.00
Less More




    In a fractured decision with no single supporting rationale, the Supreme Court in Williams v. Illinois has interpreted the Confrontation Clause to allow expert DNA comparison testimony that relies on DNA reports prepared by non-testifying witnesses. In this EIA, John M. Castellano, a 29-year-veteran of criminal practice, analyzes the legal significance of the ruling, its practical impact, and ways to approach similar issues.

     

    John M. Castellano is Deputy Executive for the Legal Affairs Division in the District Attorney's Office in Queens, New York, where he has been in charge of the Appeals Bureau for more than 16 years. In that capacity, he has supervised thousands of criminal cases prosecuted at every level of state and federal court. He has personally briefed, edited, or argued over 80 cases in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and has argued before the Supreme Court of the United States. The New York State District Attorney's Association named him Appellate Prosecutor of the Year in 2005. He has also written for the treatise Criminal Law Advocacy, published by LexisNexis, and is General Editor of the Practice Insights for the New York Penal Law and Criminal Procedure Law published by LexisNexis. The views expressed in this commentary are solely his own.

     

    Ask the LexisNexis experts - and get a complete answer based on today's law.

     

    An authoritative analysis of important cases, codes, statutes, rulings, emerging issues or legal topics is available now - through LexisNexis Emerging Issues Analysis. The brain trust of LexisNexis authors - thousands of recognized authorities who develop the respected Matthew Bender®, Mealey's and Martindale-Hubbell® treatises and articles - produce this highly specific content. Each commentary covers an important case, code, statute, ruling or emerging issue such as subprime, nanotechnology, or climate change. More current and concentrated than treatises and more analytical than news, Emerging Issues Analysis bridges the information gap between the two, providing quick expert analysis of current developments in law.

     

    Emerging Issues Analysis PDFs should be purchased individually or accessed through Lexis.com if you have a subscription.

     

    (6559)

     

     

 
The item you are trying to order is restricted to a quantity of 1 per order. Please complete the current order and place a new order for additional copy.
We are currently experiencing difficulties in adding this product to the cart. Please contact customer support at 1-800-543-6862 for assistance. You may continue to shop for other products in the store.