LexisNexis® CLE On-Demand features premium content from partners like American Law Institute Continuing Legal Education and Pozner & Dodd. Choose from a broad listing of topics suited for law firms, corporate legal departments, and government entities. Individual courses and subscriptions available.
So it looks like David Murdock, Dole's CEO and 40%
shareholder, is putting in an offer to take Dole Foods private at $12/share. According to the WSJ, this offer is subject to two
conditions: 1) that a majority of the disinterested directors approve it;
and 2) that it be approved by a majority of the minority shareholders.
Why would Murdock make it clear in his initial offer to
the board that he has those two conditions? Isn't that for the board to
decide? Well, it looks like Murdock's lawyers have been up late reading.
Remember In re MFW S'holders Litigation from 10 days ago.
Chancellor Strine is trying to bring some order to the question of
standards of review of transactions involving controlling shareholders.
In MFW he provided Murdock and his lawyers the following bit of help:
When a controlling stockholder merger has, from the time
of the controller's first overture, been subject to:
(i) negotiation and approval by a special committee of
independent directors fully empowered to say no, and
(ii) approval by an uncoerced, fully informed vote of a majority of the
the business judgment rule standard of review applies.
And that's what Murdock is setting up for here. By
relying on robust procedural protections Murdock is hoping to get the
deferential business judgment standard to apply to his deal to take Dole
private. So will will this get litigated? Well, yes. So, a
very quick first test for Chancellor Strine's unified approach.
Visit the M&A Law Prof
Blog, hosted by Brian JM Quinn, for blogs on legal developments in
corporate governance and mergers & acquisitions.
more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us
through our corporate site.