LexisNexis® CLE On-Demand features premium content from partners like American Law Institute Continuing Legal Education and Pozner & Dodd. Choose from a broad listing of topics suited for law firms, corporate legal departments, and government entities. Individual courses and subscriptions available.
Martinez v. E.I. duPont de Nemours & Co., Inc., Del. Supr., No. 669, 2012 (Feb. 20, 2014) [an enhanced version of this opinion is available to lexis.com subscribers].
Why One Should Care About This Decision: This Delaware Supreme Court opinion clarifies the “overwhelming hardship” standard applicable to the law of forum non conveniens and the related Cryo-Maid factors, and affirms a trial court decision that is one of the less common instances in which a case was dismissed in Delaware on the basis of a forum non conveniens argument. The facts involve claims by plaintiffs from Argentina, as well as a DuPont subsidiary in that country and issues relating to the law of Argentina. (Hence the flag of Argentina.)
This decision is must reading for anyone who needs to know the latest iteration of Delaware law on the topic of forum non conveniens. This opinion is also noteworthy for its feature of a rare and spirited dissent in an opinion of the Delaware Supreme Court. The dissenting opinion in this case describes the majority as reversing decades of stare decisis on the law of forum non conveniens, and having an unstated purpose of protecting Delaware’s corporate franchise in reaching its conclusion.
Read more Delaware business litigation case summaries and commentary on Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation Blog, a blog hosted by Francis G.X. Pileggi, of Eckert Seamans.
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site.