LexisNexis® CLE On-Demand features premium content from partners like American Law Institute Continuing Legal Education and Pozner & Dodd. Choose from a broad listing of topics suited for law firms, corporate legal departments, and government entities. Individual courses and subscriptions available.
The Uniform Commercial Code
itself, scholarly articles, and judicial decisions have long emphasized the
importance of the debtor's name on an Article 9 financing statement. The
debtor's name is one of only three pieces of information absolutely required on
a filed financing statement, and it is undoubtedly the most critical piece of
information. See U.C.C. § 9-502 (a) (Official Version 2009) (also
requiring the secured party's or its representative's name and an indication of
the collateral). The debtor's name is the gateway to the public filing system:
searchers seeking information about possible prior security interests will
access the filing system by entering a search request under the debtor's name.
Notwithstanding the critical importance of the debtor's name, the 2001 revision
to U.C.C. Article 9 left this element somewhat ambiguous, particularly where
individual debtors are involved. Thus, the current version of Article 9 simply
requires that for individual debtors, the filing secured party should use that
individual's "name." U.C.C. § 9-503 (a)(4)(A). As a result, courts
have struggled to determine whether secured parties complied with the statute
when they filed financing statements listing the debtor under a nickname, using
a variant spelling of the debtor's name, or setting forth a non-Anglo name in
accordance with typical English conventions. See Clark v. Deere & Co. (In re Kinderknecht), 308 B.R.
71(B.A.P. 10th Cir. 2004); Nazar v. Bucklin Nat'l Bank (In re Erwin), Nos.
02-10227, 02-5176, 2003 Bankr. LEXIS 692 (Bankr. D. Kan. June 27, 2003); Corona Fruits & Veggies, Inc. v. Frozsun Foods, Inc.,
143 Cal. App. 4th 319, 48 Cal. Rptr. 3d 868 (2006); All Business Corp. v. Choi, 634 S.E.2d 400 (Ga. Ct.
App. 2006); Pankratz
Implement Co. v. Citizens Nat'l Bank, 130 P.3d 57 (Kan. 2006).
In 2010, the U.C.C. drafters promulgated proposed amendments to Article 9
designed to address some of the worrisome issues created by the 2001 version of
the statute. Although these amendments have not yet received full approval, it
is likely that they will be passed in final form in Fall 2010. One of the major
proposed revisions focuses on the appropriate name of a debtor to be used on a
filing financing statement. Although the draft provisions amend debtor name
requirements for registered organizations, estates, and trusts, this comment
will concentrate on the amendments relating to individual debtor names.
As mentioned previously, Article 9 in its current form states that a financing
statement "sufficiently provides that name of the debtor . . . if the
debtor has a name, only if it provides the individual or organizational name of
the debtor." U.C.C. § 9-503 (a)(4)(A). The 2010 amendments offer two
alternative provisions applying to individual debtor names. Under Alternative
A, the secured party is directed to use the name of an individual debtor as
indicated on his/her unexpired driver's license issued by "this
State." U.C.C. § 9-503 (a)(4) (Draft Alt. A 2010). If the debtor does not
have an unexpired driver's license issued by "this State," then the
secured party should provide the "individual name of the debtor or the
surname and first personal name of the debtor." U.C.C. § 9-503 (a)(5)
(Draft Alt. A 2010).
Access the full version of "2010 Amendments to Article 9:
Debtor's Name on Financing Statements" with your lexis.com ID
If you do not have a lexis.com ID, you can
purchase the Emerging Issues Analysis content through our Research Value Packages