LexisNexis® CLE On-Demand features premium content from partners like American Law Institute Continuing Legal Education and Pozner & Dodd. Choose from a broad listing of topics suited for law firms, corporate legal departments, and government entities. Individual courses and subscriptions available.
CHICAGO - The Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals has ruled that ousted frac sand supplier Minerals Development & Supply Company can sue in state court the law firm of Hunton & Williams and its clients Superior Silica Sands LLC and its owners for their alleged fraudulent activity, overturning a Wisconsin court decision that dismissed the $150 million case last year, according to a law firm press release (Minerals Development & Supply v. Hunton & Williams LLP, et al., No. 11-3460, 7th Cir.).
According to a news release from Konicek & Dillon, P.C. Attorney at Law:
Ousted supplier claims attorneys from Hunton & Williams, a Virginia based law firm, allegedly tortiously interfered with its supply of frac sand while Hunton & Williams was representing Superior Silica Sands LLC and its owners, Insight Equity, a Southlake, Texas, private equity firm.
Shortly after the supplier was ousted, Superior Silica Sands LLC built a new frac sand processing facility of its own in New Auburn, Wis. The ousted supplier has sued Hunton & Williams and their clients for $150 million, the amount of the contract. Attorneys are further seeking punitive damages for Hunton & Williams and Superior Silica Sands alleged fraudulent activities.
Minerals Development & Supply Company will be filing an amended complaint in state court adding Lester Pines of Cullen Weston Pines & Bach, a Madison, Wis., law firm representing Hunton & Williams, as a defendant for his failure to disclose his relationship with former Appellate Judge Gordon Myse in an arbitration matter concerning the parties.
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions, connect with us through our corporate site.