Not a Lexis+ subscriber? Try it out for free.
LexisNexis® CLE On-Demand features premium content from partners like American Law Institute Continuing Legal Education and Pozner & Dodd. Choose from a broad listing of topics suited for law firms, corporate legal departments, and government entities. Individual courses and subscriptions available.
"The Republican-led states suing President Barack Obama over his executive order not to deport certain illegal immigrants lack standing because they "themselves are not subject" to the order, the Justice Department said Wednesday. Twenty red states, four Republican governors and Michigan's attorney general Bill Schuette, sued the Obama administration's immigration officials in early December. With Texas leading the charge, the states are challenging Obama's decision to not deport, for the remainder of his term, "certain low-priority aliens: those present in the United States since before 2010 and who either entered as children or are the parents of U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents," according to a Justice Department filing in the case. ... The feds responded on Christmas Eve Day with a 74-page opposing brief. Justice Department attorney Kyle Freeny says in the brief that the plaintiffs "seek to overturn and effectively commandeer federal enforcement prerogatives." "This effort cannot be reconciled with the Executive's well-recognized discretionary authority under the immigration laws to prioritize enforcement resources, including through grants of deferred action, or with the practical impossibility and humanitarian cost of removing every such alien regardless of consequence," Freeny wrote. "In any event, plaintiffs' case fails at the threshold, because plaintiffs lack standing." "Multiple layers of speculation" support the plaintiffs' assertion that Obama's order will harm them, Freeny added, urging Hanan to deny the motion for an injunction. The feds filed the document a day after U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell in Washington, D.C., denied Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio's motion for an injunction against Obama's order. "The plaintiff's case raises important questions regarding the impact of illegal immigration on this nation, but the questions amount to generalized grievances which are not proper for the judiciary to address," Howell wrote. The judge added that "the plaintiff lacks standing to bring this challenge to the constitutionality and legality of the immigration policies at issue." Freeny asked Hanen to follow Howell's lead and dismiss the Republican states' lawsuit." - Cameron Langford, CNS, Dec. 24, 2014.