LexisNexis® CLE On-Demand features premium content from partners like American Law Institute Continuing Legal Education and Pozner & Dodd. Choose from a broad listing of topics suited for law firms, corporate legal departments, and government entities. Individual courses and subscriptions available.
"Problems with a military-only DREAM Act range from the practical to
the philosophical. For example, Representative Rivera’s bill would
require people to enlist within nine months; otherwise they would lose
their eligibility under the bill. The bill fails to realize, however,
that people can’t start the enlistment process until they are legal and
have a social security number. It can take longer than nine months to
complete the enlistment process, and the military services have annual
quotas that get filled quickly when the economy is bad, forcing people
into the next fiscal year.
In addition, some potential enlistees may fail to qualify for medical
reasons. Suppose someone gets temporary status under the Rivera bill,
tries to enlist, and turns out to be colorblind. Do we tell them,
"Sorry, we are deporting you because you are colorblind. No refund of
the immigration fees you paid to start the DREAM Act process"?
The call for a military-only DREAM Act also poses moral problems. It
effectively tells undocumented noncitizens that they are only useful for
war, not for improving our economy through their hard work or inspiring
the next generation by teaching in our schools. Those professions are
just as noble as fighting for our country. As a new book, Green Card Stories, points out, people who legalize their status help this country in a variety of important ways." - Steve Yale-Loehr, Feb. 11, 2012.