When it comes to coverage principles this one is as black as coal: the duty to defend is broader than the duty to indemnify and if an insurer does not have a duty to defend, it does not have a duty to indemnify.
But in Texas it can be a different story...
Brian Margolies, Partner, Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
In its recent decision in City of Medford v. Argonaut Ins. Group, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86114 (D. Ore. June 21, 2012) , the United States District Court for the District of Oregon...
In a decision notable for several reasons [ enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers ], the New York State Court of Appeals—the state's highest court—reversed itself in K2 Investment Group, LLC v. American Guarantee & Liability...