LexisNexis® CLE On-Demand features premium content from partners like American Law Institute Continuing Legal Education and Pozner & Dodd. Choose from a broad listing of topics suited for law firms, corporate legal departments, and government entities. Individual courses and subscriptions available.
A company in New York State makes a verbal offer of
employment to an individual. Before the individual begins work, the
company's profits plummet or its budget is slashed.
If the company withdraws the oral offer of
employment, does the individual have a valid claim against the company for
breach of employment contract? To put it another way, are verbal
agreements of employment enforceable in New York?
The short answer is that if the oral agreement of
employment is for more than one year, it is within the Statute of Frauds and,
as a result, is not enforceable. If,
instead, the verbal agreement of employment is for a definite
duration of one year or less, it is enforceable. And if the oral
agreement of employment is not for a fixed duration, it is valid, but the
individual's employment presumptively is at will; that is, once the individual
begins work, either the company or the individual may terminate the
employment at any time.
New York's Statute of Frauds, N.Y. Gen. Oblig. Law §
5-701, requires certain types of agreements to be in
writing. New York's Statute of Frauds states in pertinent part:
"Every agreement, promise or undertaking is void, unless
it or some note or memorandum thereof be in writing, and subscribed by the
party to be charged therewith, or by his lawful agent, if such agreement,
promise or undertaking:
"1. By its terms is not to be performed within one
year from the making thereof."
N.Y. Gen. Oblig. Law § 5-701(a), 5-701(a)(1).
Thus, to be enforceable, a promise or agreement of
employment which by its terms cannot be performed within one year must be
memorialized in a writing signed by the party to be charged (here, the
company). So if the company orally assures the individual of, for
example, a five-year term of employment, that assurance, even if proven, is
void and unenforceable under New York's Statute of Frauds.
If the verbal agreement of employment is for a fixed
period of not more than one year, the verbal agreement is outside the scope of
N.Y. Gen. Oblig. Law § 5-701 and is enforceable. Where such an express
agreement of employment for a fixed term exists, the contract "may not lawfully
be terminated by the employer prior to the expiration date in the absence of
just cause." Alpern v. Hurwitz, 644 F.2d 943, 945 (2d Cir.
1981). So if, by way of example, the business and the individual
verbally agree upon a six-month term of employment, the business, absent just
cause, may not lawfully fire the individual before those six months have
If the verbal assurance of employment is not for a fixed
period of time, the verbal assurance is beyond the reach of N.Y. Gen. Oblig.
Law § 5-701 and is valid. However, because there is no agreement establishing
a fixed duration, the New York state courts generally will presume that the
employment is at will and may be terminated, by either the company or the
individual, at any time. To put it another way, if the company's and the
individual's verbal agreement of employment is not for a definite duration, it
is enforceable; but once the individual begins work, the company
presumptively may fire him at any time.
However, even if an oral agreement of employment does not
refer to "a determinable calendar date" and is not "precisely calculable," the
New York courts will deem the oral agreement to be of definite duration, and
thus to be terminable only for just cause, if "the boundaries of beginning
and end of the employment period are sufficiently ascertainable." Rooney
v. Tyson, 91 N.Y.2d 685, 692, 697 N.E.2d 571, 674 N.Y.S.2d 616 (N.Y.
1998). For example, in the Rooney case, the New York Court of
Appeals held that an oral agreement between a professional boxer and a fight
trainer to train the boxer "for as long as the boxer fights professionally" was
for a definite duration. The Rooney Court reasoned that the times
of commencement and conclusion of the fighter's professional boxing career "are
legally and experientially limited and ascertainable by objective benchmarks."
Rooney, 91 N.Y.2d at 692.
If your company needs assistance or guidance on a labor
or employment law issue and your company is located in the New York City area,
call Attorney David S. Rich at (212) 209-3972.
Visit the New York Business Litigation and Employment Attorneys Blog
for commentary regarding business litigation, employment, and securities
related legal issues.