LexisNexis® CLE On-Demand features premium content from partners like American Law Institute Continuing Legal Education and Pozner & Dodd. Choose from a broad listing of topics suited for law firms, corporate legal departments, and government entities. Individual courses and subscriptions available.
Well, at least that's what a federal court recently told
a defendant-employer in this ruling.
In Tompkins v. Detroit Metropolitan Airport, the
plaintiff suffered a slip-and-fall and later claimed back and other injuries.
She sued her employer, who subsequently demanded that Tompkins provide full
access to her Facebook account. Acknowledging that Facebook information that a
user shares only with a few Facebook friends may still be discoverable, the
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, emphasized
that there are limits to the Facebook discovery that a party may pursue:
[M]aterial posted on a "private"
Facebook page, that is accessible to a selected group of recipients but not
available for viewing by the general public, is generally not privileged, nor
is it protected by common law or civil law notions of privacy. Nevertheless,
the Defendant does not have a generalized right to rummage at will through
information that Plaintiff has limited from public view. [T]here must be a
threshold showing that the requested information is reasonably calculated to
lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.
As I've discussed on this blog many times before (e.g., here and here) employers may not engage in the proverbial fishing
expedition, in the hope that there might be something of relevance in a
plaintiff's Facebook account. The far better practice is to first lay a
foundation that the social-media account may contain relevant information and
then pursue that information or, if you're feeling lucking, full access to the
This article was originally published on Eric B. Meyer's blog, The Employer
For more information about LexisNexis
products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site.