LexisNexis® CLE On-Demand features premium content from partners like American Law Institute Continuing Legal Education and Pozner & Dodd. Choose from a broad listing of topics suited for law firms, corporate legal departments, and government entities. Individual courses and subscriptions available.
By Bennett B. Borden and Monica McCarroll
Judge Payne's Opinion in ePlus Inc. v. Lawson Software, Inc. is a "must-read" for all attorneys practicing in the E.D. Va. and a cautionary tale for all litigators. Judge Payne provides a primer as to what privilege is, when it can be asserted, and how it should be logged in order to preserve the privilege.
Protecting Privilege with Proper Claw-back Agreements
The heart of his Opinion addresses the defendant's attempt to "claw back" eight documents it claimed were disclosed inadvertently, even though they had been reviewed and branded "confidential" by the producing party. Judge Payne examined the language of the claw-back agreement which allowed for the clawing-back of privileged documents that had been "inadvertently" produced and held that, contrary to its claims, the defendant "intentionally produced these documents . . . and then realized it had mistakenly produced them." Unfortunately for the defendant, Judge Payne ruled that "the Protective Order does not cover 'mistakes.'" Not only did Judge Payne rule that the eight documents had to be produced, but that the privilege regarding the entire subject matter was waived.
The defendant could have avoided this result if it had incorporated the right language into the protective order. Fed. R. Evid. 502 was enacted in 2008 to protect not only "inadvertent" disclosure, but also intentional, albeit mistaken, disclosure like the disclosures at issue in this case. However, the protection applies only when the correct language is incorporated into a Court order. Rule 502 should always be considered when a litigant's production includes potentially privileged documents.
Proper Assertion of Privilege in Logs
Judge Payne's Opinion also details the defects in a privilege log that can lead to a waiver of privilege. In his Opinion, Judge Payne outlined the deficiencies of the privilege log produced by the defendant.
Thus, litigants in the Eastern District of Virginia should ensure that each privilege log entry contains the requisite information outlined in Judge Payne's Opinion to withstand privilege challenges. If you have any questions, please contact a member of the Williams Mullen eDiscovery and Information Governance Section.
With approximately 300 attorneys practicing in over 30 practice areas, Williams Mullen provides comprehensive legal services to regional, national and international clients. Their clients include multinational Fortune 500 companies, private family-owned businesses, nonprofit organizations and government entities. From offices in North Carolina, Virginia, Washington D.C. and London, Williams Mullen attorneys bring skills and experience to solving the legal needs of their diverse client base.
Please note: This newsletter contains general, condensed summaries of actual legal matters, statutes and opinions for information purposes. It is not meant to be and should not be construed as legal advice. Readers with particular needs on specific issues should retain the services of competent counsel. For more information, please visit our website at www.williamsmullen.com or contact Beth G. Hungate-Noland, 804.420.6913 or firstname.lastname@example.org or Joel R. Nied, 757.473.5342 or email@example.com. For mailing list inquiries or to be removed from this mailing list, please contact Julie Layne at firstname.lastname@example.org or 804.420.6311.
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site.