Not a Lexis+ subscriber? Try it out for free.
LexisNexis® CLE On-Demand features premium content from partners like American Law Institute Continuing Legal Education and Pozner & Dodd. Choose from a broad listing of topics suited for law firms, corporate legal departments, and government entities. Individual courses and subscriptions available.
Tuesday, July 22, 2014 To view the full text of these opinions, please visit: http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/index.cfm?fa=opinions.recent or Lexis subscribers may use the links below to access the cases on either lexis.com or Lexis Advance.
Division Two of the Court of Appeals filed 2 new published opinions and withdrew 1 opinion on Tuesday, July 22, 2014. No new published opinions were filed and no opinions were ordered published by Division Three of the Court of Appeals.
1. In re Estate of Henington No. 44246-9 (July 22, 2014) 2014 Wash. App. LEXIS 1797 (lexis.com)
2014 Wash. App. LEXIS 1797 (Lexis Advance)
Areas: DOMESTIC RELATIONS AND FAMILY LAW
Brief: The personal representative of the decedent's estate challenges the trial court's order closing the estate and distributing its assets to her heirs, arguing that the trial court erred when it denied three creditors' claims as time barred. The Court of Appeals holds that the filing of creditors' claims did not toll the statute of limitations; however, because there is insufficient evidence in the record regarding the exact nature of the claims, the court remands to the trial court to determine whether they are time barred.
2. Kreidler v. Cascade Nat'l Ins. Co. No. 44745-2 (July 22, 2014) 2014 Wash. App. LEXIS 1798 (lexis.com)
2014 Wash. App. LEXIS 1798 (Lexis Advance)
Areas: COURTS; EMPLOYMENT LAW; GOVERNMENT RELATIONS AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
Brief: The trial court properly granted summary judgment in favor of the Washington State Insurance Commissioner as receiver for the liquidated insurance company, rejecting the arguments that (1) the amount due to the Commissioner was overstated because the Commissioner failed to credit the insurance company's agent for certain set-offs and relied on a contractual formula that was imposed without the agent's knowledge, and (2) the Commissioner's expert witness lacked foundation.
3. In re Welfare of H.Q. No. 44649-9 (Filed March 25, 2014; withdrawn July 22, 2014)
About HeadsUp: Tell a friend to register online to subscribe to receive issues of the HeadsUp for Washington. To opt-out, unsubscribe or to stop receiving this communication, use this link. For questions or comments, please write: HeadsUp@lexisnexis.com. HeadsUp for Washington is brought to you by LexisNexis®, publisher of the Washington Official Reports.
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions, connect with us through our corporate site.