LexisNexis® CLE On-Demand features premium content from partners like American Law Institute Continuing Legal Education and Pozner & Dodd. Choose from a broad listing of topics suited for law firms, corporate legal departments, and government entities. Individual courses and subscriptions available.
By Matthew D. Murphey
Plaintiffs that included a former employee of an accused infringer who left the company to open his own competitive business, lost a bid for damages against cement manufacturer because of unreasonable delay in bringing the infringement suit. After ten years of litigation, which included an appeal that was granted by the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, and a four-week jury trial after the case was remanded that resulted in a hung jury, the Central District of California granted the defendant's post-trial motion and found the patent owner's claim was stale. In Ultimax Cement Mfg. Corp. v. CTS Cement Mfg. Corp., Case No. SACV 02-578AG, (C.D. Cal. 2012) [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers], the court ruled that despite the jury's inability to reach a decision, the evidence showed that a lengthy relationship between the companies and their principals was sufficient to put plaintiffs on notice that defendants' competing cement product sold after a patent was granted to the plaintiff could have infringed the plaintiff's patent, compelling the plaintiff to have brought suit well-before the twelve years it waited to do so. Ultimax highlights not only the importance of timely enforcing patent rights against known or suspected infringers, but of the difficulty in presenting complex patent cases to juries. "The jurors' task was very difficult. They were asked to absorb and apply significant amounts of complex evidence, without the background and contextual understanding often taken for granted by experts in the subject matter. Counsel for both sides also struggled to frame important issues and put the voluminous evidence - including weeks of highly technical testimony and more than 150 evidentiary exhibits - in context." Read the full opinion Ultimax Case
About Troutman Sanders
Troutman Sanders is an international law firm with offices in North America, Europe and Asia. Founded in 1897, the firm’s heritage of extensive experience, exceptional responsiveness and an unwavering commitment to service has garnered strong, long-standing relationships with clients across the globe. These clients range from multinational corporations to individual entrepreneurs, federal and state agencies to foreign governments, and non-profit organizations to businesses representing virtually every sector and industry.
Troutman Sanders lawyers provide counsel and advice in practically every aspect of civil and commercial law related to the firm’s core practice areas: Corporate, Finance, Litigation, Public Law and Real Estate. With more than 50 practice groups focused on specific aspects of these areas, the firm is defined by its considerable knowledge base and proactive approach to addressing legal and business challenges.
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions, connect with us through our corporate site.