LexisNexis® CLE On-Demand features premium content from partners like American Law Institute Continuing Legal Education and Pozner & Dodd. Choose from a broad listing of topics suited for law firms, corporate legal departments, and government entities. Individual courses and subscriptions available.
The SEC obtained an emergency order halting the diversion
of settlement payments from the Receiver of the Tom Petter's Ponzi schemes. The
money was intended to compensate defrauded investors of the feeder funds. The
man who operated the feeder funds and helped facilitate the Petter's fraud was
poised to obtain the money until the SEC won a freeze order. Absent the order
investors would have been paid nothing. SEC v. Quan, Case no.
0:11-cv-00723 (D. MN Filed March 24, 2011).
Defendant Marlon Quan is a hedge fund manager who
operated Acorn Capital Group, LLC and Stewardship Investment Advisors, LLC,
companies used to manage several hedge funds and both of whom are defendants.
From 2001 through 2008 Mr. Quan raised over $459,077,561from at least 165
investors. Those investors and entities invested in Mr. Quan's hedge funds.
During that period Mr. Quan and his entities were paid over $93 million in
From the beginning Mr. Quan's funds fed millions of
dollars of investor money to fraudster Tom Petters. Mr. Petters claimed to
operate funds in which investor money was supposedly used to finance the
purchase of merchandise for re-sale to "big box" retailers such as Wal-Mart and
Costco. In reality Mr. Petters operated a massive Ponzi scheme, the assets of
which have been seized by a Court appointed Receiver. During its operation
however the Petters funds received millions of dollars from Mr. Quan and his
funds in return for promissory notes.
When soliciting funds from investors Mr. Quan furnished
them written materials which assured that the big-box retailers were making
payments into a lock box which was controlled by one of his entities. He also
told investors that a major accounting firm was retained to examine the books
of the entities controlled by Mr. Petters, that there was insurance against
default and that proper due diligence had been undertaken. These
representations were false according to the Commission.
In 2007 when the Petters entities began to default on
their notes Mr. Quan and his entities commenced a cover-up, concealing the
truth from their investors. Those steps included falsely assuring investors
that the Quan funds were in sound financial condition when in fact they were
Perhaps the ultimate fraud began as the Receiver for the
Petters entities authorized the payment of $14 million which, according to the
complaint, "belongs to the investor-victims of the Defendants' fraud." Instead,
a Quan controlled entity negotiated a deal to obtain control of the funds and
distribute them to others, including to Mr. Quan's attorneys. The fund
investors would receive nothing.
The SEC's complaint alleges violations of Securities Act
Section 17(a), Exchange Act Section 10(b) and Advisers Act Sections 206(4). The
emergency order entered by the Court at the request of the SEC froze the
settlement funds, preserving the money for the defrauded investors.
For more cutting edge commentary on
developing securities issues, visit SEC Actions, a
blog by Thomas Gorman.
For more information about LexisNexis
products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site.