Tax Law

Tax Reform Fantasy

The most difficult thing to understand about the President's deficit reduction commission is its love affair with tax reform. Under one proposal it would cut $1.1 trillion in tax expenditures, but only $80 billion of that would be for deficit reduction. So, less than 10 percent of the revenue for base broadening would be used to achieve the goal which is the sole purpose of its existence. Of course, you will not find bigger supporters of broadening the base and lowering the rates than the folks I work with at Tax Analysts. We welcome the effort. But, really, what does tax reform have to do with deficit reduction?

. . . .

There are a few half-baked theories about why tax reform and deficit reduction should be joined. According to one view, often voiced by Senator Weyden in support of his tax reform plan, we should strengthen the tax system to improve economic growth, and economic growth in turn will reduce the pain of deficit reduction. Another argument is that by adding tax reform to deficit reduction, politicians have more bargaining chips to make deals, and ultimately on the table tax reform can sweeten the bitter pill of deficit reduction. Yet another is simpler still: while we are doing a major overhaul of our finances we might as well get cracking on revenue reform. It like’s your mechanic saying, while we are overhauling your engine, we might as well go ahead and replace your transmission.

Properly marketed, each of these approaches might have some ephemeral appeal. But the arguments are paper thin and wholesale clean up of our fiscal mess is going to be a long and drawn out process.. . . .

View TaxAnalysts' Martin A. Sullivan's opinion in its entirety on TAX.com.

Discover the features and benefits of LexisNexis® Tax Center

For quality Tax & Accounting research resources, visit the LexisNexis® Store