LexisNexis® CLE On-Demand features premium content from partners like American Law Institute Continuing Legal Education and Pozner & Dodd. Choose from a broad listing of topics suited for law firms, corporate legal departments, and government entities. Individual courses and subscriptions available.
The Supreme Court, for the first time since the Federal Circuit's decision in State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Fin. Group Inc., 149 F.3d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 1998), addressed the proper standard for determining whether a claimed process is patentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101. At issue was whether a process must be (1) tied to a particular machine or apparatus or (2) transform a particular article into a different state or thing to be patent eligible (the "Machine-or-Transformation Test"). The decision's impact on the patentability of tax strategies is yet to be determined.
LEXIS.com users can view the enhanced version of Bilski v. Kappos, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 5521 (U.S. June 28, 2010).
You can also use the lexisONE Free Case Law Search to view the free, unenhanced version of Bilski v. Kappos, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 5521 (U.S. June 28, 2010)
An August 25th teleconference on the future of tax strategy patents after the Supreme Court decision in a business method patent case offered little hope of quick action, either by Congress or the judiciary. The teleconference was sponsored by the American Bar Association Section of Taxation.
For details, see the TaxAnalysts® news story on LexisNexis® Tax Center
"tax strategy patents ". First time to hear this... Glad it exists