LexisNexis® CLE On-Demand features premium content from partners like American Law Institute Continuing Legal Education and Pozner & Dodd. Choose from a broad listing of topics suited for law firms, corporate legal departments, and government entities. Individual courses and subscriptions available.
In their motions for partial summary judgment, the parties asked the court to decide whether taxpayers made a valid joint election under IRC Section 338(h)(10) with respect to acquisition of all of the outstanding common stock of a grocery store chain. The critical issue was whether the transaction constituted a reorganization under IRC Section 368(a)(1)(B), (C), or (G).
Resolution of that issue depended on whether the transaction satisfied the continuity-of-interest requirement. Based upon the parties' agreed facts, the court rejected the IRS argument that, in determining whether the continuity-of-interest requirement was satisfied in the transaction, the Supreme Court's decision in Alabama Asphaltic required the court to treat as equity owners certain creditors who received 83.75 percent of the outstanding common stock of an insolvent entity. Unlike the situation in Alabama Asphaltic, those creditors did not assume effective command over the insolvent corporation's property. The court therefore held that the continuity-of-interest requirement was not satisfied and the transaction was not a reorganization under IRC Section 368(a)(1)(B), (C), or (G).
LEXIS.com users can view the enhanced version of Ralphs Grocery Co. & Subsidiaries v. Comm'r, T.C. Memo 2011-25 (T.C. 2011)
View free on this site Lexis Federal Tax Analyst Maria Domingo's insights on this key Tax Court decision.
RELATED LINKS: For more information, see:
Discover the features and benefits of LexisNexis® Tax Center
For quality Tax & Accounting research resources, visit the LexisNexis® Store