LexisNexis® CLE On-Demand features premium content from partners like American Law Institute Continuing Legal Education and Pozner & Dodd. Choose from a broad listing of topics suited for law firms, corporate legal departments, and government entities. Individual courses and subscriptions available.
A New York appellate court has affirmed a determination by the state’s Board that a claimant had not violated New York’s workers’ compensation fraud statute, NY CLS Work Comp § 114-a, by engaging, without disclosing that fact to the Board or to the employer, in light errands and other work associated with the renovation of a residential structure that he owned. Claimant admitted to participating in various activities on the property, but testified that all his work was “light” in nature, and that subcontractors and other family members performed the remaining work. The court noted that surveillance videos offered by the employer did not contradict the claimant’s testimony. The court also observed that that claimant still owned the property at the time of the hearing, that his son was living there, that the property was not listed for sale and that claimant had not decided whether he would sell the property. The appellate court concluded that while there was evidence that could support a different conclusion, the Board’s finding that there had been no § 114-a violation was supported by substantial evidence.
Reported by Thomas A. Robinson, J.D.
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance. Bracketed citations link to lexis.com.
See Borgal v. Rochester-Genesee Regional Transp. Auth., 2013 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5193 (July 11, 2013) [2013 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5193 (July 11, 2013)]
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 39.03 [39.03]
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law.
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site