Board Panel Opinion Provides a Succinct Explanation By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board The process for...
CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES Vol. 89, No. 4 April 2024 A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions...
By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Several months ago, an article in LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation...
By William Tappin, Esq., Law Offices of Tappin & Associates, Sierra Madre, CA There has been a lot of confusion with respect to whether ERISA preempts state laws regarding numerous programs, including...
By Thomas A. Robinson, co-author, Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law Editorial Note: All section references below are to Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, unless otherwise indicated...
The estate of a residential treatment counselor at a mental health clinic may not maintain a wrongful death action against two directors of the mental health association that employed the decedent, held the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. The counselor was fatally attacked by one of the facility’s residents. The estate filed suit against the directors and others contending the defendants were liable under common law since the directors voted to adopt and enforce certain workplace policies and client admissions polices, and failed or declined to adopt and enforce safety policies and staffing and training requirements that reasonably would have prevented the attack. The high court held the action was barred by the exclusive remedy provisions of the state workers’ compensation act, that although the directors technically were not the decedent’s employer, they were immune since they could not act individually, and only as part of the board of directors, which governed the employer. The court acknowledged that the term "employer" did not include nonprofit entities, as defined by the Internal Revenue Code, that were exclusively staffed by volunteers. The employer, while a nonprofit entity, was not so exclusively staff.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is a leading commentator and expert on the law of workers’ compensation.
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance. Bracketed citations link to lexis.com.
See Estate of Moulton v. Puopolo, 2014 Mass. LEXIS 129 (Mar. 14, 2014) [2014 Mass. LEXIS 129 (Mar. 14, 2014)]
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 111.02 [111.02]
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law.
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site
_____________________________________________________________________
Price $99*; Books shipping now to customers!
Keep track of how the workers' comp landscape is changing with this 400+ page compendium. Here's what you get:
View the brochure & table of contents.
View sample pages.
Order online or contact Christine Hyatt at ph. 937-247-8166, or Email: Christine.E.Hyatt@lexisnexis.com.
*Price does not include sales tax, shipping or handling. Price subject to change without notice.