By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Just when you thought the right of “due process” was on the brink of destruction, the legislature...
By Hon. Susan V. Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Over the past several decades California has implemented broad legislative...
CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES Vol. 89, No. 9 September 2024 A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions...
By Thomas A. Robinson, co-author, Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law Editorial Note: All section references below are to Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, unless otherwise indicated...
By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board One of the most common reasons evaluating physicians flunk the apportionment validity test is due to their...
By Robin E. Kobayashi, J.D., LexisNexis Legal & Professional Operations
Small businesses employ 56 percent of the U.S. workforce. They get pounded each year with the high costs of doing business, and they often lack the financial resources, staffing, expertise, management buy-in, or motivation to help reduce some of those costs by implementing a worksite wellness program.
Consequently, small businesses should perk up their ears about a hot-off-the-press study in the Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, in which Pinnacol Assurance, a workers’ comp insurer in Colorado, teamed up with 260 small businesses to help them implement worksite wellness programs. This study was unique because a workers’ comp insurer, and not a health insurer, helped small businesses—at no cost—set up a workplace wellness program and provided continuous guidance on design and execution of the program.
What does this study mean for small businesses across the nation? It could mean that an alternative model exists where a “plug-and-play” type of workplace wellness program developed by a workers’ comp insurer could succeed when targeting small businesses.
Definition of Small Business
For the purposes of the study in question a small business had less than 500 employees and no more than $7 million in average annual receipts.
How the Study Was Set Up
The study examined, for a period of five years, Pinnacol Assurance’s “health risk management” (HRM) program, which was offered for free to 55,000 policyholders, 99.6 percent of whom were located in Colorado. The Pinnacol Assurance leadership reasoned that “poor health has a negative effect on workers’ compensation costs” and that “health risk management will become as fundamental to managing risks as safety management is currently.”
The HRM program was voluntary. Pinnacol Assurance and insurance agents actively recruited employers to participate. Employers also self-enrolled. In the end, a total of 260 small businesses enrolled in the HRM program. These businesses came from a range of economic sectors.
Goals of the HRM (Workplace Wellness) Program
The goals of the program aligned with the goals of the small businesses which participated in the program:
1. Improve employees’ healthy behaviors2. Reduce workers’ comp rates and costs3. Enhance work productivity
Key Facts and Findings
The study is a workplace-wellness bonanza of interesting facts and findings that illustrate “opportunities to address important modifiable health risks in the small business workforce”:
· The business size of the 260 employers studied ranged from fewer than 10 employees to more than 250 employees; the majority (53.4%) had fewer than 50 employees· The vast majority (70%) were located in the urban “Front Range” of Colorado· 71% remained in the HRM program after 1 year, with 82% of that number remaining in the program through the end of the second year· Small businesses participating in the program definitely wanted more on-site support for implementing and maintaining the program· 6,507 employees at these 260 small businesses enrolled in the HRM program and completed a baseline questionnaire.
o The mean age was 41.4 (plus or minus 13 years)o 74.3% were marriedo 80.6% were whiteo 55.7% were maleo 86.2% were full-time employeeso 41.7% had completed a 4-year college degreeo 75.3% had some education beyond high schoolo 24.9% had an annual income of less than $25,000o 65.8% had an annual income of less than $50,000o The average “overall wellness score” (OWS) was 66.7, plus or minus 13.3, falling into the “doing well” category (60 to 79 score)o 38.9% were normal weight, 34.3% were overweight, 25.6% were obeseo Less than 17% smoked cigaretteso No data was available for marijuana or illicit drugso 81.7% of females consumed 7 or fewer servings of alcohol per weeko More than 98% of males consumed 14 or fewer servings of alcohol per weeko 62% exercised at least 3 times per weeko 82.1% ate at least 3 servings of fruit or vegetables dailyo 53.7% reported 7 or more hours of sleep each dayo 71.5% reported moderate or high stress in their work, home life, or financeso Common health conditions and risk factors reported by employees were overweight (37.8%), seasonal allergies (34.8%), depression (22%), chronic fatigue (20.4%), chronic sleeping problems (18.4%), headaches (17.2%), arthritis (16.3%), high cholesterol (15.7%), hypertension (15.3%)o Chronic and long-term health conditions included: diabetes (3.8%); cancer (3.3%); osteoporosis (2.9%); coronary heart disease (1.7%); chronic lung disease (0.7%)
Limitations of Study
The study attempted to answer the question of whether it was feasible to target small businesses to offer a workplace wellness program to its employees. It was beyond the scope of the study to determine whether health risk reductions would reduce workers’ comp claims and costs.
In addition, the authors of the study were unable to determine the rate of small business adoption.
The study didn’t undertake to examine the factors affecting employee participation. Nor did the study know which incentives each of the small businesses used to encourage employee participation. So the study wasn’t able to pinpoint any “healthy worker bias” among the participating employees. Given the possibility of a healthy worker bias in those employees participating in the program, it raises the question of just how bad the health risks and chronic illnesses could be for the entire population of employees working for small businesses.
Still…A Big First Step
This initial study shows that the barriers for small businesses to implement a workplace wellness program can be overcome. As the authors of this study point out, we need further studies that show exactly how a workplace wellness program can address health risks in employees, workers’ compensation costs, and employee loss of productivity due to illness or injury.
© Copyright 2015 LexisNexis. All rights reserved.
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions, connect with us through our corporate site