LexisNexis® CLE On-Demand features premium content from partners like American Law Institute Continuing Legal Education and Pozner & Dodd. Choose from a broad listing of topics suited for law firms, corporate legal departments, and government entities. Individual courses and subscriptions available.
In what appears to be a case of first impression, an Appeals Board panel held in Kos v. Kimes-Morris Construction that Calif. Labor Code § 4663 does not discriminate against age by apportioning to age related pathology. The WCAB held that substantial evidence supported apportionment of 90-percent of the applicant's total permanent disability to non-industrial degenerative disc disease and 10-percent to her 3/18/2002 industrial injury under Calif. Labor Code § 4663, and that even if § 4663, to the extent it allows apportionment to age-related degenerative disc disease, violates FEHA's prohibition against age discrimination in employment (see Calif. Government Code § 12940(a)) and violates Calif. Government Code § 11135, the WCAB must construe Calif. Labor Code § 4663 to effectuate the legislative intent behind the statute that apportionment to causation may be based on age-related degenerative conditions, and must adhere to the later and more specific enactment of Calif. Labor Code § 4663 apportionment statute over earlier more general age discrimination provisions.
LexisNexis reports hundreds of noteworthy panel decisions in the CA - Noteworthy WCAB Panel Decisions database, which is updated each month.
If you would like a copy of the Kos decision, simply logon and post a comment to this blog with your request. You must be registered first in order to post a comment. Registration is FREE. If you have any problems registering or posting a comment, please contact the site coordinator at Robin.E.Kobayashi@lexisnexis.com.
Please send me a copy of the Kos decision. My email address is included in my registration profile. Thanks
Thank you for your inquiry. I''ve emailed you the requested panel decision.
Please send me a copy of the Kos decision. Thank you.