Workers' Compensation

Recent Posts

Independent Medical Review: A New Wave of Litigation in California
Posted on 16 Jun 2014 by Robert G. Rassp, Esq.

Recent noteworthy panel decisions show that the applicant would be wise to present all relevant medical reports and records, and citations to the MTUS, ACOEM, ODG, or other nationally accepted medical standards to the IMR reviewer, and that when a material... Read More

California: A Post-Dubon II Game Changer?
Posted on 7 Feb 2015 by Robert G. Rassp, Esq.

An interesting argument has been raised: Should an applicant be allowed to rebut the MTUS guidelines before the WCAB? In McFarland v. The Permanente Medical Group, Inc., 2015 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS --, a split WCAB panel, affirming the WCJ, held... Read More

California: WCAB Says MPN Treatment Requests Are Subject to UR/IMR
Posted on 19 Sep 2014 by Calif. WCAB Noteworthy Panel Decisions Reporter

Legislature did not demonstrate an intent to preclude employers from seeking UR of MPN physicians’ requests for authorization of medical treatment In Stock v. Camarillo State Hospital , 2014 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS --, a WCAB panel held that... Read More

California: Opioid Medications in the Treatment of Work-Related Injuries
Posted on 1 Oct 2014 by Calif. WCAB Noteworthy Panel Decisions Reporter

According to the Department of Industrial Relations Director Christine Baker, “ opioid misuse is a national concern ”. As a result of this “misuse”, the Division of Workers’ Compensation recently posted proposed “ Guidelines... Read More

WCAB Panel Finds UR IMR Physician Need Not Be Licensed in California
Posted on 23 Jun 2016 by Brad Wixen

The recent noteworthy panel decision of Navroth v. Mervyn’s Stores , 2016 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS --, is just fascinating for so many reasons beyond the content of the finding itself. How often does a pro per applicant make important case law... Read More

Challenging the Legality of an IMR Decision: The Final Chapter in Stevens
Posted on 2 Jun 2017 by LexisNexis Workers' Comp Law Newsroom Staff

Does the WCAB’s interpretation of the Court of Appeal's language open up the possibility of successful appeals of IMR decisions in the future? In Stevens v. Outspoken Enterprises, Inc. , 2017 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS --, the WCAB, on remittitur... Read More

Here’s Why You Shouldn’t Miss the WCRI 32nd Annual Conference
Posted on 26 Feb 2016 by LexisNexis Workers' Comp Law Newsroom Staff

Anyone familiar with the Workers Compensation Research Institute’s 32-year history of providing the data and analysis that industry mavericks rely upon to understand, manage and effect real change have come to expect WCRI conferences to provide... Read More

California: Utilization Review and Independent Medical Review Best Practices
Posted on 4 Mar 2015 by Karen C. Yotis

Loosening the rope on the UR/IMR Gordian Knot Karen C. Yotis, Esq., Feature Resident Columnist of the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter , provides insights into workplace issues and the nuts and bolts of the workers' comp world... Read More

California: When Utilization Review Determination Untimely, No Portion of UR Determination Could Be Relied on to Deny Medical Treatment
Posted on 17 Oct 2014 by Calif. WCAB Noteworthy Panel Decisions Reporter

WCAB panel issues a new post-Dubon II decision In Korn v. Entertainment Partners , 2014 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS --, a WCAB panel affirmed a WCJ’s finding that an applicant, who was employed as a craft services person, suffered an industrial... Read More

California: Untimely Independent Medical Review
Posted on 13 Jun 2015 by Calif. WCAB Noteworthy Panel Decisions Reporter

Split WCAB panel finds untimely IMR, like untimely UR, is invalid In Saunders v. Loma Linda University Medical Group , 2015 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS --, the WCAB, in a split panel opinion, rescinded its prior decision [see Saunders v. Loma Linda... Read More

California: The MTUS and Treating Physician Reports
Posted on 25 Feb 2016 by Calif. WCAB Noteworthy Panel Decisions Reporter

Does Labor Code § 4604.5(a) specifically require the treating physician’s report to cite the applicable Medical Treatment Utilization Schedule provisions? In Sandoval v. San Diego Unified School District , 2016 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS... Read More

California: Untimely Independent Medical Review – Southard Decision
Posted on 2 Jul 2015 by Calif. WCAB Noteworthy Panel Decisions Reporter

This case is very similar to the Saunders noteworthy panel decision . In Southard v. Hallmark Greeting Cards , 2015 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS --, the WCAB, in a split panel opinion, rescinded the WCJ’s finding that an employee may appeal an... Read More