Most firms can show that every new client was screened before the account opened. Fewer can show when an existing client was last screened, against which version of the UK sanctions list, and who cleared...
There is a difference between running checks and completing a verification. Most programmes do the former: an identity check here, a sanctions screen there, an ownership search when someone asks. Fewer...
Two AML compliance APIs can be sent the same entity, on the same day, with the same matching logic, and return different answers. The difference is rarely in the endpoint. It sits in the source set each...
Typing a name into a search engine and finding nothing alarming is not a due diligence check. It is the absence of a result, which is a different thing entirely. A clean first page reflects what a public...
Customer due diligence works only when the depth of effort is proportional to the risk in front of the analyst, but in practice many programmes drift toward a single uniform process because tiering rules...
Avoiding a breach of Anti-Money Laundering (AML) regulations–and the fine that follows–should be a priority for any company in 2023. The financial costs of a compliance failure is increasing, with global fines against companies rising by 50% year-on-year. In the latest blog in our AML series, we look some recent global fines for alleged money laundering failures. We then highlight four ways for firms can avoid a compliance breach and a fine–and how Nexis® Solutions can help to improve their AML process every step of the way.
The total fines paid by companies to settle alleged money laundering and other financial crime breaches rose dramatically by 50% in 2022, according to Fenergo. A striking feature of recent money laundering fines is that they have been truly global, following investigations by enforcement agencies across the world. For example:
These heavy fines reflect the growing financial and legal risk to companies if they fail to put in place adequate AML procedures, including an effective risk-based due diligence programme. The cases above also inflicted strategic costs on companies as they diverted senior management’s time and effort into responding to the allegations and remediating any breaches. Moreover, it caused reputational damage as the fines made headlines around the world.
Our recent AML series has been exploring how companies can improve their ability to detect suspected money laundering and act to mitigate those risks. Four of the most important tools that companies need for this are:
Nexis Solutions combines comprehensive data and the latest technologies to support companies with each of the four tools outlined in the paragraph above. This includes:
The global economic downturn has prompted many companies to seek to cut their overheads and costs. But if companies reduce their compliance budgets, they increase their risk of fines and legal action as well as reputational and strategic risks of a money laundering regulatory breach.
Investing in AML and due diligence can help companies to avoid costly fines. It can also offer a return on investment because surveys suggest that more and more consumers, investors and employees want to buy from, invest in and work for companies that are committed to ethical business practices. Moreover, technology platforms like Nexis Diligence+ can actually help firms to reduce their expenditure on time-consuming manual due diligence searches and free up compliance officers to perform higher value work.
Looking for more tips on how to implement an effective due diligence operation to identify and manage money laundering risks? Our White Paper, ‘AML Compliance: A Global View’, identifies the main trends companies need to respond to. Download it for free today.
Email: middleeast@lexisnexis.com
Telephone: +971 (0) 4 560 1200