This year’s Kroll Fraud and Financial Crime Report found companies are growing increasingly concerned that third parties are driving a higher risk of financial crime. We read through the report to pull...
Millions of companies around the world have been impacted by regulations which mandate them to carry out ESG and human rights due diligence (HRDD in the last few years–or they soon will be. These regulations...
From Stricter Sanctions to Broken Supply Chains: What the Ukrainian War has Meant for Third Party Risk Management February 2024 will mark two years since the latest conflict in Ukraine began. As well...
Third parties help companies to deliver their products and services, but they also expose them to regulatory, financial, strategic and reputational risks. In the latest blog in our third party risk series...
Financial crimes such as bribery, corruption and money laundering are becoming more common and more complex. One of the most common reasons for a company becoming implicated in alleged financial crime...
Anti-Money Laundering regulations have changed rapidly in recent years–from Switzerland to Singapore, from Brazil to Bahrain. Building on our whitepaper, ‘AML Compliance: A Global View’, we identify and summarise four major developments which are driving regulatory changes across the world. This blog summarises those changes in order to help companies to prepare for future regulatory interventions.
1. AML regulations are not standing still
Laws and regulations often change very gradually over decades, but this has certainly not been the case for the Anti-Money Laundering requirements imposed on global businesses. New regulations seem to be being proposed all the time–just last month, for example, Switzerland’s government announced draft regulations to improve beneficial ownership transparency and improve its enforcement of sanctions breaches.
Further regulatory change is expected in the coming months and years. The European Union has been particularly busy in updating its AML regime with a suite of Directives in the last five years, and a further package of measures was approved by the European Parliament in March 2023. Soon, EU member states will once again need to update their own regulations to ensure they remain compliant.
2. Regulations are sharpening the teeth of enforcement agencies
A common criticism of some countries’ regulatory frameworks is that, while the regime appears robust on paper, it has not been backed up by successful enforcement actions against companies. As a result, recent regulatory reforms have specifically targeted obstacles to improving regulators’ enforcement records. Some of the new regulations have been driven by comments in an evaluation by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), which often makes recommendations for how countries can improve their AML enforcement.
For example, France introduced an Action Plan against Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing in 2021 which included giving more powers to its Financial Investigation Unit to intercept money flows when they have suspicions about a transaction. Since then, FATF has praised France for its “very good results” of a 93% conviction rate for prosecutions of alleged terrorist financing.
Likewise, the emergence of a long backlog of suspicious activity reports needing to be investigated led to the resignation of the head of Germany’s AML authority in 2022. The Finance Ministry created a new agency in the same year with investigative powers that are aimed at improving the country’s record on AML enforcement.
This has been borne out by an increase in the total fines flowing from global enforcements against companies for involvement in alleged money laundering and terrorist financing. Banks and other financial institutions were fined nearly $5 billion for AML and other financial crime breaches in 2022, according to Fenergo. This represented a 50% increase on 2021. The impact on companies is that the regulatory and financial risks of a compliance breach are only increasing.
3. AML is becoming a truly global priority
Historically, the United States government’s regulations against bribery, corruption and money laundering held the most influence around the world, and companies were more likely to face enforcement action by the US for their global activities, rather than by their home country’s regulator. This is no longer the case, and the last five years have seen major regulatory reforms in regions which traditionally had a weaker reputation for AML regulation and enforcement. This includes:
4. Technology is likely to be the next regulatory requirement
Recent announcements from various national regulators hint at technology becoming a core part of their expectations for how global companies approach AML compliance and due diligence. This has not escaped global businesses’ attention, and in Kroll’s 2023 Fraud and Financial Crime Survey most executives surveyed predicted regulators will look more closely at how they use technology for AML compliance in 2023-24.
Recent examples of regulatory involvement in technology include:
The regulators’ next step is expected to be imposing new requirements for companies to use sophisticated technological tools themselves to monitor for potential money laundering and terrorist financing activity. As a result, companies are investing in technology that can help them to identify suspected money laundering risks from large, authoritative and up-to-date datasets, and even automate parts of the due diligence process.
However, this is not simply about mitigating risk, but firms have found that technology brings opportunities for them to rely less on resource-intensive manual searches, and instead make risk-based decisions more quickly, accurately and cost-effectively than ever before.
Email: middleeast@lexisnexis.com
Telephone: +971 (0) 4 560 1200