As AI becomes more common in legal practice, many professionals are discovering an unexpected challenge: their tools don’t always work together. A typical day for an Australian lawyer might involve switching...
Kiren Chitkara , Legal Writer, Practical Guidance Succession Chloe Silvester , Head of General Practice, Practical Guidance November 2025 marks one of the most significant transformations in Australia...
For decades, LexisNexis ® has defined legal research. But research is just the beginning. Today, we’re transforming the entire legal workflow, evolving from a research provider into a technology partner...
Authored by Seeta Bodke, Head of Product - Pacific, LexisNexis® Legal & Professional We all know the stories: briefs cited fake cases. Submissions with phantom judgments. Entire arguments are built on...
Capital Monitor™ Editorial by Keely Garcia A single week in November 2023 saw four women lose their lives in South Australia amid domestic and family violence, an alarming record across any Australian...
Should Australian organisations, even those that don’t have a Chinese market for their products or services, care about China’s new privacy law?
On 1 November 2021, China’s Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) commenced in the People’s Republic of China. The PIPL establishes a framework for collection, storage and disclosure of personal information.
This wide-reaching jurisdictional approach of the PIPL is similar to the extraterritorial operation of Article 3 of the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
[FREE DOWNLOAD] PIPL Applicability Assessment Questionnaire
You may not expect that legislation passed in the People’s Republic of China could potentially impact Australian organisations that have little connection to mainland China. But the PIPL, with its significantly wide jurisdictional reach, does exactly that.
It applies not only to organisations that handle personal information within China (such as to global multinationals with local Chinese operations), but also to organisations that handle personal information outside of China, if the personal information they handle relates to any individual inside China.
Australian organisations that are domiciled outside of China, may (sometimes unexpectedly) find themselves subject to the PIPL, if, for example,
Handling of personal information under the PIPL is broadly defined and includes collecting, storing, using, processing, transmitting, providing, disclosing and deleting personal information, through any means - whether online or through traditional methods such as hard copy.
In this way, the PIPL applies broadly to most activities involving personal data.
Organisations that collect employment data (such as their Chinese employees’ residential addresses), or the vaccination status of Chinese base staff or customers, the resumes of potential Chinese based employees or who collect and analyse deanonymized “click data” of Chinese customers would all be “handling” the personal information of persons in China.
The PIPL contains eight chapters and 74 articles regulating how organisations handle personal information including:
Penalties for non-compliance with the PIPL may be severe, with fines up to 5% of the organisation’s revenue for the prior year or up to RMB 50 million (around $10 million AUD) and suspension or termination of the organisation’s license to operate in China.
In light of these penalties, Australian organisations that handle the personal information of individuals who may reside in China or in connection with individuals that may reside in China, should urgently undertake a review and assessment of their data handling activities to ensure they understand if thePIPL is applicable to them and, if so, to ensure compliance with the PIPL.
Organisations may need to amend their existing privacy and data handling policies, controls and processes or reconsider how and where they handle personal information to ensure compliance under the PIPL.
Whilst there are many similarities between the PIPL and the GDPR, the schemes are not identical. Organisations that currently comply with GDPR requirements, that will now also be subject to the PIPL, should undertake an analysis of the gap between the PIPL and GDPR to ensure compliance with both schemes.
Organisations may benefit from appointing a representative in China, or locally, to deal with PIPL matters and to liaise, as needed, with Chinese regulators including the CAC.
![]() |
Alison Cripps is the LexisNexis Legal Writer for Practical Guidance – Cybersecurity, Data Protection and Privacy. LexisNexis Practical Guidance for Cybersecurity, Data Protection and Privacy provides extensive practical guidance on China’s Personal Information Protection Law, including English translations of the PIPL and other applicable Chinese legislation and a PIPL Applicability Assessment Questionnaire to assist with determining if the PIPL applies to your organisation. |
Practical Guidance gives you the practically-focused online content you need to conduct a new legal matter. Discover expert guidance, repeatable documents, forms, precedents, checklists and an extensive range of specialised toolkits, designed for today's lawyers and the flexible way you work.
To stay across further developments in this space, register for Practical Guidance Fortnightly Roundups.