The Malayan Law Journal Alerts is a complimentary blog series that brings the most recently published case reports powered by Lexis+ ® Malaysia . Quote of the Month [36] In judicial review...
The Malayan Law Journal Alerts is a complimentary blog series that brings the most recently published case reports powered by Lexis+ ® Malaysia . Quote of the Month [36] In judicial review...
The Malayan Law Journal Alerts is a complimentary blog series that brings the most recently published case reports powered by Lexis+ ® Malaysia . Quote of the Month “[125] Good faith is a general...
The Malayan Law Journal Alerts is a complimentary blog series that brings the most recently published case reports powered by Lexis+ ® Malaysia . Quote of the Month “[125] Good faith is a general...
The Malayan Law Journal Alerts is a complimentary blog series that brings the most recently published case reports powered by Lexis+ ® Malaysia . Quote of the Month ‘ [136] The doctrine of...
The Malayan Law Journal Alerts is a complimentary blog series that brings the most recently published case reports powered by Lexis+® Malaysia.
Quote of the Month
[36] In judicial review applications, as opposed to other interlocutory applications, the distinguishing factor is that the affidavit verifying facts is the same affidavit used for the substantive application. Thus, according to Tuan Hj Sarip Hamid & Anor v Patco Malaysia Bhd [1995] 2 MLJ 442, while the leave application for review is interlocutory in character, the affidavit may require direct knowledge depending on the nature of the subject matter. In this case, in view of the nature of the subject matter, the addendum order, or its existence thereof, I hold that no weight is attached to the same in determining whether leave ought to be granted or otherwise. - AMARJEET SINGH J Dato’ Sri Mohd Najib bin Tun Hj Abd Razak v Menteri Dalam Negeri & Ors [2025] 9 MLJ 611 [HC] |
Week 1 Updates
Coram | ELAINE YAP JC |
Catchwords | Arbitration — Stay of proceedings — Application |
Outcome | Enclosure 56 dismissed. |
Counsel Names |
|
2. Hasina bt Meera Maidin v Tetuan Rajinder & Goh (sued as a firm) & Ors [2025] 9 MLJ 236 [HC]
Coram | ARZIAH MOHAMED APANDI JC |
Catchwords | Contract — Agreement — Agreement to share legal fees of successful litigation |
Outcome | Order accordingly. |
Counsel Names |
|
3. Generali Insurance Malaysia Bhd & Anor v Dura Guard Force & Consultancy Sdn Bhd [2025] 9 MLJ 220 [HC]
Coram | GAN TECHIONG JC |
Catchwords | Civil Procedure — Locus standi — Action by insurer |
Outcome | Defendant’s application to strike out first plaintiff’s action allowed with costs; second plaintiff’s claim shall proceed to trial. |
Counsel Names |
|
Coram | AHMAD KAMAL J |
Catchwords | Labour Law — Wages — Restructuring of wages |
Outcome | Appeal allowed. |
Counsel Names |
|
Week 2 Updates
1. Pop Investments Ltd v iCapital.Biz Bhd [2025] 9 MLJ 331 [HC]
Coram | ATAN MUSTAFFA J |
Catchwords | Civil Procedure — Locus standi — Action by beneficial owner of shares |
Outcome | Enclosure 1 dismissed with costs of RM25,000 to be paid by Pop to ICAP; encl 17 dismissed with no order as to costs. |
Counsel Names |
|
2. Sharil @ Shahrir bin Ab Samad v Tommy Thomas @ Mohan a/l K Thomas & Ors [2025] 9 MLJ 316 [HC]
Coram | ROZ MAWAR JC |
Catchwords | Civil Procedure — Striking out — Application for |
Outcome | First defendant’s application dismissed. |
Counsel Names |
|
3. Toso Co Ltd v Goodmeyer Curtain Accessories Supply Sdn Bhd [2025] 9 MLJ 379 [HC]
Coram | YUSRIN FAIDZ JC |
Catchwords | Civil Procedure — Orders — Protective and sealing order |
Outcome | Plaintiff’s application for protective order allowed as per encl 161 with costs in the cause. |
Counsel Names |
|
4. Pendakwa Raya lwn Hafifah Hanisah bt Ishak dan lain-lain [2025] 9 MLJ 361 [HC]
Coram | ABU BAKAR KATAR H |
Catchwords | Prosedur Jenayah — Bidang kuasa mahkamah — Mahkamah majistret |
Outcome | Perintah majistret diakaskan. |
Counsel Names |
|
Week 3 Updates
1. Re: Lau Kah Hing; ex parte: Institut Memandu Maju Jaya Sdn Bhd (in liquidation) [2025] 9 MLJ 466 [HC]
Coram | WONG SIONG TUNG J |
Catchwords | Bankruptcy — Act of bankruptcy — Deferment of act of bankruptcy |
Outcome | Enclosure 117 allowed with cost of RM3,000; encl 126 dismissed with costs of RM3,000. |
Counsel Names |
|
2. Export-Import Bank of Malaysia Bhd v Impiana Seminyak (Labuan) Co Ltd & Anor [2025] 9 MLJ 487 [HC]
Coram | YUSRIN FAIDZ JC |
Catchwords | Banking — Banks and banking business — Islamic financing facility |
Outcome | Claim allowed. |
Counsel Names |
|
3. Lee Ngan Hoo v Insp Sarawanan a/l Panrengam & Ors [2025] 9 MLJ 509 [HC]
Coram | LEONG WAI HONG JC |
Catchwords | Civil Procedure — Discontinuance — Leave to discontinue suit with liberty to file afresh |
Outcome | Enclosure 117 allowed with cost of RM3,000; encl 126 dismissed with costs of RM3,000. |
Counsel Names |
|
4. Irene Wong Sook Lin & Ors v Datuk Au Yee Boon & Ors [2025] 9 MLJ 436 [HC]
Coram | LEONG WAI HONG J |
Catchwords | Companies and Corporations — Derivative action — Suit against directors |
Outcome | Leave application dismissed. |
Counsel Names |
|
5. Tom Eastwind 365 Sdn Bhd v Pemunya-Pemunya Kapal Atau Vesel Icon Sophia [2025] 9 MLJ 397 [HC]
Coram | ONG CHEE KWAN J |
Catchwords | Tort — Negligence — Maritime negligence |
Outcome | Order accordingly. |
Counsel Names |
|
Week 4 Updates
Coram | ATAN MUSTAFFA J |
Catchwords | Contract — Guarantee — Release of guarantor |
Outcome | D1/D2’s applications allowed; plaintiff’s claim struck out. |
Counsel Names |
|
2. Govindaraju a/l Kuppusamy v Tan Sri Dato' Seri Dr Mahadevan a/l Mahalingam & Anor [2025] 9 MLJ 546 [HC]
Coram | AMARJEET SINGH J |
Catchwords | Legal Profession — Disciplinary proceedings — Disciplinary Board/Committee |
Outcome | Appellant’s appeal dismissed. |
Counsel Names |
|
3. Konsesi Kotapermatamas Sdn Bhd v Tegas Broadcast & Multimedia Sdn Bhd & Anor [2025] 9 MLJ 564 [HC]
Coram | ONG CHEE KWAN J |
Catchwords | Contract — Claims — Claim for work done |
Outcome | Appeal allowed with costs. |
Counsel Names |
|
4. Reflex Media, Inc & Anor v Endeavor Standard Sdn Bhd & Anor [2025] 9 MLJ 582 [HC]
Coram | ADLIN ABDUL MAJID J |
Catchwords | Civil Procedure — Execution/enforcement of foreign judgment — Whether Malaysian defendant had carried on business in United States of America (‘US’) so as to give US court jurisdiction over it |
Outcome | Plaintiffs’ claim to enforce the US judgment against the defendants allowed. |
Counsel Names |
|
5. Dato’ Sri Mohd Najib bin Tun Hj Abd Razak v Menteri Dalam Negeri & Ors [2025] 9 MLJ 611 [HC]
Coram | AMARJEET SINGH J |
Catchwords | Administrative Law — Judicial review — Application for leave |
Outcome | Application dismissed. |
Counsel Names |
|
Don't want to miss out on the latest updates? If you have not subscribed to the MLJ Alerts newsletter, subscribe today so you will be notified on the most recently published case reports.
Email: mylexisnexis@lexisnexis.com
Phone: 1800 88 8856