Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.
Latest Blogs
MLJ Alerts: Oct 2025 (Appellate Court)

The Malayan Law Journal Alerts is a complimentary blog series that brings the most recently published case reports powered by Lexis+ ® Malaysia . Week 1 Updates 1. Kong Kin Lay & Ors v Kong Kin Siong...

MLJ Alerts: Oct 2025 (High Court)

The Malayan Law Journal Alerts is a complimentary blog series that brings the most recently published case reports powered by Lexis+ ® Malaysia . Week 1 Updates 1. Re Far Origin Sdn Bhd (in liquidation...

MLJ Alerts: Sept 2025 (Appellate Court)

The Malayan Law Journal Alerts is a complimentary blog series that brings the most recently published case reports powered by Lexis+ ® Malaysia . Quote of the Month "[106] This case is a timely...

MLJ Alerts: Sept 2025 (High Court)

The Malayan Law Journal Alerts is a complimentary blog series that brings the most recently published case reports powered by Lexis+ ® Malaysia . Week 1 Updates 1. Tanjung Rhu Land Sdn Bhd & Anor v...

MLJ Alerts: Aug 2025 (Appellate Court)

The Malayan Law Journal Alerts is a complimentary blog series that brings the most recently published case reports powered by Lexis+ ® Malaysia . Quote of the Month “[59] We always remind ourselves...

MLJ Alerts: Oct 2025 (Appellate Court)

The Malayan Law Journal Alerts is a complimentary blog series that brings the most recently published case reports powered by Lexis+® Malaysia.

Week 1 Updates

1. Kong Kin Lay & Ors v Kong Kin Siong & Ors [2025] 5 MLJ 891 [CA]

Coram SUPANG LIAN, AZIMAH OMAR AND WONG KIAN KHEONG JJCA
Catchwords Evidence — Adverse inference — Failure to adduce certain evidence
Outcome Appeal allowed; High Court’s decision set aside with costs of RM180,000 to be paid by respondents to first to sixth appellants, subject to allocatur fee.
Counsel Names

  • Manjit Kaur Gill (with Keeshantini a/p Baskeran and Lavinderdeep Singh) (Manjit Lavinder & Co) for the appellants.

  • Chok Zhin Theng (with Michelle Chin Zi Shan) (Cheah Teh Su) for the respondents.

2. The Attorney General of Malaysia v Dato’ Sri Mohd Najib bin Tun Hj Abdul Razak and another appeal [2025] 5 MLJ 944 [FC]

Coram HASNAH HASHIM CJ (MALAYA), ZABARIAH YUSOF AND HANIPAH FARIKULLAH FCJJ
Catchwords Evidence — Fresh or further evidence — On appeal
Outcome Appeals dismissed; COA’s decision affirmed except in respect of encl 50 which was partly allowed.
Counsel Names

  • Tan Sri Dato’ Mohd Dusuki bin Mokhtar (with Shamsul bin Bolhassan, Ahmad Hanir bin Hambaly @ Arwi, Nurhafizza bt Azizan, Safiyyah bt Omar, Ainna Sherina bt Saipolamin and Siti Nurfarhana Muhammad Azmi) (Attorney General’s Chambers) for the appellant.

  • Tan Sri Dr Muhammad Shafee bin Abdullah (with Muhammad Farhan bin Muhammad Shafee, Wan Muhammad Arfan bin Wan Othman, Nur Syafiqah bt Mohd Sofian, Naresh a/l Mayachandran, Tharrence Anthony (Pupil-in-Chambers) and Mohd Hafeez bin Rahim (Pupil-in-Chambers)) (Shafee & Co) for the respondent.

Don't want to miss out on the latest updates? If you have not subscribed to the MLJ Alerts newsletter, subscribe today so you will be notified on the most recently published case reports.

Get in touch

Email: mylexisnexis@lexisnexis.com
Phone: 1800 88 8856

All fields are required unless otherwise noted.