<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/atom.xsl" media="screen"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-US"><title type="html">Commercial Law </title><subtitle type="html" /><id>https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/nz/b/commercial-law/atom</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/nz/b/commercial-law" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/nz/b/commercial-law/atom" /><generator uri="http://telligent.com" version="12.1.1.20482">Telligent Community (Build: 12.1.1.20482)</generator><updated>2024-10-10T13:04:19Z</updated><entry><title>Headnote: Commerce Commission v Canterbury Industrial Scrubbing Ltd</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/nz/b/commercial-law/posts/headnote-commerce-commission-v-canterbury-industrial-scrubbing-ltd" /><id>https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/nz/b/commercial-law/posts/headnote-commerce-commission-v-canterbury-industrial-scrubbing-ltd</id><published>2024-10-10T20:04:19Z</published><updated>2024-10-10T20:04:19Z</updated><content type="html">The Commerce Commission, sued the defendants, Canterbury Industrial Scrubbing Ltd (Scrubbing), alleging that they had engaged in cartel conduct. Read more!(&lt;a href="https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/nz/b/commercial-law/posts/headnote-commerce-commission-v-canterbury-industrial-scrubbing-ltd"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/aggbug?PostID=1855&amp;AppID=132&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Candy Vongpraseuth</name><uri>https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/blogs/members/candy-vongpraseuth</uri></author></entry></feed>