<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Family Law</title><link>https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/nz/b/family-law</link><description /><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>Children’s voices in the family justice system — hearing children’s views before making life-changing decisions for them</title><link>https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/nz/b/family-law/posts/childrens-voices-in-the-family-justice-system</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 21:56:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">70e9d49d-698d-4e02-a4a2-27e38d3f49b5:90bee454-b920-4349-a42c-617d4fd63dc4</guid><dc:creator>Macristina Mauricio</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/nz/b/family-law/rsscomments?WeblogPostID=3074</wfw:commentRss><comments>https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/nz/b/family-law/posts/childrens-voices-in-the-family-justice-system#comments</comments><description>Summary

&lt;a href="#mcetoc_1j4tfrtrt0"&gt;Introduction&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href="#mcetoc_1j4tfrtrt1"&gt;Hearing a child&amp;rsquo;s views and allowing them to participate &amp;mdash; what that involves&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href="#mcetoc_1j4tfrtrt2"&gt;Why children&amp;rsquo;s views should be listened to before making care and guardianship decisions for them: Practical life-enhancing reasons&lt;/a&gt;
...(&lt;a href="https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/nz/b/family-law/posts/childrens-voices-in-the-family-justice-system"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/aggbug?PostID=3074&amp;AppID=97&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Valuation of Cryptocurrency in Relationship Property Disputes</title><link>https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/nz/b/family-law/posts/valuation-of-cryptocurrency-in-relationship-property-dispute</link><pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2025 22:19:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">70e9d49d-698d-4e02-a4a2-27e38d3f49b5:76ada248-5f34-4382-ae06-aba2fad45a39</guid><dc:creator>Macristina Mauricio</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/nz/b/family-law/rsscomments?WeblogPostID=3000</wfw:commentRss><comments>https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/nz/b/family-law/posts/valuation-of-cryptocurrency-in-relationship-property-dispute#comments</comments><description>How can volatile cryptocurrencies be fairly valued in property division? This article explores legal challenges and valuation issues. Read the full article now!(&lt;a href="https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/nz/b/family-law/posts/valuation-of-cryptocurrency-in-relationship-property-dispute"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/aggbug?PostID=3000&amp;AppID=97&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>“The balance thing”: Family Court lawyers discuss the ethics of representing parents in Care of Children disputes</title><link>https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/nz/b/family-law/posts/family-court-lawyers-discuss-the-ethics-of-representing-parents-in-care-of-children-disputes</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2024 04:01:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">70e9d49d-698d-4e02-a4a2-27e38d3f49b5:23f48b63-ebdc-49b2-9c8c-81c971791d65</guid><dc:creator>Jessie Pasia</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/nz/b/family-law/rsscomments?WeblogPostID=2136</wfw:commentRss><comments>https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/nz/b/family-law/posts/family-court-lawyers-discuss-the-ethics-of-representing-parents-in-care-of-children-disputes#comments</comments><description>Family Court lawyers discuss the ethics of representing parents in Care of Children disputes.(&lt;a href="https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/nz/b/family-law/posts/family-court-lawyers-discuss-the-ethics-of-representing-parents-in-care-of-children-disputes"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/aggbug?PostID=2136&amp;AppID=97&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Whāngai v adoption: Succession in the Māori Land Court | A complimentary article from the New Zealand Family Law Journal</title><link>https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/nz/b/family-law/posts/whangai-v-adoption-succession-in-the-maori-land-court-a-complimentary-article-from-the-new-zealand-family-law-journal</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2024 15:41:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">70e9d49d-698d-4e02-a4a2-27e38d3f49b5:eaec54f2-c282-4b8a-a81f-d612982014f0</guid><dc:creator>Candy Vongpraseuth</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/nz/b/family-law/rsscomments?WeblogPostID=1840</wfw:commentRss><comments>https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/nz/b/family-law/posts/whangai-v-adoption-succession-in-the-maori-land-court-a-complimentary-article-from-the-new-zealand-family-law-journal#comments</comments><description>The article argues that adopted children shouldn&amp;#39;t automatically inherit Māori land, as it conflicts with Tikanga Māori. Read the full article now!(&lt;a href="https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/nz/b/family-law/posts/whangai-v-adoption-succession-in-the-maori-land-court-a-complimentary-article-from-the-new-zealand-family-law-journal"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/aggbug?PostID=1840&amp;AppID=97&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Falling between two stools? The risk in New Zealand’s approach to the assessment of grave risk in Hague Convention cases</title><link>https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/nz/b/family-law/posts/the-risk-in-new-zealands-approach-to-the-assessment-of-grave-risk-in-hague-convention-cases</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2024 15:35:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">70e9d49d-698d-4e02-a4a2-27e38d3f49b5:bf35047a-9bde-4380-ba6f-6bff23095f5b</guid><dc:creator>Candy Vongpraseuth</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/nz/b/family-law/rsscomments?WeblogPostID=1838</wfw:commentRss><comments>https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/nz/b/family-law/posts/the-risk-in-new-zealands-approach-to-the-assessment-of-grave-risk-in-hague-convention-cases#comments</comments><description>Grave risk defence cases under the Hague Convention require a precautionary approach. Read the full article in LexisNexis New Zealand Blog now!(&lt;a href="https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/nz/b/family-law/posts/the-risk-in-new-zealands-approach-to-the-assessment-of-grave-risk-in-hague-convention-cases"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/aggbug?PostID=1838&amp;AppID=97&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Case note: Possession of home and trusts — Lindsay v Lamb</title><link>https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/nz/b/family-law/posts/case-note-possession-of-home-and-trusts-lindsay-v-lamb</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2024 16:31:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">70e9d49d-698d-4e02-a4a2-27e38d3f49b5:defe2ddc-697d-4840-a8ac-ebd62fea1d4f</guid><dc:creator>Candy Vongpraseuth</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/nz/b/family-law/rsscomments?WeblogPostID=1610</wfw:commentRss><comments>https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/nz/b/family-law/posts/case-note-possession-of-home-and-trusts-lindsay-v-lamb#comments</comments><description>This note discusses obtaining an occupation or tenancy order over a family home in a trust, highlighting Judge Coyle&amp;#39;s decision in Lindsay v Lamb. Read Now!(&lt;a href="https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/nz/b/family-law/posts/case-note-possession-of-home-and-trusts-lindsay-v-lamb"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/aggbug?PostID=1610&amp;AppID=97&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Family law in New Zealand – what’s changing?</title><link>https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/nz/b/family-law/posts/family-law-in-new-zealand-what-s-changing</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 20:11:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">70e9d49d-698d-4e02-a4a2-27e38d3f49b5:5303262c-896d-48aa-bad3-addad8d50cc5</guid><dc:creator>admin</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/nz/b/family-law/rsscomments?WeblogPostID=1385</wfw:commentRss><comments>https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/nz/b/family-law/posts/family-law-in-new-zealand-what-s-changing#comments</comments><description>Two co-authors, Bill Atkin and Mark Henaghan, discussed major changes of Family Law in New Zealand. Read full article in LexisNexis New Zealand Blog now!(&lt;a href="https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/nz/b/family-law/posts/family-law-in-new-zealand-what-s-changing"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/aggbug?PostID=1385&amp;AppID=97&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="https://www.lexisnexis.com/blogs/nz/b/family-law/archive/tags/family%2blaw">family law</category></item></channel></rss>