Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.

Latest Blogs

MLJ Alerts: June 2025 (Appellate Court)

The Malayan Law Journal Alerts is a complimentary blog series that brings the most recently published case reports powered by Lexis+ ® Malaysia . Quote of the Month [36] In judicial review...

MLJ Alerts: June 2025 (High Court)

The Malayan Law Journal Alerts is a complimentary blog series that brings the most recently published case reports powered by Lexis+ ® Malaysia . Quote of the Month [36] In judicial review...

MLJ Alerts: May 2025 (Appellate Court)

The Malayan Law Journal Alerts is a complimentary blog series that brings the most recently published case reports powered by Lexis+ ® Malaysia . Quote of the Month “[125] Good faith is a general...

MLJ Alerts: May 2025 (High Court)

The Malayan Law Journal Alerts is a complimentary blog series that brings the most recently published case reports powered by Lexis+ ® Malaysia . Quote of the Month “[125] Good faith is a general...

MLJ Alerts: Apr 2025 (Appellate Court)

The Malayan Law Journal Alerts is a complimentary blog series that brings the most recently published case reports powered by Lexis+ ® Malaysia . Quote of the Month ‘ [136] The doctrine of...

MLJ Alerts: June 2025 (Appellate Court)

The Malayan Law Journal Alerts is a complimentary blog series that brings the most recently published case reports powered by Lexis+® Malaysia.

Quote of the Month

[36] In judicial review applications, as opposed to other interlocutory applications, the distinguishing factor is that the affidavit verifying facts is the same affidavit used for the substantive application. Thus, according to Tuan Hj Sarip Hamid & Anor v Patco Malaysia Bhd [1995] 2 MLJ 442, while the leave application for review is interlocutory in character, the affidavit may require direct knowledge depending on the nature of the subject matter. In this case, in view of the nature of the subject matter, the addendum order, or its existence thereof, I hold that no weight is attached to the same in determining whether leave ought to be granted or otherwise.

- AMARJEET SINGH J

Dato’ Sri Mohd Najib bin Tun Hj Abd Razak v Menteri Dalam Negeri & Ors [2025] 9 MLJ 611 [HC]

Week 1 Updates

1. Suruhanjaya Persaingan v Myteksi Sdn Bhd & Ors [2025] 3 MLJ 197 [CA]

Coram NANTHA BALAN, LIM CHONG FONG AND AHMAD KAMAL JJCA
Catchwords Administrative Law — Judicial review — Certiorari
Outcome Appeal dismissed; decision of High Court affirmed with costs of RM50,000 to be paid by appellant to respondents subject to allocatur.
Counsel Names

  • Tommy Thomas (Mervyn Lai Wei Shiung, Alicia Gomez and Wong Ting Ying with him) (Tommy Thomas) for the appellant.

  • Malik Imtiaz Sarwar (Lim Yvonne, Shanthi Kandiah, Yo Yi Yun, Azyan bt Mohamed Ibrahim and Chin Yan We with him) (Shanthi Kandiah Chambers) for the respondents.

2. Wawasan Raya (M) Sdn Bhd & Anor v MARC Service Residence Management Corp [2025] 3 MLJ 214 [CA]

Coram SEE MEE CHUN, LIM CHONG FONG AND WONG KIAN KHEONG JJCA
Catchwords Civil Procedure — Injunction — Interlocutory injunction
Outcome Appeal allowed; High Court’s decision set aside.
Counsel Names

  • Chow Li Kian (with Lee Jia Fu and Ho Yong Yi) (Josephine, LK Chow & Co) for the appellant.

  • Shahabudin bin Shaik Alaudin (with Rosnida bt Che Ibrahim, Siti Nurazwani bt Zulkeflee and Nadia bt Ahmad Suhaidin) (Shahabudin & Rozima) for the respondent.

3. Gan Kok Shang & Anor v Public Prosecutor [2025] 3 MLJ 174 [CA]

Coram VAZEER ALAM, AHMAD ZAIDI IBRAHIM AND AZMI ARIFFIN JJCA
Catchwords Criminal Procedure — Transfer of cases — Power of magistrate
Outcome Appeal allowed; High Court’s decision set aside and magistrate’s decision reinstated.
Counsel Names

  • Gobind Singh Deo (with Tiara Katrina Fuad) (Gobind Singh Deo & Co) for the first appellant.

  • Ho Cheng En (with Asyraaf Abu Bakar Hamzah) (TL Chen & Co) for the second appellant.

  • Syarifah Khairiah bt Syed Akmal (Deputy Public Prosecutor, Attorney General's Chambers) for the respondent.

4. The New Straits Times Press (M) Bhd v Aideah Communication Sdn Bhd [2025] 3 MLJ 240 [FC]

Coram ZABARIAH YUSOF, ABDUL KARIM AND AHMAD TERRIRUDIN FCJJ
Catchwords Contract — Terms — Construction of clause
Outcome Appeal dismissed.
Counsel Names

  • Firoz Hussein (Saritha Devi Kirupalani, Choo Shi Jin, Nur Nabila Roslee and Harel Nieryan with him) (Firoz Julian) for appellant.

  • DP Naban (Bahari Yeow Tien Hong, Amina Qistina bt Mohd Idris with him) (Rosli Dahlan Saravana & Partnership) for respondent.

Week 2 Updates

1. UEM Land Bhd v Menteri Kewangan Malaysia and another appeal [2025] 3 MLJ 320 [CA]

Coram NANTHA BALAN, COLLIN SEQUERAH AND AZIZUL AZMI ADNAN JJCA
Catchwords Civil Procedure — Judicial review — Application for
Outcome Appeal 128 allowed and Appeal 12 dismissed.
Counsel Names

  • S Saravana Kumar (Tan Jia Hua and Dharshini Sharma with him) (Rosli Dahlan Saravana Partnership) for the appellant.

  • Shamsul Bolhassan (Ahmad Hanir Hambali @ Arwi, Liew Horng Bin, Farah Shuhadah, Nur Idayu bt Amir, Azza bt Azmi, Kogilambigai Muthusamy and Krishna Priya a/p Veenagopal @ Venugopal with him) (Attorney General's Chambers) for the respondent.

2. Khairuddin bin Abu Hassan v Wan Aedil bin Wan Abdullah & Ors and another appeal [2025] 3 MLJ 339 [CA]

Coram SEE MEE CHUN, AZHAHARI RAMLI AND AHMAD KAMAL JJCA
Catchwords Criminal Law — Malicious prosecution — Elements to be proved in action for malicious prosecution
Outcome Appeals dismissed.
Counsel Names

  • Mohamed Haniff bin Khatri Abdulla (Nurul Huda bt Razali with him) (Haniff Khatri) in Civil Appeal No W-01(NCvC)(W)-692–09 of 2022 for the appellant.

  • Nur Edziani bt Roleb (with Siti Syakimah bt Ibrahim and Mohd Ashraf bin Abd Hamid) (Attorney General’s Chambers) in Civil Appeal No W-01(NCvC)(W)-692–09 of 2022 for the respondents.

3. The New Straits Times Press (M) Bhd v Aideah Communication Sdn Bhd [2025] 3 MLJ 240 [FC]

Coram ZABARIAH YUSOF, ABDUL KARIM AND AHMAD TERRIRUDIN FCJJ
Catchwords Contract — Terms — Construction of clause
Outcome Appeals dismissed.
Counsel Names

  • Firoz Hussein (Saritha Devi Kirupalani, Choo Shi Jin, Nur Nabila Roslee and Harel Nieryan with him) (Firoz Julian) for appellant.

  • DP Naban (Bahari Yeow Tien Hong, Amina Qistina bt Mohd Idris with him) (Rosli Dahlan Saravana & Partnership) for respondent.

4. Sri Sanjeevan a/l Ramakrishnan v ASP Poonnam E Keling & Ors [2025] 3 MLJ 296 [FC]

Coram HARMINDAR SINGH, ABDUL KARIM AND VAZEER ALAM FCJJ
Catchwords Tort — False imprisonment — Detention
Outcome Appeal dismissed and COA's decision affirmed.
Counsel Names

  • Malik Imtiaz Sarwar (with Preakas Sampunathan, Satchitanandan Vedha Ratnam, Khoo Suk Chyi and Komal Vijay Sheth) (Preakas & Partners) for the appellant.

  • Mohammad Al-Saifi Hashim (with Liew Horng Bin and Nur Ezdiani bt Roleb) (Senior Federal Counsel, Attorney General's Chambers) for the respondent.

Week 3 Updates

1. WTK Realty Sdn Bhd v Kathryn Ma Wai Fong and another appeal [2025] 3 MLJ 401 [CA]

Coram YAACOB MD SAM, RAVINTHRAN AND GHAZALI CHA JJCA
Catchwords Companies and Corporations — Winding up — Just and equitable grounds
Outcome Both appeals dismissed with costs; decision of High Court affirmed.
Counsel Names

  • Sim *** Chuang (Reddi & Co Advocates) in Civil Appeal No Q-02(NCVC)(A)-2476–12 of 2017 for the appellant.

  • Stanley Eddy (with Chan Yin Xi) (Battenberg & Talma Advocates) in Civil Appeal No Q-02(NCVC)(A)-2490–12 of 2017 for the appellants.

  • Alvin Yong Sze Lung (Alvin Yong Advocates) in Civil Appeal No Q-02(NCVC)(A)-2476–12 of 2017 for the respondent.

  • Alvin Yong Sze Lung (Alvin Yong Advocates) in Civil Appeal No Q-02(NCVC)(A)-2490–12 of 2017 for the first respondent.

  • Sim *** Chuang (Reddi & Co Advocates) in Civil Appeal No Q-02(NCVC)(A)-2490–12 of 2017 for the second respondent.

2. Baskaran a/l Govindasamy & Ors v Chiew Yit Kin [2025] 3 MLJ 372 [CA]

Coram NANTHA BALAN, COLLIN SEQUERAH AND AHMAD KAMAL JJCA
Catchwords Land Law — Transfer of land — Fraud
Outcome Appeal dismissed; High Court’s decision affirmed.
Counsel Names

  • R Ramanthan (with S Selvarajah, James Lopez and Joseph Tan) (Fernandez & Selvarajah) for the appellant.

  • Marcus Lee Min Lun (with Emily Wong) (Marcus Lee) for the respondent.

3. Che Sa’adon bin Che Yahya lwn Pendakwa Raya [2025] 3 MLJ 430 [CA]

Coram AHMAD ZAIDI IBRAHIM, MOHAMED ZAINI MAZLAN AND AZMI ARIFFIN HHMR
Catchwords Prosedur Jenayah — Rayuan — Rayuan terhadap sabitan dan hukuman
Outcome Rayuan terhadap sabitan dan hukuman ditolak.
Counsel Names

  • Ahmad Nizam bin Mohamed (Alias Ibrahim & Co) bagi pihak perayu.

  • Muhammad Asraf bin Mohamed (Farah Yasmin bt Salleh bersamanya) (Timbalan Pendakwa Raya, Jabatan Peguam Negara) bagi pihak responden.

4. Muhammad Akmal Zuhairi bin Azmal dan lain-lain lwn Pendakwa Raya [2025] 3 MLJ 464 [FC]

Coram HASNAH HASHIM HB (MALAYA), NORDIN HASSAN DAN ABDUL KARIM HHMP
Catchwords Prosedur Jenayah — Rayuan — Rayuan terhadap sabitan dan hukuman
Outcome Keputusan Mahkamah Rayuan yang mensabitkan perayu-perayu bagi kesalahan di bawah s 302 KK dan Abdoul Hakeem bagi kesalahan di bawah s 109 KK dibaca bersama s 302 KK diketepikan; keputusan Mahkamah Tinggi yang mensabitkan perayu-perayu bagi kesalahan di bawah s 304(a) KK dan Abdoul Hakeem bagi kesalahan di bawah s 109 KK dibaca bersama s 304(a) KK dikembalikan; hukuman penjara 18 tahun dari tarikh tangkap yang dijatuhkan ke atas perayu-perayu dan Abdoul Hakeem oleh hakim Mahkamah Tinggi dikekalkan.
Counsel Names

  • Amer Hamzah bin Arshad (Joshua Tay H’ng Foong, Lee Yee Woei dan Siti Summaiyah bt Ahmad bersamanya) (Amerbon & Assoc) bagi pihak perayu pertama dan kedua.

  • Hisyam Teh Poh Teik (Low Wei Loke bersamanya) (Hisyam Teh) bagi pihak perayu ketiga.

  • M Ramachelvam (Ameerul Radzi bin Azlan bersamanya) (Rama-Rozi & Assoc) bagi pihak perayu keempat.

  • Hazman bin Ahmad (Premman a/l Gopal & fiq dan Rahimi bin Abdul Ghazi bersamanya) (Omar Ismail Hazman & Co) bagi pihak kelima.

  • Mangaiarkarasi a/p Krishnan (Iznina Hahim bt Hashim, Solehah Noratikah bt Ismail dan Joy Jothi Nadrarasan bersamanya) (Jabatan Peguam Negara) bagi pihak responden.

Week 4 Updates

1. Wong Weng Foo v Residensi Laguna Joint Management Body & Ors [2025] 3 MLJ 515 [CA]

Coram KAMALUDIN MD SAID, HASHIM HAMZAH AND COLLIN SEQUERAH JJCA
Catchwords Companies and Corporations — Winding up — Liquidators
Outcome Appeal allowed.
Counsel Names

  • Max Chuah Chern Tee (with Tan Chee Qin and Low Han Shin) (Chuah Qian & Partners) for the appellant.

  • Yuvaraj Sugapathy (with Chandra Sekarali a/l K Kandasamy) for the first respondent.

  • Himahlini Ramalingam (with Fong Ren Ming) (Himahlini & Co) for the third respondent.

2. Dato’ Dr Abd Wahab bin Abd Ghani v Mohd Rashid bin Mohd Noor & Ors [2025] 3 MLJ 532 [CA]

Coram AHMAD ZAIDI IBRAHIM, HASHIM HAMZAH AND FAIZAH JAMALUDIN JJCA
Catchwords Banking — Cheques — Payment of cheque
Outcome Appeal 314 allowed; Appeal 1164 dismissed with costs to Dr Wahab in the sum of RM50,000 here and below subject to allocatur fee.
Counsel Names

  • Ambiga Sreenevasan (Tan Keng Teck, Ung Zhee Laine Einel and Anishaa Sundramoorthy with her) (Lim Kian Leong & Co) in Civil Appeal No W-02(NCvC)(W)-314–03 of 2023 for the appellant.

  • T Gunaseelan (Kailesh Arumugam and Kumaradevan Rajadevan with him) (Kailesh Aru & Co) in Civil Appeal No W-02(NCvC)(W)-1164–07 of 2023 for the appellant.

  • T Gunaseelan (Kailesh Arumugam and Kumaradevan Rajadevan with him) (Kailesh Aru & Co) in Civil Appeal No W-02(NCvC)(W)-314–03 of 2023 for the first respondent.'

  • Thinesh Bathmala (Raja, Darryl & Loh) in Civil Appeal No W-02(NCvC)(W)-314–03 of 2023 for the second respondent.

  • Balakumar Balasundram (Wong Ik Ling with him) (Azim, Tunku Farik & Wong) in Civil Appeal No W-02(NCvC)(W)-314–03 of 2023 for the third respondent.

  • Ambiga Sreenevasan (Tan Keng Teck, Ung Zhee Laine Einel and Anishaa Sundramoorthy with her) (Lim Kian Leong & Co) in Civil Appeal No W-02(NCvC)(W)-1164–07 of 2023 for the first respondent.

  • Thinesh Bathmala (Raja, Darryl & Loh) in Civil Appeal No W-02(NCvC)(W)-1164–07 of 2023 for the second respondent.

  • Balakumar Balasundram (Wong Ik Ling with him) (Azim, Tunku Farik & Wong) in Civil Appeal No W-02(NCvC)(W)-1164–07 of 2023 for the third respondent.

3. Nautilus Tug & Towage Sdn Bhd v Nautical Supreme Sdn Bhd & Ors [2025] 3 MLJ 573 [CA]

Coram HANIPAH FARIKULLAH FCJ, MARIANA YAHYA AND WONG KIAN KHEONG JJCA
Catchwords Companies and Corporations — Directors — Duties and responsibilities
Outcome Appeal dismissed.
Counsel Names

  • Cyrus V Das (with David Thomas Mathews, Olivia Loh, Lai Ann Xing and Koh Jo Vin) (Gananathan Loh) for the appellant.

  • Pang Kong Leng (with Chok Zhin Theng, Jonathan Lim See Kheng and Michelle Chin Zi Shan) (Cheah Teh & Su) for the respondent.

4. Martin Bencher (M) Sdn Bhd v Sapura Energy Bhd & Ors [2025] 3 MLJ 614 [CA]

Coram SEE MEE CHUN, MOHD NAZLAN AND FAIZAH JAMALUDIN JJCA
Catchwords Companies and Corporations — Arrangement, scheme of — Restraint of proceedings
Outcome High Court’s order affirmed; appeal dismissed with cost to respondents.
Counsel Names

  • Renu Zechariah (with Aneera Joshini Chowdhury and Lu Ying Suey) (AJ Chowdhury) for the appellant.

  • Gopal Sreenevasan (with Leong Phaik Leng, Kwong Chiew Ee and Neoh Jin Keat) (Rahmat Lim & Partners) for the respondent.

Don't want to miss out on the latest updates? If you have not subscribed to the MLJ Alerts newsletter, subscribe today so you will be notified on the most recently published case reports.

Get in touch

Email: myln@lexisnexis.com
Phone: +65 6349-0110

All fields are required unless otherwise noted.