By Jo Wade, Senior Director of Product Management, LexisNexis® With contributions from Seeta Bodke, Amanda Hatcher, Nina Packman, Rupert Robey, Jo Wade, and the LexisNexis team. At this year’s...
Australia’s aged care sector is undergoing sweeping reform, bringing tougher oversight, stronger resident protections, and stricter workforce requirements. For providers, the stakes have never...
Is your entity an Australian entity, or one that conducts business in Australia, and does it have an annual consolidated revenue of at least $100 million? Is your business required, as mandated by law...
Your Complimentary Checklist If your organisation has established policies and procedures in relation to the use of Social Media to either promote your business or regulate the conduct of your employees...
Legal drafting is at the core of every lawyer’s skill set, but it’s also one of the most time-consuming, resource-intensive parts of legal practice. With client expectations for speed, cost...
Location data is so rich and revealing of patterns of movement and behaviour that it can oftentimes at least individuate, if not also lead to the identification of, individuals.
Any corporation that collects an individual’s location data may be wrestling with specific challenges to meeting its obligations defined under the Australian Privacy Act.
In fact, the Federal Court of Australia (FCA) recently held that Google partially misled Australian consumers about the collection of their location data when it made on-screen representations on Android mobile phones and tablets.
In this article, the following issues are explored, and recommendations are made which may be helpful for lawyers who are advising stakeholders regarding,
Source: Privacy Law Bulletin (2020, Vol 17, No 5)
Authored by Anna Johnston BA, LLB (Hons I), Grad Dip Leg Prac, Grad Cert Mgmt, MPP (Hons)Principal, Salinger Privacyanna@salingerprivacy.com.auwww.salingerprivacy.com.au
COMPLETE THE FORM TO READ THE FULL ARTICLE