Watch our short video on the new LexisNexis® RegCompliance+ enhancements. What's New: ✓ Risk Matrix Visualisation : helps you gain a clearer understanding of your compliance risk profile and...
With an expanding workload driven by regulatory change, geopolitical uncertainty, and rapid technological disruption, it’s no surprise that 47% of in-house lawyers describe their team as ‘...
Legal AI is transforming the legal profession, but choosing the right solution can be challenging. Watch this on-demand webinar to learn how to evaluate legal AI tools with confidence, avoid common risks...
A practical guide for legal and technology leaders navigating accountability, innovation, and opportunity in Australia’s evolving AI landscape. AI technologies represent this decade’s most...
Watch how Draft in Protégé Draft helps organisations: ✓ Generate high-quality compliance documentation faster ✓ Align documentation with jurisdiction-specific regulatory requirements ✓...
Location data is so rich and revealing of patterns of movement and behaviour that it can oftentimes at least individuate, if not also lead to the identification of, individuals.
Any corporation that collects an individual’s location data may be wrestling with specific challenges to meeting its obligations defined under the Australian Privacy Act.
In fact, the Federal Court of Australia (FCA) recently held that Google partially misled Australian consumers about the collection of their location data when it made on-screen representations on Android mobile phones and tablets.
In this article, the following issues are explored, and recommendations are made which may be helpful for lawyers who are advising stakeholders regarding,
Source: Privacy Law Bulletin (2020, Vol 17, No 5)
Authored by Anna Johnston BA, LLB (Hons I), Grad Dip Leg Prac, Grad Cert Mgmt, MPP (Hons)Principal, Salinger Privacyanna@salingerprivacy.com.auwww.salingerprivacy.com.au
COMPLETE THE FORM TO READ THE FULL ARTICLE