How small law firms can leverage Lexis+ AI to overcome resource constraints, improve service delivery, and foster growth. Background Maguire Legal, founded by Paul Maguire, is an innovative Melbourne...
Before investing in Legal AI for your firm, it's essential to do your research. Dive into "The Definitive Legal AI Buyer’s Guide" to equip you with the knowledge and insights necessary...
YMCA Victoria, recognised the need for a centralised compliance management approach, and partnered with LexisNexis Regulatory Compliance to streamline their processes. This collaboration ensures consistent...
Foresters Financial enhanced its compliance processes by partnering with LexisNexis Regulatory Compliance. This collaboration streamlined workflows, reduced manual tracking, and integrated LexisNexis...
Is your organisation responsible for managing personal or confidential information? Does your organisation have appropriate policies in place for ensuring workplace privacy (i.e. employee records, employee...
Location data is so rich and revealing of patterns of movement and behaviour that it can oftentimes at least individuate, if not also lead to the identification of, individuals.
Any corporation that collects an individual’s location data may be wrestling with specific challenges to meeting its obligations defined under the Australian Privacy Act.
In fact, the Federal Court of Australia (FCA) recently held that Google partially misled Australian consumers about the collection of their location data when it made on-screen representations on Android mobile phones and tablets.
In this article, the following issues are explored, and recommendations are made which may be helpful for lawyers who are advising stakeholders regarding,
Source: Privacy Law Bulletin (2020, Vol 17, No 5)
Authored by Anna Johnston BA, LLB (Hons I), Grad Dip Leg Prac, Grad Cert Mgmt, MPP (Hons)Principal, Salinger Privacyanna@salingerprivacy.com.auwww.salingerprivacy.com.au
COMPLETE THE FORM TO READ THE FULL ARTICLE