Background Founded in 2024, Whitehall & Associates has quickly become one of Australia’s leading personal injury law firms. Committed to building strong, long-term client relationships founded...
Given the recent spate of high-profile cyber attacks, it's a timely reminder for legal advisers to take stock of their clients’ cyber resilience, particularly when it comes to incident response...
Before investing in Legal AI for your firm, it's essential to do your research. Dive into "The Definitive Legal AI Buyer’s Guide" to equip you with the knowledge and insights necessary...
NDIS providers are facing unprecedented financial and regulatory challenges. Success will come to those who prioritise compliance, governance, and financial sustainability. LexisNexis ® Regulatory...
Is your organisation a public company that is listed or intends to be listed on the Australian Stock exchange (ASX)? Does your organisation know and understand the requirements and obligations imposed...
Location data is so rich and revealing of patterns of movement and behaviour that it can oftentimes at least individuate, if not also lead to the identification of, individuals.
Any corporation that collects an individual’s location data may be wrestling with specific challenges to meeting its obligations defined under the Australian Privacy Act.
In fact, the Federal Court of Australia (FCA) recently held that Google partially misled Australian consumers about the collection of their location data when it made on-screen representations on Android mobile phones and tablets.
In this article, the following issues are explored, and recommendations are made which may be helpful for lawyers who are advising stakeholders regarding,
Source: Privacy Law Bulletin (2020, Vol 17, No 5)
Authored by Anna Johnston BA, LLB (Hons I), Grad Dip Leg Prac, Grad Cert Mgmt, MPP (Hons)Principal, Salinger Privacyanna@salingerprivacy.com.auwww.salingerprivacy.com.au
COMPLETE THE FORM TO READ THE FULL ARTICLE