While AI won’t replace your expertise, recent technology advances offer potentially immediate efficiency gains for barristers. The webinar Generative AI for Australian Barristers in 2025 explores...
In the ever-evolving construction industry, collaborative contracting is emerging as a transformative approach that promises to enhance project outcomes through cooperation and shared goals. This paradigm...
Background Founded in 2024, Whitehall & Associates has quickly become one of Australia’s leading personal injury law firms. Committed to building strong, long-term client relationships founded...
Given the recent spate of high-profile cyber attacks, it's a timely reminder for legal advisers to take stock of their clients’ cyber resilience, particularly when it comes to incident response...
Before investing in Legal AI for your firm, it's essential to do your research. Dive into "The Definitive Legal AI Buyer’s Guide" to equip you with the knowledge and insights necessary...
Location data is so rich and revealing of patterns of movement and behaviour that it can oftentimes at least individuate, if not also lead to the identification of, individuals.
Any corporation that collects an individual’s location data may be wrestling with specific challenges to meeting its obligations defined under the Australian Privacy Act.
In fact, the Federal Court of Australia (FCA) recently held that Google partially misled Australian consumers about the collection of their location data when it made on-screen representations on Android mobile phones and tablets.
In this article, the following issues are explored, and recommendations are made which may be helpful for lawyers who are advising stakeholders regarding,
Source: Privacy Law Bulletin (2020, Vol 17, No 5)
Authored by Anna Johnston BA, LLB (Hons I), Grad Dip Leg Prac, Grad Cert Mgmt, MPP (Hons)Principal, Salinger Privacyanna@salingerprivacy.com.auwww.salingerprivacy.com.au
COMPLETE THE FORM TO READ THE FULL ARTICLE