In this LexisNexis® Leading Edge webinar, you'll discover how Legal AI is set to transform your small law firm’s productivity, performance, and profitability like never before. This session...
See how Lexis+ AI drove significant ROI for interviewed customers in a study from Forrester Consulting commissioned by LexisNexis. Download the The Total Economic Impact™ of Lexis+ AI for Large Law...
Before investing in Legal AI for your firm, it's essential to do your research. Dive into "The Definitive Legal AI Buyer’s Guide" to equip you with the knowledge and insights necessary...
If you’re evaluating legal AI for your in-house legal team, you’re in the right place. The pressure on legal leaders to embrace new technology while delivering more value to the organisation...
In this LexisNexis® Leading Edge webinar, key questions about legal AI are explored in detail, with a focus on both the practical and technical aspects of implementation. The session unpacks why AI...
Location data is so rich and revealing of patterns of movement and behaviour that it can oftentimes at least individuate, if not also lead to the identification of, individuals.
Any corporation that collects an individual’s location data may be wrestling with specific challenges to meeting its obligations defined under the Australian Privacy Act.
In fact, the Federal Court of Australia (FCA) recently held that Google partially misled Australian consumers about the collection of their location data when it made on-screen representations on Android mobile phones and tablets.
In this article, the following issues are explored, and recommendations are made which may be helpful for lawyers who are advising stakeholders regarding,
Source: Privacy Law Bulletin (2020, Vol 17, No 5)
Authored by Anna Johnston BA, LLB (Hons I), Grad Dip Leg Prac, Grad Cert Mgmt, MPP (Hons)Principal, Salinger Privacyanna@salingerprivacy.com.auwww.salingerprivacy.com.au
COMPLETE THE FORM TO READ THE FULL ARTICLE