Background The Dymocks story is one of a celebrated family business with a long tradition and a small, busy legal team embracing modern legal technology. Dymocks is a diverse family-owned business...
This checklist is designed to assist legal counsels and governance professionals in guiding their board of directors on how to prepare for Australia’s new mandatory climate reporting regime which...
Explore how AI is transforming legal workflows, empowering practitioners to focus on what truly matters - delivering value to their clients. This webinar features real-world AI use cases reshaping modern...
In this episode of LexisNexis® Legal Talk Podcast, host Kiren Chitkara and guest Greg Russo explore the New Aged Care Act and supporting framework, which came into effect on 1 November 2025. The...
As one of Australia’s leading law firms, McCabes has embraced innovation to deliver faster and smarter legal services. Combining the resources of a large firm with the personalised service of a boutique...
Location data is so rich and revealing of patterns of movement and behaviour that it can oftentimes at least individuate, if not also lead to the identification of, individuals.
Any corporation that collects an individual’s location data may be wrestling with specific challenges to meeting its obligations defined under the Australian Privacy Act.
In fact, the Federal Court of Australia (FCA) recently held that Google partially misled Australian consumers about the collection of their location data when it made on-screen representations on Android mobile phones and tablets.
In this article, the following issues are explored, and recommendations are made which may be helpful for lawyers who are advising stakeholders regarding,
Source: Privacy Law Bulletin (2020, Vol 17, No 5)
Authored by Anna Johnston BA, LLB (Hons I), Grad Dip Leg Prac, Grad Cert Mgmt, MPP (Hons)Principal, Salinger Privacyanna@salingerprivacy.com.auwww.salingerprivacy.com.au
COMPLETE THE FORM TO READ THE FULL ARTICLE