Ensure organisation-wide compliance with the Australian Employment Compliance Checklist. Authored by Dominic Fleeton, Partner at K&L Gates, this practical tool is built from the trusted content of...
AI-enabled monitoring, biometrics, and algorithmic management are reshaping today’s workplace — and with that shift comes a new compliance frontier. From privacy and data governance to bias...
Artificial intelligence is transforming business and revolutionising industries in ways we've never seen before. From powering voice assistants like Siri and Alexa to advancing healthcare through innovative...
Background The Dymocks story is one of a celebrated family business with a long tradition and a small, busy legal team embracing modern legal technology. Dymocks is a diverse family-owned business...
This checklist is designed to assist legal counsels and governance professionals in guiding their board of directors on how to prepare for Australia’s new mandatory climate reporting regime which...
Location data is so rich and revealing of patterns of movement and behaviour that it can oftentimes at least individuate, if not also lead to the identification of, individuals.
Any corporation that collects an individual’s location data may be wrestling with specific challenges to meeting its obligations defined under the Australian Privacy Act.
In fact, the Federal Court of Australia (FCA) recently held that Google partially misled Australian consumers about the collection of their location data when it made on-screen representations on Android mobile phones and tablets.
In this article, the following issues are explored, and recommendations are made which may be helpful for lawyers who are advising stakeholders regarding,
Source: Privacy Law Bulletin (2020, Vol 17, No 5)
Authored by Anna Johnston BA, LLB (Hons I), Grad Dip Leg Prac, Grad Cert Mgmt, MPP (Hons)Principal, Salinger Privacyanna@salingerprivacy.com.auwww.salingerprivacy.com.au
COMPLETE THE FORM TO READ THE FULL ARTICLE