Australia stands at a critical juncture in privacy and artificial intelligence (AI) regulation. The Privacy and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2024 was passed on 29 November 2024, alongside cybersecurity...
This new whitepaper from LexisNexis covers findings from a series of discussions jointly hosted by LexisNexis and the Governance Institute of Australia with industry leaders, on how organisations can prepare...
As Australian businesses navigate a rapidly changing risk landscape, the importance of digital transformation has never been greater. We’ve collaborated with our technology partner ReadiNow, who...
Ensuring operational resilience has become a critical priority for Australian and New Zealand organizations but navigating the complexities of CPS 230 can be daunting. They will need to establish appropriate...
Ben has observed that he now saves one-third of the time he would typically spend on legal research. Background Clifford Gouldson is a prominent law firm located in Toowoomba, Queensland, with additional...
Location data is so rich and revealing of patterns of movement and behaviour that it can oftentimes at least individuate, if not also lead to the identification of, individuals.
Any corporation that collects an individual’s location data may be wrestling with specific challenges to meeting its obligations defined under the Australian Privacy Act.
In fact, the Federal Court of Australia (FCA) recently held that Google partially misled Australian consumers about the collection of their location data when it made on-screen representations on Android mobile phones and tablets.
In this article, the following issues are explored, and recommendations are made which may be helpful for lawyers who are advising stakeholders regarding,
Source: Privacy Law Bulletin (2020, Vol 17, No 5)
Authored by Anna Johnston BA, LLB (Hons I), Grad Dip Leg Prac, Grad Cert Mgmt, MPP (Hons)Principal, Salinger Privacyanna@salingerprivacy.com.auwww.salingerprivacy.com.au
COMPLETE THE FORM TO READ THE FULL ARTICLE