While technology powers legal AI, it is the content that truly fuels its impact. In this episode, we explore why high-quality, legal content is essential to delivering accurate, AI outcomes. From legal...
Forrester Consulting conducted an independent Total Economic Impact™ study of Lexis+ Al for corporate legal departments, commissioned by LexisNexis® in June 2025. Related Content: How...
Dive into the next evolution of legal tech with our latest Legal Talk podcast Legal AI Evolves: Exploring Agentic AI and Its Impact on Legal Practice. Discover what agentic AI is and how it's transforming...
How small law firms can leverage Lexis+ AI to overcome resource constraints, improve service delivery, and foster growth. Background Maguire Legal, founded by Paul Maguire, is an innovative Melbourne...
Before investing in Legal AI for your firm, it's essential to do your research. Dive into "The Definitive Legal AI Buyer’s Guide" to equip you with the knowledge and insights necessary...
Location data is so rich and revealing of patterns of movement and behaviour that it can oftentimes at least individuate, if not also lead to the identification of, individuals.
Any corporation that collects an individual’s location data may be wrestling with specific challenges to meeting its obligations defined under the Australian Privacy Act.
In fact, the Federal Court of Australia (FCA) recently held that Google partially misled Australian consumers about the collection of their location data when it made on-screen representations on Android mobile phones and tablets.
In this article, the following issues are explored, and recommendations are made which may be helpful for lawyers who are advising stakeholders regarding,
Source: Privacy Law Bulletin (2020, Vol 17, No 5)
Authored by Anna Johnston BA, LLB (Hons I), Grad Dip Leg Prac, Grad Cert Mgmt, MPP (Hons)Principal, Salinger Privacyanna@salingerprivacy.com.auwww.salingerprivacy.com.au
COMPLETE THE FORM TO READ THE FULL ARTICLE