The legal industry is at a turning point. AI is no longer just a tool supporting isolated tasks, it’s becoming embedded directly into legal workflows, transforming how work gets done. Traditionally...
Significant changes to NSW workplace laws have taken effect, and employers need to act now. The Industrial Relations and Other Legislation Amendment (Workplace Protections) Act 2025 introduced major...
Australia’s legal and commercial landscape is rapidly being re-shaped by the convergence of Artificial intelligence (AI) and AI Governance, cloud services and the requisite data-centre infrastructure...
What can Protégé do for Australian barristers and how can it transform the way you work? In this episode, Laura Procter and Jo Nealon from LexisNexis® unpack four key litigation workflows...
How is AI transforming legal work? With AI swiftly emerging as the general-purpose technology of this century, executives are directing AI resources towards improving time-intensive, repetitive tasks...
Location data is so rich and revealing of patterns of movement and behaviour that it can oftentimes at least individuate, if not also lead to the identification of, individuals.
Any corporation that collects an individual’s location data may be wrestling with specific challenges to meeting its obligations defined under the Australian Privacy Act.
In fact, the Federal Court of Australia (FCA) recently held that Google partially misled Australian consumers about the collection of their location data when it made on-screen representations on Android mobile phones and tablets.
In this article, the following issues are explored, and recommendations are made which may be helpful for lawyers who are advising stakeholders regarding,
Source: Privacy Law Bulletin (2020, Vol 17, No 5)
Authored by Anna Johnston BA, LLB (Hons I), Grad Dip Leg Prac, Grad Cert Mgmt, MPP (Hons)Principal, Salinger Privacyanna@salingerprivacy.com.auwww.salingerprivacy.com.au
COMPLETE THE FORM TO READ THE FULL ARTICLE