Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.
76 F.3d 984 *; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39867 **; 37 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1872 ***; 96 Daily Journal DAR 1722
LOTTFIE "LOU" ADRAY; ADRAY'S CBS PREMIUMS, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ADRY-MART, INC.; PARVIS NAVI; E. MATINKHOO; EINOLA MATEEN; MUSAD HAKIM, Defendants-Appellees.
Subsequent History: [**1] As Amended on Denial of Rehearing and Suggestion of Rehearing En Banc February 15, 1996.
Prior History: Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. D.C. No. CV-90-01688-AWT. A. Wallace Tashima, District Judge, Presiding.
Original Opinion Previously Reported at: 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 29438.
Disposition: AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.
advertising, secondary meaning, district court, infringement, profits, disclaimer, injunction, likelihood of confusion, circulation, corrective, willful, sales, market area, equitable, circumstances, damages, medium, costs, media, bad faith, instructions, customers, channels, consumer, factors, argues
Civil Procedure, Jury Trials, Jury Instructions, General Overview, Governments, Courts, Judicial Precedent, Trademark Law, Likelihood of Confusion, Consumer Confusion, Subject Matter of Trademarks, Terms Requiring Secondary Meaning, Business & Corporate Compliance, Entertainment Industry Falsity & Performance Misattribution, Trade Dress Protection, Causes of Action, Labels, Packaging & Trade Dress, Factors for Determining Confusion, Intent of Defendant to Confuse, Comparison of Advertising, Remedies, Damages, Types of Commercial Transactions, Sales of Goods, Similarity of Marks, Appearance, Meaning & Sound, Eligibility for Trademark Protection, Strength of Trademark, Particular Subject Matter, Names, Personal Names, Appeals, Standards of Review, Injunctions, Permanent Injunctions