Allegheny Def. Project v. FERC
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
December 5, 2019, Filed
No. 17-1098 Consolidated with 17-1128, 17-1263, 18-1030
Upon consideration of the petition for rehearing en banc filed by Hilltop Hollow Limited Partnership, Hilltop Hollow Limited Partnership, LLC, and Stephen D. Hoffman, the responses thereto, and the vote in favor of the petition by a majority of the judges eligible to participate, it is
ORDERED that the petition be granted. These consolidated cases will be reheard by the court sitting en banc. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the court's judgment filed August 2, 2019, be vacated. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the oral argument before the en banc court be heard on Tuesday, March 31, 2020 at 9:30 a.m. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that, in addition to filing briefs electronically, the parties file 30 paper copies of each of the briefs and the appendix, in accordance with the following schedule:
Joint brief for petitioners. January 10, 2020
Appendix. January 10, 2020
Brief for respondent. February 10, 2020
Joint brief for intervenors supporting respondent. February 10, 2020
Joint reply brief for petitioners. March [**5] 2, 2020
The parties are directed to address in their briefs the issues raised in Section II, Part C of the opinion and in the concurring opinion, including whether the Natural Gas Act, and specifically 15 U.S.C. § 717r(a), authorizes the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to issue tolling orders that extend the statutory 30-day period for Commission action on an application for rehearing.
To enhance the clarity of their briefs, the parties are urged to limit the use of abbreviations, including acronyms. While acronyms may be used for entities and statutes with widely recognized initials, briefs should not contain acronyms that are not widely known. See D.C. Circuit Handbook of Practice and Internal Procedures 41 (2018); Notice Regarding Use of Acronyms (D.C. Cir. Jan. 26, 2010).
Parties are strongly encouraged to hand deliver the paper copies of their briefs to the Clerk's office on the date due. Filing by mail may delay the processing of the brief. Additionally, counsel are reminded that if filing by mail, they must use a class of mail that is at least as expeditious as first-class mail. See Fed. R. App. P. 25(a). All briefs and appendices must contain the date that the case is scheduled for oral argument at the top of the [**6] cover. See D.C. Cir. Rule 28(a)(8).Read The Full CaseNot a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free.
Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.
943 F.3d 496 *; 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 36325 **; 2019 WL 6605464
Allegheny Defense Project, et al., Petitioners v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondent
Prior History: [**1] Anadarko Energy Services Company, et al., Intervenors. FERC-CP15-138-000. FERC-CP15-138-001. FERC-CP15-138-003. FERC-CP15-138-004. FERC-CP17-212-000.
Allegheny Def. Project v. FERC, 932 F.3d 940, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 23147 (D.C. Cir., Aug. 2, 2019)
oral argument, acronyms, parties, mail, en banc, appendix, scheduled, copies, top