Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.
923 F.3d 159 *; 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 12127 **
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF POLITICAL CONSULTANTS, INC.; DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF OREGON, INC.; PUBLIC POLICY POLLING, LLC; WASHINGTON STATE DEMOCRATIC CENTRAL COMMITTEE, Plaintiffs — Appellants, and TEA PARTY FORWARD PAC, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION; WILLIAM P. BARR, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, Defendants — Appellees.
Subsequent History: Rehearing, en banc, denied by Am. Ass'n of Political Consultants, Inc. v. FCC, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 18688 (4th Cir., June 21, 2019)
US Supreme Court certiorari granted by Barr v. Am. Ass'n of Political Consultants, 140 S. Ct. 812, 205 L. Ed. 2d 449, 2020 U.S. LEXIS 2 (U.S., Jan. 10, 2020)
Motion denied by Barr v. Consultants, 2020 U.S. LEXIS 3053 (U.S., June 8, 2020)
Prior History: [**1] Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. 5:16-cv-00252-D. James C. Dever III, District Judge.
Am. Ass'n of Political Consultants v. Sessions, 323 F. Supp. 3d 737, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48883 (E.D.N.C., Mar. 24, 2018)
Disposition: VACATED AND REMANDED.
exemption, debt-collection, automated, ban, phone, content-based, privacy, contravenes, intrusive, tailored, flawed, underinclusive, consumers, narrowly, facially
Antitrust & Trade Law, Consumer Protection, Telemarketing, Business & Corporate Compliance, Communications Law, Federal Acts, Telephone Consumer Protection Act, Civil Procedure, Appeals, Standards of Review, De Novo Review, Summary Judgment Review, Standards of Review, Judgments, Summary Judgment, Entitlement as Matter of Law, Reviewability of Lower Court Decisions, Preservation for Review, Constitutional Law, Fundamental Freedoms, Freedom of Speech, Scope, Governments, Legislation, Severability