Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.

Share your feedback on this Case Opinion Preview

Thank You For Submiting Feedback!

Experience a New Era in Legal Research with Free Access to Lexis+

  • Case Opinion

Beal v. Outfield Brew House, LLC

Beal v. Outfield Brew House, LLC

United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

November 17, 2021, Submitted; March 24, 2022, Filed

No. 20-1961, No. 20-3581

Opinion

GRASZ, Circuit Judge.

This is a consolidated appeal with a single issue: whether an automated marketing system that sends promotional text messages to phone numbers randomly selected from a database of customers' information is an automated telephone dialing system (an "Autodialer") under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (the "TCPA"). The district court1 held it was not. We agree.

I. Background

Appellees Outfield Brew House, LLC and Truman Road Development, LLC operate separate bar establishments (the "Establishments"). The Establishments [*3]  use a marketing software called "Txt Live," which allows them to send text messages to former and potential customers. Appellants are persons who received promotional text messages from one of the Establishments through Txt Live. Appellants argue these messages violated the TCPA because they were sent using an Autodialer without Appellants' consent. The sole dispute in this appeal is whether Txt Live falls within the TCPA's definition of an Autodialer.

Understanding the function of the Txt Live software is central to resolving this issue. Txt Live is used to maintain a database that stores the contact information of the Establishments' former and potential customers. The Establishments' employees manually enter the contact information, including phone numbers, into the Txt Live database. Txt Live is not capable of randomly or sequentially generating phone numbers.

To send a mass text message through Txt Live, employees first narrow the list of recipients using filters. Txt Live's filters can limit text messages to a certain target audience based on a variety of demographic factors. Next, the employees select the number of potential customers to whom the text message will be sent. The [*4]  employees then draft or select the content of the message and hit "send."

When the employees hit "send," Txt Live performs a few tasks. First, Txt Live applies the chosen filters. Txt Live then shuffles the target contacts using a numerically-based randomizer. If the number of people who meet the filtered criteria exceed the number of people to whom the message will be sent, Txt Live selects the recipients at the top of the randomized list first. Appellants compare the system to shuffling a deck of cards and then taking cards from the top of the shuffled deck. The manually entered phone numbers are shuffled, and Txt Live selects the recipients from the top of the shuffled list. Txt Live then sends the message to the selected phone numbers.

Read The Full CaseNot a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free.

Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.

2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 7748 *; 2022 WL 868697

Colby L. Beal, Plaintiff - Appellant v. Outfield Brew House, LLC, doing business as Budweiser Brew House, Defendant - Appellee;Zachary Smith, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; Brian Kagarice, Plaintiffs - Appellants v. Truman Road Development, LLC, doing business as No Other Pub, formerly known as Kansas City Sporting and Social Club, LLC; The Cordish Companies, Inc.; Entertainment Consulting International, LLC, Defendants - Appellees United States of America, Intervenor - Appellee

Prior History:  [*1] Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri.

Beal v. Outfield Brew House, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22487 (W.D. Mo., Feb. 10, 2020)

CORE TERMS

phone number, generator, random, select, sequential, text message, producing, dials, Establishments, randomly, customers, shuffled, telephone number, employees, includes

Civil Procedure, Appeals, Standards of Review, De Novo Review, Summary Judgment Review, Standards of Review, Governments, Legislation, Interpretation