Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.

Share your feedback on this Case Opinion Preview

Thank You For Submiting Feedback!

Experience a New Era in Legal Research with Free Access to Lexis+

  • Case Opinion

Biden v. Missouri

Biden v. Missouri

Supreme Court of the United States

January 13, 2022, Decided

Nos. 21A240 and 21A241.

Opinion

 [**435]   [*650]  Per Curiam.

The Secretary of Health and Human Services administers the Medicare and Medicaid programs, which provide health insurance for millions of elderly, disabled, and low-income Americans. In November 2021, the Secretary announced that, in order to receive Medicare and Medicaid funding, participating facilities must ensure that their staff—unless exempt for medical or religious reasons—are vaccinated against COVID-19. 86 Fed. Reg. 61555 (2021). Two District Courts enjoined enforcement of the  [**436]  rule, and the Government now asks us to stay those injunctions. Agreeing that it is entitled to such relief, we grant the applications.

The Medicare program provides health insurance to individuals 65 and older, as well as those with specified disabilities. The Medicaid program does the same for those with low incomes. ] Both Medicare and Medicaid are administered by the Secretary of Health and Human Services, who has general statutory authority to promulgate regulations “as may be necessary to the efficient administration of the functions with which [he] is charged.” 42 U. S. C. §1302(a).

] One such function—perhaps the most basic, given [***2]  the Department’s core mission—is to ensure that the healthcare providers who care for Medicare and Medicaid patients protect their patients’ health and safety. Such providers include hospitals, nursing homes, ambulatory surgical centers, hospices, rehabilitation facilities, and more. To that end, Congress authorized the Secretary to promulgate, as a condition of a facility’s participation in the programs, such “requirements as [he] finds necessary in the interest of the health and safety of individuals who are furnished services in the institution.” 42 U. S. C. §1395x(e)(9) (hospitals); see, e.g., §§1395x(cc)(2)(J) (outpatient rehabilitation facilities), 1395i-3(d)(4)(B) (skilled nursing facilities), 1395k(a)(2)(F)(i) (ambulatory surgical centers); see also §§1396r(d)(4)(B), 1396d(l)(1), 1396d(o) (corresponding provisions in Medicaid Act).

Relying on these authorities, the Secretary has established long lists of detailed conditions with which facilities must comply to be eligible to receive Medicare and Medicaid funds. See, e.g., 42 CFR pt. 482 (2020) (hospitals); 42 CFR pt. 483 (long-term care facilities); 42 CFR §§416.25-416.54 (ambulatory surgical centers). Such conditions have long included a requirement  [*651]  that certain providers maintain and enforce an “infection prevention and control program designed . . . to help prevent the development and [***3]  transmission of communicable diseases and infections.” §483.80 (long-term care facilities); see, e.g., §§482.42(a) (hospitals), 416.51(b) (ambulatory surgical centers), 485.725 (facilities that provide outpatient physical therapy and speech-language pathology services).

Read The Full CaseNot a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free.

Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.

142 S. Ct. 647 *; 211 L. Ed. 2d 433 **; 2022 U.S. LEXIS 495 ***; 2022 WL 120950

JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL., APPLICANTS v. MISSOURI, ET AL.; XAVIER BECERRA, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ET AL., APPLICANTS v. LOUISIANA, ET AL.

Notice: The pagination of this document is subject to change pending release of the final published version.

Prior History:  [***1] ON APPLICATIONS FOR STAYS

Missouri v. Biden, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 227410 (E.D. Mo., Nov. 29, 2021)Louisiana v. Becerra, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 229949 (W.D. La., Nov. 30, 2021)

CORE TERMS

vaccine, patient, facilities, healthcare worker, regulations, authorizes, provisions, health and safety, infection, good cause, long-term, programs, injunctions, conditions, omnibus, notice-and-comment, providers, interim, Courts, staff, statutory authority, strong showing, care facility, writ petition, terminate, diseases, mandates, centers, notice, healthcare

Public Health & Welfare Law, Social Security, Medicare, Coverage, Medicaid, Healthcare Law, Actions Against Facilities, Facility Liability, Nursing Facilities, Healthcare, Services for Disabled & Elderly Persons, Costs, Providers, Types of Providers, Medicare Act Interpretation, Hospitals, Administrative Law, Judicial Review, Standards of Review, Arbitrary & Capricious Standard of Review, Agency Rulemaking, Notice & Comment Requirements, Governments, Federal Government, Employees & Officials