Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.

Share your feedback on this Case Opinion Preview

Thank You For Submiting Feedback!

Experience a New Era in Legal Research with Free Access to Lexis+

  • Case Opinion

Bunker v. Association of Missouri Electric Coop.

Bunker v. Association of Missouri Electric Coop.

Court of Appeals of Missouri, Western District

August 11, 1992, Filed

No. WD 45380

Opinion

 [*609]  The appellant, Terry Bunker, was employed by Nodaway Worth Electric Cooperative (hereafter "Nodaway") as a groundman. Nodaway is a member of the Association of Missouri Electric Cooperatives (hereafter "the Association"), the defendant respondent. The Association is a non-profit organization which provides various services to its members, including safety training. Bunker brought suit against the Association alleging it failed to exercise reasonable care in furnishing educational services to him and his co-employees in safety [**2]  matters which caused his injuries. The trial court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment on the grounds that there was no genuine issue of material fact. The events which gave rise to this litigation are as follows.

The plaintiff was hired by Nodaway in June 1981, at which time he was 21 years old and had a high school diploma. On March 27, 1983, an ice storm swept through Worth County and downed a  [*610]  "phase" line which the plaintiff's team was sent to repair. The team consisted of Mr. Fred Poppa, operations manager of Nodaway, Mr. Barry McClelland, and the plaintiff. The damage was done to a single phase system. This type of system consists of two wires, one on top of the other. The top line was a phase wire, which was energized; the bottom line was a neutral wire. The storm had broken the top line, or phase wire. The team cut down the phase wire and let it remain on the ground. It then used the existing neutral wire to replace the downed phase wire. Because the team had been working long hours, this was their last job, and it was a quick method of getting the power back on, they did not dispose of the phase wire or replace the neutral. The repair is described [**3]  as an "open neutral." Service was restored to the area. This method of repair is not an acceptable procedure, although it is done.

Four days following the initial repair, the plaintiff, along with others, were sent to make final repairs to the downed line. Upon arrival, the plaintiff got out of his truck and began pulling the cut line out of the bushes where the phase line had been dropped when the open neutral repair was done. He apparently came in contact with a wire lopped over the phase wire. The downed line was touching the energized line causing it to be charged with 7200 volts of electricity. Although rubber gloves were in the truck, he did not wear them. Bunker received serious injuries.

Read The Full CaseNot a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free.

Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.

839 S.W.2d 608 *; 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1339 **

TERRY BUNKER, Appellant, vs. ASSOCIATION OF MISSOURI ELECTRIC COOPERATIVES, Respondent, FEDERATED RURAL ELECTRIC INS. Intervenor.

Subsequent History:  [**1]  Appellant's Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied October 5, 1992.

Prior History: APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF WORTH COUNTY. The Honorable Lloyd Glen Zahnd, Judge

Disposition: Order of summary judgment affirmed.

CORE TERMS

repair, wire, phase, summary judgment, taught, teach, seminars, team

Civil Procedure, Summary Judgment, Entitlement as Matter of Law, General Overview, Appeals, Summary Judgment Review, Motions for Summary Judgment, Genuine Disputes, Materiality of Facts, Torts, Standards of Care, Reasonable Care, Reasonable Person, Negligence, Recognition of Risk, Elements, Duty