Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.

Share your feedback on this Case Opinion Preview

Thank You For Submiting Feedback!

Experience a New Era in Legal Research with Free Access to Lexis+

  • Case Opinion

Cherokee County Cogeneration Partners, L.P. v. Dynegy Mktg. & Trade

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston

December 22, 2009, Opinion Filed

NO. 14-08-00086-CV

Opinion

 [*311]  This commercial dispute arises from a natural-gas seller's failure to deliver an agreed quantity of gas to the purchaser, appellant Cherokee County Cogeneration Partners, L.P. ("Cherokee"). The seller, appellee Dynegy Marketing and Trade, 2 successfully moved for summary judgment by arguing Cherokee seeks only consequential "lost profits" damages disclaimed by the parties' contract. We hold Cherokee has alleged compensable direct damages under the contract. Therefore, we reverse and remand.

BACKGROUND

Pursuant to a take-or-pay Gas Purchase Agreement (the "Agreement"), 3 Dynegy must supply, and Cherokee must purchase, a fixed quantity of natural gas daily at an agreed-upon price that is identified in the Agreement as the "Commodity Charge." Under the Agreement, Cherokee  [**2] may use the purchased gas at its discretion to fuel its cogeneration facility or resell the gas to third parties.

When Hurricanes Katrina and Rita struck the Gulf Coast in the fall of 2005, Dynegy declared force majeure. From August 29 through October 3, Dynegy did not supply the full contract amount of natural gas, which prompted Cherokee to operate its cogeneration facility in some diminished capacity. During that time, the market price of natural gas skyrocketed to an amount between five and ten times the Commodity Charge specified in the Agreement.

Cherokee demanded Dynegy support its force majeure declaration with the "full particulars" of its inability to perform. After Dynegy refused Cherokee's request to audit its financial records, Cherokee sued Dynegy for breach of contract and declaratory judgment. Cherokee alleged Dynegy  [*312]  could have performed its contract obligations but instead improperly declared force majeure to capitalize on the higher market price. 4 

In its petition, Cherokee pleaded damages according to a formula contained in Section 5.2 of the Agreement. Briefly, that provision identified Cherokee's breach-of-contract remedy, as to the undelivered natural gas, as the difference between the Commodity Charge and market price.

Read The Full CaseNot a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free.

Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.

305 S.W.3d 309 *; 2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 9682 **

CHEROKEE COUNTY COGENERATION PARTNERS, L.P., Appellant v. DYNEGY MARKETING AND TRADE, DYNEGY GP, INC., DMT HOLDINGS, L.P., DMT G.P., L.L.C., and CHEVRON U.S.A., INC., Appellees

Prior History:  [**1] On Appeal from the 55th District Court, Harris County, Texas. Trial Court Cause No. 2006-07706A.

CORE TERMS

damages, consequential damages, profits, Buyer, Seller, market price, resell, direct damage, consequential, natural gas, Commodity, summary judgment, third party, cogeneration, Quantity

Civil Procedure, Appeals, Summary Judgment Review, Standards of Review, Contracts Law, Contract Interpretation, General Overview, Remedies, Damages, Torts, Measurement of Damages, Foreseeable Damages, Lost Profits, Commercial Law (UCC), Buyer Remedies