Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.

Share your feedback on this Case Opinion Preview

Thank You For Submiting Feedback!

Experience a New Era in Legal Research with Free Access to Lexis+

  • Case Opinion

City of Houston v. Carlson

City of Houston v. Carlson

Supreme Court of Texas

September 18, 2014, Argued; December 19, 2014, Opinion Delivered

NO. 13-0435

Opinion

 [*829]  A group of former condominium owners brings this inverse-condemnation action against the City of Houston, alleging their property was taken when the city ordered residents to vacate the condominium complex. The trial court sustained a plea to the jurisdiction after concluding the owners had not alleged a taking. The court of appeals reversed, and we granted the city's petition for [**2]  review. Having considered the record and relevant law, we agree with the trial court that the claim must be dismissed.

In 2007, a private dispute arose among members of a homeowners association. Park Memorial was a 108-unit condominium complex located in the Rice Military area of Houston. The complex was suffering from an increasing number of cosmetic and structural problems, and the condominium owners disagreed as to how best to address those issues. A majority wanted to market the entire property for redevelopment, but a few refused to sell. In July of 2008, one owner—in an apparent effort to encourage action—informed the City of Houston of certain safety concerns.

The city's subsequent investigation revealed various alleged structural, electrical, and plumbing problems. Of primary concern was evidence that an underground parking facility might fail, posing serious risk to the dozens of units located above the garage. Although the respondents fervently deny that the condominiums were unsafe, the record includes numerous photographs documenting various code violations.

After reviewing the results of its investigation, the city declared the condominiums uninhabitable. Officials posted [**3]  the following notice throughout the complex:

NOTICE

Read The Full CaseNot a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free.

Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.

451 S.W.3d 828 *; 2014 Tex. LEXIS 1209 **; 58 Tex. Sup. J. 158

CITY OF HOUSTON, PETITIONER, v. JAMES & ELIZABETH CARLSON, ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Subsequent History: Rehearing denied by City of Houston v. Carlson, 2015 Tex. LEXIS 105 (Tex., Jan. 30, 2015)

Prior History:  [**1] On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for the Fourteenth District of Texas.

Carlson v. City of Houston, 401 S.W.3d 725, 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 5414 (Tex. App. Houston 14th Dist., 2013)

CORE TERMS

condominium, regulation, vacate, private property, inverse-condemnation, due-process, residents, regulatory taking, court of appeals, notice

Governments, Local Governments, Claims By & Against, Civil Procedure, Appeals, Standards of Review, De Novo Review, Real Property Law, Inverse Condemnation, Defenses, Constitutional Law, Bill of Rights, Fundamental Rights, Eminent Domain & Takings, State & Territorial Governments, Responses, Defenses, Demurrers & Objections, Motions to Dismiss, Police Power, Search & Seizure, Scope of Protection, Quartering of Soldiers, Constitutional Issues, Regulatory Takings, Elements, Involuntary Acquisition & Diminution of Value, Takings, Procedural Due Process, General Overview