Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.

Share your feedback on this Case Opinion Preview

Thank You For Submiting Feedback!

Experience a New Era in Legal Research with Free Access to Lexis+

  • Case Opinion

CMA CGM S.A. v. Leader Int'l Express Corp.

CMA CGM S.A. v. Leader Int'l Express Corp.

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Norfolk Division

July 21, 2020, Decided; July 22, 2020, Filed

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:19-cv-357

Opinion

 [*810]  AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Before the Court are Leader Intl Express Corp.'s ("Leader") Motion for Summary Judgment and CMA CGM S.A.'s ("CMA") Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. ECF Nos. 18,20. Both parties filed supporting memoranda and exhibits in support of their motions. ECF Nos. 18-22. Having been fully briefed, this matter is ripe for judicial determination.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

This litigation concerns a breach of a maritime contract ("service contract") between Leader, a non-vessel operating common carrier ("NVOCC"), and CMA, a vessel operating common carrier, for failure to pay demurrage, detention, and related charges for containers subjected to a lengthy custom hold. ECF No. 1 at ¶ 4-6; ECF No. 19 at ¶ 1. The following facts are undisputed: On May 18,2016, CMA and Leader entered into [**2]  a service contract where CMA, the carrier, would ship cargo for Leader, the shipper, with Leader to pay for shipping and guarantee a minimum quantity of containers to ship. The service contract incorporated CMA's tariffs CMDU 037, 020, 100, and 044, as well as the terms and conditions of its bill of landing.1 ECF No. 19 at ¶ 2; ECF No. 21 at  [*811]  ¶ 5. Relevant here, the service contract provides that NVOCC is responsible to the carrier for fees incurred for shipments, including detention and demurrage. ECF No. 19 at ¶ 6.

Detention is "the charge the Merchant pays for detaining Carrier equipment outside the port, terminal or depot, beyond the free time." ECF No. 1-9 at 12; ECF No. 21 at1 6(d). Demurrage is "the charge, related to the use of the equipment only, the Merchant pays for Carrier's equipment beyond the free time allowed by Carrier for taking delivery of goods in the port, terminal or depot." ECF No. 1-9 at 13; ECF No. 21 at ¶ 6(b). Demurrage includes storage, equipment, and reefer service costs. Id. Gates fees charged by the Marine Terminal Operator ("MTO") are an additional demurrage cost. ECF No. 21 at ¶ 6(f).

CMDU 100, Rule 200 and CMDU 100, Rule 300 set forth the terms for detention and [**3]  demurrage. ECF No. 19 at 114. The applicable detention rate for booking is $115 per day except for permitted free time through day 10, and then $165 per day thereafter. ECF No. 21 at ¶ 6(e); ECF No. 1-3. The demurrage rate for bookings is $160 per day except for permitted free time. ECF No. 21 at ¶ 6(c); ECF No. 1-2. Free time consists "of the day the equipment is interchanged plus the next four working days: Saturdays, Sundays and holidays shall be excluded. Upon expiration of free time, per diem charges [are] assessed on a straight calendar day basis until the equipment is returned." ECF No. 1-3 (CMDU 100, Rule 300). The daily charge for carrier equipment containers kept beyond the free time, includes 5 free working days in all U.S. ports, absent exceptions. ECF No. 19 at ¶ 4; ECF No. 1-2 (CMDU 100, Rule 200). There is no free time for both demurrage and detention for containers returned empty to carrier.2 ECF No. 21 at ¶ 6(i); ECF No. 1-10 at 4, 7, and 10.

Read The Full CaseNot a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free.

Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.

474 F. Supp. 3d 807 *; 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130461 **; 2020 WL 4209051

CMA CGM S.A., Plaintiff, v. LEADER INT'L EXPRESS CORP. a/k/a Leader International Express, Inc., Defendant.

Subsequent History: As Amended July 23, 2020.

CORE TERMS

containers, cargo, custom, force majeure, demurrage, parties, carrier, charges, affirmative defense, detention, service contract, notice, ship, delays, summary judgment, inspection, frustrated, tariff, summary judgment motion, defenses, argues, seizure, free time, unshipped, costs, frustration of purpose, impossibility, occurrence, terminal, booked