Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.
776 F.3d 1343 *; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 24258 **; 113 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1354 ***; 2014 WL 7272219
CONTENT EXTRACTION AND TRANSMISSION LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Defendant-Appellee, AND THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. AND PNC BANK, N.A., Defendants-Appellees.DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Counterdefendant-Cross Appellant, v. CONTENT EXTRACTION AND TRANSMISSION LLC, Defendant-Counterplaintiff-,Appellant, AND MITCHELL MEDINA, CATHERINE ELIAS, AND JEAN-MARC ZIMMERMAN, Defendants, AND JOHN DOE COMPANIES 1-100, JOHN DOE COMPANIES 1-99, TD BANK GROUP, AND TD BANK, N.A. Third-Party Defendants.
Subsequent History: US Supreme Court certiorari denied by Content Extraction & Trans v. Wells Fargo Bank, 2015 U.S. LEXIS 6112 (U.S., Oct. 5, 2015)
Prior History: [**1] Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in Nos. 12-CV-2501, 12-CV-6960, and 12-CV-7640, Judge Michael A. Shipp.
Content Extraction & Transmission LLC v. Wells Fargo Bank, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107184 (D.N.J., July 31, 2013)
patents, district court, abstract idea, invalid, hard copy, infringement, tortious interference, patent-ineligible, documents, storing, recite, patent-eligible, extracting, processing, inventive, baseless, scanner, suits, technology, scanning, generic, memory, prong
Civil Procedure, Appeals, Standards of Review, De Novo Review, Defenses, Demurrers & Objections, Motions to Dismiss, Failure to State Claim, Patent Law, Jurisdiction & Review, Subject Matter, General Overview, Computer & Internet Law, Intellectual Property Protection, Patent Protection, Subject Matter, Infringement Actions, Claim Interpretation, Constitutional Law, Bill of Rights, Fundamental Freedoms, Freedom to Petition, Evidence, Inferences & Presumptions, Presumptions, Particular Presumptions