Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.

Share your feedback on this Case Opinion Preview

Thank You For Submiting Feedback!

Experience a New Era in Legal Research with Free Access to Lexis+

  • Case Opinion

Cook Inlet Tribal Council, Inc. v. Dotomain

Cook Inlet Tribal Council, Inc. v. Dotomain

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

May 13, 2021, Argued; August 24, 2021, Decided

No. 19-5005 Consolidated with 20-5192

Opinion

 [**185]   [*893]  Walker, Circuit Judge: Cook Inlet Tribal Council runs an alcohol recovery program under a self-determination contract with Indian Health Service. The Council says its increased facility costs qualify as contract support costs pursuant to 25 U.S.C. § 5325(a).

We disagree.

Cook Inlet Tribal Council represents eight federally recognized tribes in Alaska. In 1992, it opened an alcohol recovery center in Anchorage. The program started with a residential treatment center but expanded over the years to include several outpatient facilities.

The Council runs its recovery program [***2]  through a contract with Indian Health Service under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act. 25 U.S.C. § 5321. ] The Act authorizes tribes to provide health services otherwise run by the government. In exchange, the government pays for the program. See Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin v. United States, 577 U.S. 250, 252, 136 S. Ct. 750, 193 L. Ed. 2d 652 (2016) ("tribes may enter into 'self-determination contracts' with federal agencies to take control of a variety of federally funded programs").

] The Act requires the government to reimburse contracting tribes for two categories of health care expenses. First, Indian Health Service must pay the secretarial amount — a negotiated sum that can't be less than what Indian Health Service would have spent on the program if it directly provided the health care. 25 U.S.C. § 5325(a)(1); see Salazar v. Ramah Navajo Chapter, 567 U.S. 182, 186, 132 S. Ct. 2181, 183 L. Ed. 2d 186 (2012); see also Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin, 577 U.S. at 252 ("A contracting tribe is eligible to receive the amount of money that the government would have otherwise spent on the program . . . .").

Second, Indian Health Service must pay for contract support costs. Pub. L. No. 100-472, § 205, 102 Stat. 2285, 2292-94 (1988) (codified at 25 U.S.C. § 5325). These funds reimburse tribes for contract compliance expenses Indian Health Service doesn't incur (and therefore doesn't pay) when it runs the program. ] In general, contract support costs cover expenses not contemplated by the secretarial amount, like workers' compensation premiums and some overhead expenses. 25 U.S.C. § 5325(a)(2)-(3) [***3] ; Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma v. Leavitt, 543 U.S. 631, 635, 125 S. Ct. 1172, 161 L. Ed. 2d 66 (2005). With the secretarial amount and the added contract support costs, the government is required to fully fund the contracted-for health program run by a tribe.

Read The Full CaseNot a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free.

Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.

10 F.4th 892 *; 454 U.S. App. D.C. 184 **; 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 25307 ***

COOK INLET TRIBAL COUNCIL, INC., APPELLEE v. EVANGELYN DOTOMAIN, DIRECTOR, ALASKA AREA OFFICE, U.S. INDIAN HEALTH SERVICE, ET AL., APPELLANTS

Subsequent History: Rehearing denied by, En banc Cook Inlet Tribal Council v. Mandregan, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 994 (D.C. Cir., Jan. 12, 2022)

Rehearing denied by Cook Inlet Tribal Council v. Mandregan, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 995 (D.C. Cir., Jan. 12, 2022)

Prior History:  [***1] Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. (No. 1:14-cv-01835).

Cook Inlet Tribal Council v. Mandregan, 348 F. Supp. 3d 1, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190469, 2018 WL 5817350 (D.D.C., Nov. 7, 2018)

CORE TERMS

support costs, costs, expenses, health services, tribes, funds

Governments, Native Americans, Indian Self-Determination & Education Assistance Act, Legislation, Interpretation