Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.

Share your feedback on this Case Opinion Preview

Thank You For Submiting Feedback!

Experience a New Era in Legal Research with Free Access to Lexis+

  • Case Opinion

Corephotonics, Ltd. v. Apple, Inc.

Corephotonics, Ltd. v. Apple, Inc.

United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division

October 1, 2018, Decided; October 1, 2018, Filed

Case No. 17-CV-06457-LHK; Case No. 18-CV-02555-LHK

Opinion

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTIONS TO DISMISS

Re: Dkt. Nos. 47, 68

In two consolidated patent infringement cases, Defendant Apple Inc. ("Apple") moves to dismiss Plaintiff Corephotonics, Ltd.'s ("Corephotonics") willful infringement claims. In the first case, 17-CV-6457, Corephotonics sued Apple for the infringement of four of Corephotonics' patents. ECF No. 1. Corephotonics later filed a First Amended Complaint ("FAC") in that case. ECF No. 42. In the Complaint in the second case, 18-CV-2555, ("'18 [*2]  Compl."), Corephotonics sued Apple for the additional infringement of two of Corephotonics' patents. 18-CV-2555, ECF No. 1. On May 22, 2018, the Court consolidated the two cases, with 17-CV-6457 as the lead case. ECF No. 61.1 Id. Apple now moves to dismiss Corephotonics' willful infringement claims in the FAC and the '18 Complaint. ECF Nos. 47 & 68.

Having considered the parties' briefs, the record in the case, and the relevant law, the Court DENIES Apple's motions to dismiss Corephotonics' willful infringement claims.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Factual Background

Corephotonics "is a company organized and existing under the laws of the State of Israel," and has its principal place of business in Tel Aviv, Israel. FAC ¶ 8. Apple is a California corporation and has its principal place of business in Cupertino, California. Id. ¶ 9.

Corephotonics "is a pioneer in the development of dual camera technologies for mobile devices." Id. ¶ 13. The company's "dual-aperture camera technology changes the way smartphones take pictures by using advanced lens design and sophisticated computational optics." Id. ¶ 15. In brief, Corephotonics' technology "uses two fixed-focal length lenses, a wide-angle lens as typically [*3]  found in smartphones with single-aperture cameras, and a miniature telephoto lens." Id. ¶ 16. As a result, the technology "create[s] an effectively greater level of zoom without degrading image quality by combining digital and optical zoom." Id. Corephotonics "has filed for and received patents on its advanced telephoto lens designs, multi-aperture camera technologies, and optical processing technologies." Id. ¶ 18.

Corephotonics owns: (1) U.S. Patent 9,402,032 (the "'032 patent"), which issued on July 26, 2016; (2) U.S. Patent No. 9,568,712 (the "'712 patent"), which issued on February 14, 2017; (3) U.S. Patent No. 9,185,291 (the "'291 patent"), which issued on November 10, 2015; (4) U.S. Patent No. 9,538,152 (the "'152 patent"), which issued on January 3, 2017; and (5) U.S. Patent No. 9,857,568 (the "'568 patent"), which issued on January 2, 2018. FAC ¶¶ 3-6; '18 Compl. ¶¶ 3-4. The '032, '712, and '568 patents are all entitled "Miniature Telephoto Lens Assembly." FAC ¶¶ 3-4; '18 Compl. ¶¶ 3-4. The '291 patent is entitled "Dual Aperture Zoom Digital Camera," while the '152 patent is entitled "High Resolution Thin Multi-Aperture Imaging Systems." FAC ¶¶ 5-6.

Read The Full CaseNot a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free.

Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.

2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170408 *; 2018 WL 4772340

COREPHOTONICS, LTD., Corephotonics, v. APPLE, INC., Defendant.

Subsequent History: Stay granted by Corephotonics, Ltd. v. Apple, Inc., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 211456 (N.D. Cal., Dec. 14, 2018)

Motion denied by Corephotonics, Ltd. v. Apple, Inc., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96718 (N.D. Cal., June 1, 2020)

CORE TERMS

patents, infringement, willful, camera, technology, allegations, motion to dismiss, iPhone, patent application, enhanced damage, telephoto lens, blindness, email, infringement claim, willfully, contends, patentee, cases, notice, prong, dual, factual allegations, intellectual property, algorithms, pleadings, amend, zoom, egregious conduct, dual-aperture, negotiations