Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.

Share your feedback on this Case Opinion Preview

Thank You For Submiting Feedback!

Experience a New Era in Legal Research with Free Access to Lexis+

  • Case Opinion

Davis v. Navient Corp.

Davis v. Navient Corp.

United States District Court for the Western District of New York

March 12, 2018, Decided; March 12, 2018, Filed

17-CV-00992-LJV-JJM

Opinion

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the motion of defendants Navient Corporation ("Navient") and Navient Solutions, LLC ("Navient Solutions") to dismiss the Complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. ("Rule") 12(b)(6), or in the alternative to strike the class allegations pursuant to Rule 23 [13].1 Having reviewed the parties' submissions [13, 18, 23], and heard oral argument on February 16, 2018 [24], I recommend that the motion be granted in part and denied in part.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff's claims arise from loans which he received under the Federal Family Education Loan Program ("FFELP"). Complaint , ¶¶13, 27, 28. He alleges that Navient is a holding company that holds "the nation's largest portfolio" of FFELP loans, which are serviced by Navient Solutions, f/k/a Sallie Mae, Inc., its wholly-owned subsidiary. Id. ¶¶7, 8, 11, 12, 16.

In connection [*2]  with plaintiff's FFELP loans, he signed a Federal Stafford Loan Master Promissory Note ("MPN"). Id., P28; [13-2], pp. 2-7 of 7. Plaintiff alleges that "Navient Solutions and/or Sallie Mae Inc. was the lender pursuant to the MPN". Complaint , P33. He alleges that he was enrolled in "Income Based Repayment", and that as directed by the MPN and Navient's website, he "consulted his loan servicer Navient Solutions regarding his best options for repayment" in the Fall of 2014. Id., ¶¶34-35. He alleges that during these conversations, "Navient Solutions purposely omitted from its conversations with [him] the best repayment option for him: direct consolidation of his existing FFELP loans through the Department of Education", which offered a discounted interest rate. Id., ¶¶18, 37.

As a result of this conduct, plaintiff alleges that Navient Solutions breached an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing (id., Count 1), and that Navient tortiously interfered with the MPN by directing Navient Solutions to purposefully withhold from borrowers the fact that the best repayment option was a direct consolidation loan with the Department of Education. Id., Count 2. Separately, plaintiff alleges that [*3]  Navient Solutions breached the MPN by "releasing personal information regarding [his] FFELP loans" to "Studebt and other fraudulent student debt companies", who used that information to "defraud and injure". Id., ¶¶97-99, Count 3.2 Plaintiff purports to assert these claims on behalf of himself and a class of "[a]ll persons who held a FFELP loan with . . . Navient Solutions, formerly known as Sallie Mae, Inc., from the years 2010 to the present". Id., ¶¶68, 69.

Read The Full CaseNot a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free.

Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.

2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41365 *

SHAWN M. DAVIS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. NAVIENT CORPORATION, NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC, FORMERLY KNOWN AS SALLIE MAE, INC., and STUDEBT, ALSO KNOWN AS STUDENT DEBT RELIEF GROUP ALSO KNOWN AS STUDENT LOAN RELIEF COUNSELORS, Defendants.

Subsequent History: Adopted by, Motion granted by, in part, Motion denied by, As moot, Dismissed without prejudice by Davis v. Navient Corp., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14135 (W.D.N.Y., Jan. 29, 2019)

CORE TERMS

allegations, recommend, loans, plaintiff's claim, Defendants', class member, preemption, predominance, repayment, class certification, consolidation, pleadings, preempted, lender, motion to strike, questions, filings