Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.

Share your feedback on this Case Opinion Preview

Thank You For Submiting Feedback!

Experience a New Era in Legal Research with Free Access to Lexis+

  • Case Opinion

Davis v. Urquiza

Davis v. Urquiza

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

February 18, 2014, Heard in the Court of Appeals; April 15, 2014, Filed

NO. COA13-1089

Opinion

 [*462]   [**328]  Appeal by plaintiffs from order entered 11 March 2013 by Judge James M. Webb in  [**329]  Surry County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 18 February 2014.

STEELMAN, Judge.

] Where valid service of process was not made upon an uninsured motorist carrier within the applicable statute of limitations period, the trial court did not err in granting the motion of the uninsured motorist carrier to dismiss for insufficient process or insufficient service of process.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

On 15 July 2009, Deaven Grey Davis, then a minor, was a passenger in a vehicle struck by another vehicle operated by Hermilo Salazar Urquiza ("defendant"). On 31 May 2012, Deaven Davis, along with her parents, Danette and Dickie G. Davis (collectively, "plaintiffs") filed  [*463]  suit against defendant, seeking monetary damages for personal injuries resulting from the collision.

Defendant  [***2] was an uninsured motorist. Plaintiffs contended that North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company ("Farm Bureau") provided uninsured motorists' coverage for the collision in accordance with N.C. Gen. Stat. § 20-279.21(b)(3). Defendant was served with a copy of the summons and complaint on 29 July 2012. Plaintiffs also contended that National Grange Insurance Company ("National Grange") provided applicable uninsured motorists' coverage.

On 5 June 2012, counsel for plaintiffs mailed a copy of the summons and complaint to Steve Wagoner, a claims adjuster for Farm Bureau, by certified mail, at Wagoner's office in Wilkesboro. These documents were received on 7 June 2012. On 6 July 2012, Farm Bureau filed an answer to plaintiffs' complaint, as an unnamed party, specifically asserting the defenses of insufficiency of process and insufficiency of service of process, as well as the statute of limitations. On 27 December 2012, Farm Bureau gave notice to plaintiffs of a hearing on 7 January 2013 concerning its motion to dismiss based upon insufficiency of process and insufficiency of service of process. On 31 December 2012, Farm Bureau served the affidavit of H. Julian Philpott, Jr. This  [***3] affidavit stated that Steve Wagoner "was not now, nor has he ever been an officer, director or managing agent of North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company, nor has he ever been a designated process agent for that company..."

Plaintiffs caused alias and pluries summonses to be issued by the Clerk of Superior Court of Surry County, directed to defendant, on 20 July 2012, 25 September 2012, and 10 December 2012. On 2 January 2013, plaintiffs mailed a copy of the summons and complaint to Wayne Goodwin, Commissioner of Insurance, by certified mail, in order to serve Farm Bureau in accordance with the provisions of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 58-16-30. This was received by the Commissioner of Insurance on 7 January 2013.

Read The Full CaseNot a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free.

Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.

233 N.C. App. 462 *; 757 S.E.2d 327 **; 2014 N.C. App. LEXIS 356 ***; 2014 WL 1457688

DEAVEN GREY DAVIS, DANETTE DAVIS and DICKIE G. DAVIS, Plaintiffs, v. HERMILO SALAZAR URQUIZA, Defendant.

Subsequent History: Counsel Amended April 21, 2014.

Prior History:  [***1] Surry County. No. 12 CVS 817. James M. Webb, Judge.

Disposition: AFFIRMED.

CORE TERMS

copy of the summons, uninsured motorist, limitations period, carrier, insurer, service of process, certified mail, mailed, trial court, plaintiffs', insurance company, statute of limitations, motion to dismiss, notice

Civil Procedure, Service of Process, Time Limitations, Untimely Service, Appeals, Standards of Review, De Novo Review, Responses, Defenses, Demurrers & Objections, Motions to Dismiss, Insurance Law, Motor Vehicle Insurance, Obligations, Notice Requirements, Methods of Service, Service on Corporations, General Overview, Governments, Legislation, Interpretation, Proof of Service, Evidence, Burdens of Proof, Allocation, Statute of Limitations, Pleadings & Proof, Burden Shifting, Time Limitations, Torts, Procedural Matters