Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.

Share your feedback on this Case Opinion Preview

Thank You For Submiting Feedback!

Experience a New Era in Legal Research with Free Access to Lexis+

  • Case Opinion

Dengel v. Waukesha County

Dengel v. Waukesha County

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin

April 17, 2014, Decided; April 17, 2014, Filed

Case No. 13-CV-484-JPS

Opinion

 [*984]  ORDER

The plaintiff, Daniel Dengel, filed this suit on April 30, 2013. (Docket #1). In it, he alleges that his former employer, Waukesha County ("Waukesha" or "the County"), terminated his employment in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq. (Compl. ¶¶ 1, 32-37). The County moved  [*985]  for summary judgment on Dengel's claims. (Docket #24). That motion is now fully briefed (Docket #25, #34, #44), and the Court addresses it.

1. FACTUAL BACKGROUND1

There are two essential pieces of this story: first, background about Mr. Dengel's behavior; and, second, the County's steps to address Mr. Dengel's behavior. The Court will discuss each of those component parts  [**2] separately, as follows.

1.1 Daniel Dengel's Behavior

Daniel Dengel worked for Waukesha County's Department of Emergency preparedness from May 24, 1999, until November 19, 2010. (DPFF ¶ 4). During that time, he served as a Radio Services Technician. (DPFF ¶ 4). That position required him to install, maintain, and repair the County's various radio communication systems. (DPFF ¶ 5). Some of the primary users of those communications systems were emergency services providers: the police, fire, and EMS departments, all of which used the systems for communication, dispatching, and warning siren systems. (DPFF ¶ 5).

Mr. Dengel generally received good performance reviews while working in his position. (DPFF ¶ 12). He was rated as "Greater Than Effective" during every period he worked until the 2008-2009 period. (DPFF ¶ 12). His performance rating dropped, however, for the 2008-2009 period, as a result of reported timeliness and task completion issues. (DPFF ¶¶ 12-13 (quoting from Tuma Aff., Ex. 3 (2008-2009 Performance Evaluation)). Nonetheless, for the 2008-2009 period, Mr. Dengel was still rated "Effective." (DPFF ¶ 12).

Beginning around August of 2009, Mr. Dengel engaged in a series of behaviors  [**3] that his supervisors found strange. First, on August 24, 2009, Mr. Dengel sent an email to the County's other Radio Services staff, stating "To Whom It May Concern: Please return the medium point black Sharpie to the pen holder next to my pc...the one labeled 'Put it back or I'll break your fingers!'" (DPFF ¶ 15 (admitted); but see PPFF ¶ 22 (asserting that supervisors never addressed this issue with Mr. Dengel)).

Read The Full CaseNot a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free.

Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.

16 F. Supp. 3d 983 *; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53374 **; 2014 WL 1572919

DANIEL B. DENGEL, Plaintiff, v. WAUKESHA COUNTY, Defendant.

CORE TERMS

disability, radio, employees, return to work, business necessity, provider, email, authorization, job-related, adverse employment action, summary judgment, terminated, documents, session, seal, van, prima facie, retaliation, paper towel, disclosure, inhibited, reasons, medical evaluation, prima facie case, workplace, alleges, protected activity, similarly situated, indirect method, work release